Chaos pp 97-124 | Cite as

Discrete Graphs – A Paradigm Model for Quantum Chaos

Chapter
Part of the Progress in Mathematical Physics book series (PMP, volume 66)

Abstract

The research in Quantum Chaos attempts to uncover the fingerprints of classical chaotic dynamics in the corresponding quantum description. To get to the roots of this problem, various simplified models were proposed and used. Here a very simple model of a random walker on large d-regular graphs, and its quantum analogue are proposed as a paradigm which shares many salient features with realistic models – namely the affinity of the spectral statistics with random matrix theory, the role of cycles and their statistics, and percolation of level sets of the eigenvectors. These concepts will be explained and reviewed with reference to the original publications for further details.

Keywords

Periodic Orbit Regular Graph Trace Formula Random Matrix Theory Random Wave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Yehonatan Elon, Eigenvectors of the discrete Laplacian on regular graphs-a statistical approach, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 435203 (2008).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Yehonatan Elon, Gaussian Waves on the Regular Tree, arXiv:0907.5065v2 [math-ph] (2009).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    PhD thesis submitted to the Feinberg School, The Weizmann Institute of Science (2010).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    MSc thesis submitted to the Feinberg School, The Weizmann Institute of Science (2009).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Idan Oren, Amit Godel and Uzy Smilansky, Trace formulae and spectral statistics for discrete Laplacians on regular graphs (I), J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 415101 (2009).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Idan Oren and Uzy Smilansky, Trace formulae and spectral statistics for discrete Laplacians on regular graphs (II), J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 225205 (2010).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Uzy Smilansky Exterior-Interior Duality for Discrete Graphs J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 035101 (2009).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Uzy Smilansky, Quantum Chaos on Discrete Graphs, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, F621–F630 (2007).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Jakobson, S. Miller, I. Rivin and Z. Rudnick, Level spacings for regular graphs, IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications 109, 317–329 (1999).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A.A. Terras, Arithmetic Quantum Chaos, IAS/Park City Mathematical Series 12, 333–375 (2002).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Hoory, N. Linial, and A. Wigderson Expander Graphs and Their Applications, Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society 43, Number 4, 439–561 (2006), S 0273-0979(06)01126–8.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Dodziuk and W.S. Kandel Combinatorial Laplacians and isoperimetric inequality, in “From local times to global geometry, control and physics”, K.D. Ellworthy ed., Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 150, 68–74 (1986).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    B. Bollobas, Random Graphs, Academic Press, London (1985).MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Fan R.K. Chung, Spectral Graph Theory, Regional Conference Series in Mathematics 92, American Mathematical Society (1997).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Friedman, Some geometric aspects of graphs and their eigenfunctions, Duke Math. J. 69, 487–525 (1993).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    N. Alon, Eigenvalues and Expanders, Combinatorica, 6, 83–96 (1986).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    H. Kesten Symmetric random walks on groups, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 92, 336–354 (1959).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    McKay, B.D., The expected eigenvalue distribution of a random labelled regular graph, Linear Algebr. Appl. 40, 203–216 (1981).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Ram Murty, Ramanjuan Graphs, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 18, 1–20 (2003).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    J.E. Avron, A. Raveh and B. Zur, Adiabatic quantum transport in multiply connected systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 60, No. 4 (1988).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    O. Bohigas, M.-J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1–4 (1984).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    M.V. Berry and M. Tabor, Level clustering in the regular spectrum, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 356, 375–394 (1977).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    O. Bohigas, Random Matrix Theories and Chaotic Dynamics, in Chaos and Quantum Physics, M.J. Giannoni, A. Voros and J. Zinn-Justin, editors, pp. 87–199, North- Holland (1989).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Fritz Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos, Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg, (2001).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    S. Sodin, The Tracy–Widom law for some sparse random matrices, J. Stat. Phys. 136, 834–841 (2009), arXiv:0903.4295v2 [math-ph].Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    M.C. Gutzwiller, J. Math. Phys. 12, 343 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    M. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, Springer Verlag, New York (1991).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    M.V. Berry, Semiclassical Theory of Spectral Rigidity, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 400, No. 1819 (Aug. 8, 1985), pp. 229–251.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    N. Argaman, F. Dittes, E. Doron, J. Keating, A. Kitaev, M. Sieber and U. Smilansky. Correlations in the Acions of Periodic Orbits Derived from Quantum Chaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4326–4329 (1993).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. Sieber, K. Richter, Correlations between Periodic Orbits and their Rôle in Spectral Statistics, Physica Scripta, Volume T90, Issue 1, pp. 128–133.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    S. Heusler, S. Müller, P. Braun, and F. Haake, Universal spectral form factor for chaotic dynamics, J. Phys. A 37, L31 (2004).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    H. Bass, The Ihara–Selberg zeta function of a tree lattice, Internat. J. Math. 3, 717– 797 (1992).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    L. Bartholdi, Counting paths in graphs. Enseign. Math 45, 83–131 (1999).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    N. Alon, I. Benjamini, E. Lubetzky, S. Sodin, Non-backtracking random walks mix faster, arXiv:math/0610550v1.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    P. Mnëv, Discrete Path Integral Approach to the Selberg Trace Formula for Regular Graphs, Commun. Math. Phys. 274, 233–241 (2007).Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    S. Janson, T. ̷Luczak and A. Ruciński,Random Graphs, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2000).Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    N.C. Wormald, The asymptotic distribution of short cycles in random regular graphs, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B 31, 168–182 (1981).Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    B. Bollobás, A probabilistic proof of an asymptotic formula for the number of labelled regular graphs, European J. Combin. 1, 311–316 (1980).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    B.D. McKay, N.C. Wormald and B. Wysocka, Short cycles in random regular graphs, The electronic journal of combinatorics, 11, R66.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    J.P. Keating and N.C. Snaith, Random Matrix Theory and ζ(1/2 + it), Commun. Math. Phys. 214, 57–89 (2000).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    A.I. Shnirelman, Ergodic properties of eigenfunctions, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 29 (6(180)), 181–182 (1974).Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    E.J. Heller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 1515 (1984).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    M.V. Berry, J. Phys. A 10, 2083–2091 (1977).MATHGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    R. Courant, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math. Phys. Kl. (1923).Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Galya Blum, Sven Gnutzmann, and Uzy Smilansky, Nodal Domains Statistics: A Criterion for Quantum Chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88,114101 (2002).Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    E. Bogomolny and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 114102 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Geoffrey Grimmett, Percolation, 2nd Edition, Grundlehren der mathematischenWissenschaften, vol. 321, Springer, (1999).Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    R. Blümel and U. Smilansky, Random matrix description of chaotic scattering: Semi Classical Approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 241–244 (1990).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    E. Doron, U. Smilansky and A. Frenkel. Chaotic scattering and transmission fluctuations. Physica D 50, 367–390 (1991).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    T. Kottos and U. Smilansky, Quantum Graphs: A simple model for Chaotic Scattering. J. Phys. A. 36, 3501–3524 (2003).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    S. Fedorov and B. Pavlov, Discrete wave scattering on star-graph. J. Phys. A:Math. Gen. 39, 2657–2671 (2006).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    E.B. Curtis and J.A. Morrow, The Dirichlet to Neumann map for a resistor network SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 51, 1011–1029 (1991).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    T. Kottos and U. Smilansky, Quantum Chaos on Graphs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4794– 4797 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    T. Kottos and U. Smilansky, Periodic orbit theory and spectral statistics for quantum graphs, Annals of Physics 274, 76–124 (1999).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Sven Gnutzmann and Uzy Smilansky, Quantum Graphs: Applications to Quantum Chaos and Universal Spectral Statistics, Advances in Physics bf 55, 527–625 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    R. Brooks, Ann. Inst. Fourier 49, 707–725 (1999).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics of Complex SystemsThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
  2. 2.School of MathematicsCardiff UniversityCardiffWales, UK

Personalised recommendations