Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions pp 446-447 | Cite as
On the d→p+n Vertex Constant
Abstract
It was as long ago as 1958 that Chew proposed to continue the differential cross section as a function of the reaction angle to the nonphysical region and in this way to extract spectroscopic information1). The analyticity of the differential cross section follows from that of the amplitude. It is well known that the singularities of the amplitude in the z=cos θ plane represent various direct reaction m chanisms, the simplest and well-studied one is the transfer pole2,3). The residue at the pole contains information on the asymptotical normalization of the wave function of the transferred particle in both nuclei.
References
- 1).G.F. Chew, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 1380Google Scholar
- 2).I.S. Shapiro, Proc. Int. School Phys. Enrico Fermi, course 38, ( Academic Press, New York ) 1966, p. 210Google Scholar
- 3).E.I. Dolinsky et al., Nucl. Phys. A202 (1973) 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4).S. Ciulli, Nuovo Cimento A61 (1969) 787; A62 (1969) 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5).R.E. Cutkosky, B.B. Deo, Phys. Rev. 174 (1968) 1859Google Scholar
- 6).S. Dubnicka, 0.V. Dumbrajs, Nucl. Phys. A235 (1974) 417Google Scholar
- 7).L.S. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22. (1972) 505Google Scholar
- 8).L.S. Kisslinger, Phys.Lett. 47B (1973) 93Google Scholar
- 9).I. Borbély, Nuovo Cim. Lett.; Dubna preprint E4–8445(1974)Google Scholar
- 10).T. Hamada, I.D. Johnston Nucl. Phys. 34 (1962) 382Google Scholar
- 11).R.V. Reid, Ann. of Phys. (1968) 411Google Scholar
- 12).M.P. Locher, Nucl. Phys. B23 (1970) 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13).D.C. Kocher, T.B. Clegg, Nucl. Phys. A132 (1969) 455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14).R. Grotzschel et al., Nucl. Phys. A174 (1971) 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15).T.A. Cahill, J. Greenwood, Phys. Rev. C4 (1971) 1499Google Scholar
- 16).S.N. Bunker et al., Nucl. Phys. A113 (1968) 461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17).I. Borbély, F. Nichitiu, Dubna preprintGoogle Scholar