Advertisement

Dov Tamari (formerly Bernhard Teitler)

  • Folkert Müller-Hoissen
  • Hans-Otto Walther
Chapter
Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 299)

Abstract

The life of Dov Tamari is described, including a brief introduction to his mathematical work.

Keywords

American Mathematical Society Word Problem Binary Operation Multiplicative System Israel Defense Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Tamari, Moritz Pasch (1843-1939), Shaker, Aachen, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Memories of Dov Tamari, age 84, as told to his niece Ditta”. Summary of a telephone interview with Ditta Tamari, written up by the latter. Circa 1995. Computer typescript, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Tamari, Biographical Note written in Paris around 1952-53; Doram Tamari, private archive.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Magnus and R. Moufang, “Max Dehn zum Gedächtnis”, Math. Annalen 127 (1954) 215-227.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Dautzenberg, “Prof. Dr. Dov Tamari †”, uniforum, Zeitung der Justus-Liebig-Universitat Gießen, 19. Jahrgang, Nr. 4 (October 12, 2006), 11.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (September 2, 1984), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Letters, Zervos to Müller-Hoissen (May 12 and August 11, 2011).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Krasner, “Nombres semi-réels et espaces ultramétriques”, C. R. Acad. Sci. 229 (1944) 433-435.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Tamari, Biographical Note written around 1952. Doram Tamari, private archive.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Letter, Frieda Teitler to the General Officer commanding the Forces in Palestine (March 23, 1941), CZA and MUP.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Dov Tanari: list of papers”, SWLLAC-T38.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Tamari, “Une théorie constructive de l’associativité générale”, Eleutheria (1986A) 93-127.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Tamari, “Foundations of graphic associativity theory (G.A.T.) and 4CM”, unpublished manuscript (1990).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    CIA, Office of Strategic Services, “The objectives and activities of the Irgun Zvai Leumi”, R&A No. 2612 (October 23, 1944), declassified document.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palestine Post (July 14, 1939).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palestine Post (July 16, 1939).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Rossoff, “Arie Levin, father of the Jewish prisoners”, The Jewish Magazine, no. 18 (February 1999).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palestine Post (May 1, 1940).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Letter, L. Altman to the High Commissioner of Palestine (February 24, 1941), JI, Correspondence 1116.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Letter, Major Taylor to Altman (February 26, 1941), JI, Correspondence 1116.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palestine Gazette (November 26, 1942), 1299.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palestine Post (July 25, 1939).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Letter, Rector of the Hebrew University to Burton (February 10, 1944), HUCA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Tamari, “On a certain classification of rings and semigroups”, Bulletin AMS 54 (1948) 153-158.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Corry, Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2004.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L.A. Bokut, “Embeddings of rings”, Russ. Math. Surv. 42 (1987) 105-138.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.C. Coutinho and J.C. McConnell, “The quest for quotient rings (of noncommutative Noethe- rian rings)”, Amer. Math. Monthly 110 (2003) 298-313; S.C. Coutinho, “Quotient rings of noncommutative rings in the first half of the 20th century”, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 58 (2004) 255-281.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    O. Ore, “Linear equations in non-commutative fields”, Ann. Math. 31 (1931) 463-477.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. Dubreil, Algèbre, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1946.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Tamari, “On the embedding of Birkhoff-Witt rings in quotient fields”, Proc. AMS 4 (1953) 197-202.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    A.W. Goldie, “Some aspects of ring theory”, Bull. London Math. Soc. 1 (1969) 129-154.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D. Tamari, “A refined classification of semi-groups leading to generalized polynomial rings with a generalized degree concept”, in Proc. ICM, Amsterdam 1954, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1957,439-440.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    List of talks, Zeitschr. für math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math. 8 (1962) 351-352.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bulletin de la S.M.F. 79 (1951) xx.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    P.S. Alexandrov et al, “Anatoly Ivanovich Malcev: Obituary”, Russ. Math. Surv. 23 (1968) 157-168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. Dimitric, “Anatoly Ivanovich Maltsev”, The Math. Intell. 14 (1992) 26-31.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    G. Grätzer, Lattice Theory, First Concepts and Distributive Lattices, Freeman, San Francisco, 1971.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    D. Tamari, “Elementary theory of special lists and their poset-lattices”, unpublished manuscript (1996).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    G.-C. Rota, “The many lives of lattice theory”, Not. AMS 44 (1997) 1440-1445.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    D. Tamari, “The algebra of bracketings and their enumeration”, Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde (3) 10 (1962) 131-146.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    R. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999; “Catalan addendum”, http://www-math.mit.edu/~rstan/ec/catadd.pdf(2011).
  42. 42.
    J. Stasheff, “How I ’met’ Dov Tamari”, in this volume. Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    D. Tamari, “Associativity theory and the theory of lists. Their applications from abstract algebra to the four-colour map problem”, Congressus Numerantium 54 (1986) 39-53.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    D. Tamari, “Sur quelques problèmes d’associativité”, Ann. sci. Univ. Clermont-Ferrand 2, Série Math. 24 (1964) 91-107.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    H. Friedman and D. Tamari, “problèmes d’ associativité: une structure de treillis finis induite par une loi demi-associative”, Journal of Combinatorial Theory 2 (1967) 215-242.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    S. Huang and D. Tamari, “Problems of associativity: a simple proof for the lattice property of systems ordered by a semi-associative law”, J. Comb. Theory (A) 13 (1972) 7-13.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. Tamari, “The story: On proofs and editorial policies”, unpublished manuscript (1997).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    D. Huguet, “La structure du treillis des polyédres de parenthésages”, Algebra Universalis 5 (1975) 82-87.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    E.S. Ljapin and A.E. Evseev, The Theory of Partial Algebraic Operations, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    W.P. Wardlaw, “Computer aided intuition in abstract algebra”, Comput. & Education 2 (1978) 247-257; “Finitely associative groupoids and algebras”, Houston J. Math. 9 (1983) 587-598; “A generalized general associative law”, Math. Magazine 74 (2001) 230-233.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    R.H. Bruck, A Survey of Binary Systems, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    S. Gensemer, “Partial groupoid embeddings in semigroups”, in this volume. Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    D. Tamari, “Le problèmes d’associativité des monoïdes et le problème des mots pour les demi-groupes; algèbres partielles et chaînes élémentaires”, Sém. Dubreil-Pisot (Algèbre et Théorie des nombres) 24(8) (1970/71) 1-15.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    T. Evans, “The word problem for abstract algebras”, J. London Math. Soc. 26(1951) 64-71; “Embeddability and the word problem”, J. London Math. Soc. 28 (1953) 76-80.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    M. Dehn, “Über unendliche diskontinuierliche Gruppen”, Math. Annalen 71 (1911) 116-144.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    J. Berstel and D. Perrin, “The origins of combinatorics on words”, Europ. J. Comb. 28 (2007) 996-1022.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    A. Thue, “Die Lösung eines Spezialfalles eines generellen logischen Problems”, Kra. Vidensk. Selsk. Skrifter. I. Mat. Nat. Kl., no. 8 (1910).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    D. Tamari, “Problèmes d’associativité des monoïdes et problèmes des mots pour les groupes”, Sém. Dubreil-Pisot (Algèbre et Théorie des nombres) 16(7) (1962/63) 1-29.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Letter, Boone to Gödel (August 14, 1967), PUL-G: Tamari, Dov, 1959-61,1966-67, Box 3b, Folder 180, document no. 012723.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Letter, Gödel to Ginzburg (May 25, 1973), SWLLAC-T38.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    D. Tamari, “A graphic theory of associativity and word-chain patterns”, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 969 (1982) 302-320.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Letter, Schwartz to Freudenthal (June 29, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Letter, Jacobson to Tamari (September 15, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (August 10, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    D. Tamari, “The associativity problem for monoids and the word problem for semigroups and groups”, in Word Problems – Decision Problems and the Burnside Problem in Group Theory, eds W.W. Boone, F.B. Cannonito and R.C. Lyndon, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973, 591-607.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    A. Ginzburg, “Representation of groups by generalized normal multiplication tables”, Canadian J. Math. 19 (1967) 774-791.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Verein ehemaliger Helmholtzschüler e.V., “Nachruf auf Dr. Meir Steinberger”, VEH-Info Nr. 114 (2008).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    H. Thiel, Die jüdischen Lehrer und Schüler der Frankfurter Helmholtzschule, 1912-1936, Schriften des Vereins Ehemaliger Helmholtzschüler, Heft 5, Frankfurt am Main, 1994.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Notices of the AMS 55 (2008)722.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    M. Steinberger, “On multiplicative properties of families of complexes of certain loops”, Canadian J. Math. 25 (1973) 1066.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Letters, Tamari to IAS (December 7, 1959; January 9, 1960), SWLLAC-T38.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Letter, Tamari to Weil (December 10, 1959), SWLLAC-T136.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Letter, Oppenheimer to Tamari (February 1, 1960), SWLLAC-T136.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    J. Horváth, “The life and works of Leopoldo Nachbin”, Asp. Math. Appl. 34 (1986) 1-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    J.B. de Carvalho and D. Tamari, “Sur l’associativité partielle des symétrisations de semi-groupes”, Portugaliae Mathematica 21 (1962) 157-169.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    J. Lambek, “The immersibility of a semigroup into a group”, Canadian J. Math. 3 (1951) 34-43.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    E.L. Ortiz, “Professor António Monteiro and contemporary mathematics in Argentina”, Portugaliae Mathematica 39 (1980) XIX-XXXII.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    R. Cignoli, “The mathematics of António Aniceto Monteiro”, Actas del IX Congreso Dr. Antonio A.R. Monteiro (2007) 3-8.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Tamari (August 2, 1984), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (April 1, 1953), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Tamari (August 1, 1961), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (August 31, 1961), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Tamari (November 3, 1961), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    J.A. Jenkins, “A transitivity question for analytic continuation”, in Algebraic and Differential Topology - Global Differential Geometry, ed. G.M. Rassias, Teubner, Leipzig, 1984, 147-149.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (November 28, 1961), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (December 11, 1961), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Tamari (January 2, 1962), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Tamari (January 29, 1962), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (February 26, 1964), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    D. Lambot de Fougères, “Propriétés géométriques liées aux parenthésages d’un produit de m facteurs. Application à une loi de composition partielle”, Séminaire Dubreil-Pisot (Algèbre et théorie des nombres) 18 (1964/65) 1-21.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    D. Huguet and D. Tamari, “La structure polyédrale des complexes de parénthesages”, J. Comb., Inf. & Syst. Sci. 3 (1978) 69-81.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    I. Sols, “Federico Gaeta, among the last classics”, in Liaison, Schottky Problem and Invariant Theory: Remembering Federico Gaeta, eds. M.E. Alonso, E. Arrondo and R. Mallavibarrena and I. Sols, Progress in Mathematics 280, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2010, 3-6; C. Ciliberto, “Federico Gaeta and his Italian heritage”, loc. cit., 9-33.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    K.D. Magill, Jr., “An interview with John Isbell”, Topol. Commentary 1(2) (1996).Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    K.D. Magill and S. Subbiah, “Regular J-classes of semigroups of continua”, Semigroup Forum 22 (1981) 159-179.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    J.K. Luedeman, “On the embedding of compact domains”, Math. Z. 115 (1970) 113-116; “On the embedding of topological domains into quotient fields”, manuscripta math. 3 (1970) 213-226.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    K.E. Osondu, “Symmetrizations of semigroups”, Semigroup Forum 24 (1982) 67-75; “Malcev sequences and associative symmetrizations”, Semigroup Forum 29 (1984) 61-73.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Letter, Tamari to Montgomery (January 12, 1967), SWLLAC-T38.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Letter, Gödel to Faculty of Math. (February 9,1967), PUL-G: Tamari, Dov, 1959-61,1966-67, Box 3b, Folder 180, document no. 012707; also SWLLAC-T38.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    D. Tamari, “The equivalence of associativity and word-problems”, Queen’s Papers in Pure andAppl. Math. 25 (1970) 171-189.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    R. Hrmová, “Partial groupoids with some associativity conditions”, Mathematica Slovaca 21 (1971)285-311.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    P.W. Bunting, J. van Leeuwen and D. Tamari, “Deciding associativity for partial multiplication tables of order 3”, Math. Comp. 32 (1978) 593-605.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Report from CAFTES, Notices of the AMS 30 (1983) 232-233.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Letter, Carl Alpert (Executive Vice Chairman, Board of Governors, Technion) to Oppenheimer (June 18, 1963), SWLLAC-T136.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Letter, Tamari to Oppenheimer (May 14, 1963), SWLLAC-T136.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Letter, Oppenheimer to Dori (May 29, 1963), SWLLAC-T136.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Letter, Dori to Oppenheimer (June 19, 1963), SWLLAC-T136.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Letter, Tamari to Oppenheimer (February 26, 1964), SWLLAC-T136.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Letter, Herbstein to Tamari (July 15, 1963), SWLLAC-T136.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Letter, Goldberg to Hacquaert (January 16, 1968), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Letter, Tamari to Hacquaert (February 15, 1968), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Merikoski (President of IAUPL) (Jan 7, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    R. Yaron, “Die Entscheidung im Schiedsgericht zwischen Professor Dov Tamari und dem Technion Israel Institute of Technology”, German translation of the decision of the court of arbitration (original in Hebrew), April 15 (1970), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (April 9, 1971), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Tamari (May 5, 1971), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Gödel (May 28, 1971), PUL-G: Tamari, Dov, re: Tamari vs. Technion Israel 1968, 1971, Box 3b, Folder 181, attachment no. 012729; also NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    D. Tamari, “The Affair Tamari-Technion, or About Israeli Universities and their Professors’ Associations”, (Febr./March 1971), PUL-G: Tamari, Dov, re: Tamari vs. Technion Israel 1968, 1971, Box 3b, Folder 181, document no. 012731; also NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Draft of letter to the President of Technion (1971), PUL-G: Tamari, Dov, re: Tamari vs. Technion Israel 1968, 1971, Box 3b, Folder 181, document no. 012730; also NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Letter, Cartan to Freudenthal (June 5, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    C. Thomassen, “Gabriel Andrew Dirac”, J. Graph Theory 9 (1985) 303-318.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Letter, Pedersen et al to Freudenthal (June 7, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Letter, Gödel to Freudenthal (July 27, 1971), PUL-G: Tamari, Dov, re: Tamari vs. Technion Israel 1968, 1971, Box 3b, Folder 181, document no. 012736; also NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Letter, President of Technion to Freudenthal (July 11, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    A. Robinson, “A note on embedding problems”, Fund. Math. 50 (1962) 455-461.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Letter, Jacobson and Robinson to Freudenthal (July 12, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Letter, Freudenthal to President of Technion (August 19, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Letter, President of Technion to Freudenthal (November 16, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    D. Tamari, Selected comments to Goldberg’s letter to Freudenthal of Nov. 16,1971 (December 14, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Letter, Freudenthal to President of Technion (January 10, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Letter, President of Technion to Freudenthal (January 26, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Letter, Dirac and Myhill to Tamari (January 11, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Letter, Katchalski to Freudenthal (July 19, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Letter, Kleene to Freudenthal (June 15, 1971), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Letter, Tamari to Editor of the Notices of the AMS (March 23, 1971), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Letter, Jacobson to Tamari (June 19, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Letter, Tamari to Jacobson (July 3, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    E. Pitcher, A History of the Second Fifty Years American Mathematical Society 1939-1988, AMS, Providence, 1988, 290-291.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Letter, Freudenthal to Tamari (October 2, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Letter, Mostert to Freudenthal (November 2, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Letter, Mostert to Goldberg (December 4, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Letter, Mostert to Tamari (December 4, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Letter, Tamari to Mostert (March 12, 1973), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Letter, Mostert to Tamari (December 11, 1973), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Letter, Ginzburg to Gödel (April 24, 1973), PUL-G: Tamari, Dov, 1973, undated, Box 3b, Folder 182, document no. 012747.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (February 11, 1974), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Letter, Tamari to Mostert (January 6, 1974), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Letter, Tamari to Mostert (January 16, 1974), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Letter, Tamari to Freudenthal (May 15, 1983), NHA-F74.Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    D. Bowman and D. Tamari, in Abstracts of papers presented to the AMS 9 (1988) 415, 502.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    D. Klein, “Lebenswege der Mathematikprofessoren kreüzten sich”, uniforum, Zeitüng der Jüstüs-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 21. Jahrgang, Nr. 2 (May 15, 2008), 14.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Letter, Tamari to Dautzenberg (December 8, 1989).Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Letter, Cartan to Freudenthal (February 27, 1972), NHA-F1857.Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    D. Tamari, “200 years theorem of Gauß 1797-1997”, unpublished manuscript (1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institute for Dynamics and Self-OrganizationGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Mathematisches InstitutUniversity of GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations