Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Global AI Ethics Documents: What They Reveal About Motivations, Practices, and Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Codes of Ethics and Ethical Guidelines

Part of the book series: The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology ((ELTE,volume 23))

Abstract

In recent years, numerous organizations worldwide have produced normative documents identifying potential benefits, harms, and associated recommendations related to artificial intelligence (AI). This chapter examines why these AI ethics documents are being produced and what they can tell us about the motivations, practices, and policies that surround AI. While much of the literature to-date discusses whether consensus on ethical principles is emerging, critical unanswered questions remain around representation and power, the translation of principles to practices, and the complex set of reasons that underlie the creation of these documents. Our work brings attention to these underexplored issues through a comprehensive literature review, and by proposing a novel typology of motivations that helps to characterize the creation of AI ethics documents. Finally, drawing on the recent case of gene-editing ethics documents, we argue that AI ethics stakeholders can achieve more beneficial impacts for society by fostering more diverse and inclusive participatory processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For examples, see documents by Merck (2017) and the Organizing Committee of the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing (2018).

References

  • Abebe, Rediet, Solon Barocas, Jon Kleinberg, Karen Levy, Manish Raghavan, and David G. Robinson. 2020. Roles for Computing in Social Change. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 252–260. FAT* ’20. Barcelona, Spain: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372871.

  • Alliance for Regenerative Medicine. 2019. The Alliance for Regenerative Medicine Releases Statement of Principles on Genome Editing. Washington, DC: Alliance for Regenerative Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araki, M., and T. Ishii. 2014. International regulatory landscape and integration of corrective genome editing into in vitro fertilization. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 12: 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Automated Decision Systems Task Force. 2019. New York City Automated Decision Systems Task Force Report. New York: Automated Decision Systems Task Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagloee, Saeed Asadi, Madjid Tavana, Mohsen Asadi, and Tracey Oliver. 2016. Autonomous Vehicles: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Implications for Transportation Policies. Journal of Modern Transportation 24 (4): 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Jackson. 2020. JAIC Launches Pilot for Implementing New DOD AI Ethics Principles. FedScoop 2 (April): 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Colin J., and Charles D. Raab. 2017. The Governance of Privacy: Policy Instruments in Global Perspective. London: New York Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bietti, Elettra. 2020. From Ethics Washing to Ethics Bashing: A View on Tech Ethics from within Moral Philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 210–219. FAT* ’20. Barcelona, Spain: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372860.

  • Boddington, Paula. 2017. Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • British Embassy in Mexico, Oxford Insights, and C Minds. 2018. Towards an AI Strategy in Mexico: Harnessing the AI Revolution. Mexico City: British Embassy in Mexico, Oxford Insights, and C Minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokowski, Carolyn. 2018. Do CRISPR Germline Ethics Statements Cut It? The CRISPR Journal 1 (2): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2017.0024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundage, Miles, Shahar Avin, Jack Clark, Helen Toner, Peter Eckersley, Ben Garfinkel, Allan Dafoe, et al. 2018. The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. Future of Humanity Institute, Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, Center for a New American Security, Electronic Frontier Foundation, OpenAI. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cath, Corinne, Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2018. Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: The US, EU, and UK Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2): 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Char, Danton S., Nigam H. Shah, and David Magnus. 2018. Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care – Addressing Ethical Challenges. The New England Journal of Medicine 378 (11): 981–983. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatila, Raja, and John C. Havens. 2019. The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. In Robotics and Well-Being, Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, ed. Maria Isabel Aldinhas Ferreira, João Silva Sequeira, Gurvinder Singh Virk, Mohammad Osman Tokhi, and Endre E. Kadar, 11–16. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12524-0_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Bioethics, Council of Europe. 2015. Statement on Genome Editing Technologies. Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Angela, Thilo Hagendorff, Hui Li, Monique Mann, Vidushi Marda, Ben Wagner, Wei Wang, and Saskia Witteborn. 2019. Artificial Intelligence, Governance and Ethics: Global Perspectives, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3414805. Rochester: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3414805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Michael. 2013. Codes of Ethics. In International Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by Hugh Lafollette, wbiee018. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee018.

  • ———. 2015. Codes of Ethics. In Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Global Resource, ed. J. Britt Holbrook and Carl Mitcham, 2. ed. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Gale, Cengage Learning/Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, Yanqing, John S. Edwards, and Yogesh K. Dwivedi. 2019. Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making in the Era of Big Data – Evolution, Challenges, and Research Agenda. International Journal of Information Management 48 (October): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, Tim, Brent Barron, and Gaga Boskovic. 2018. Building an AI World: Report on National and Regional AI Strategies. Toronto: CIFAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG). 2019. Ethical Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evitt, Niklaus H., Shamik Mascharak, and Russ B. Altman. 2015. Human Germline CRISPR-Cas Modification: Toward a Regulatory Framework. The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12): 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1104160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fast Company. 2017. How Apple, Facebook, Amazon, And Google Use AI To Best Each Other. Fast Company 11 (October): 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fejerskov, Adam Moe. 2017. The New Technopolitics of Development and the Global South as a Laboratory of Technological Experimentation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 42 (5): 947–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917709934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjeld, Jessica, Nele Achten, Hannah Hilligoss, Adam Nagy, and Madhulika Srikumar. 2020. Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3518482. Rochester: Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3518482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, Luciano, and Josh Cowls. 2019. “A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society.” Harvard Data Science Review. June. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1.

  • Frey, Carl Benedikt, and Michael A. Osborne. 2017. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114 (January): 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartenberg, Chaim. 2018. Google Wants to Teach More People AI and Machine Learning with a Free Online Course. The Verge 28 (February): 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert, Martin, Christophe Mondin, and Guillaume Chicoisne. 2018. Montréal Declaration of Responsible AI: 2018 Overview of International Recommendations for AI Ethics. University of Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Daniel, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Luke Stark. 2019. Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer: A Critical Assessment of the Movement for Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Critical and Ethical Studies of Digital and Social Media 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff, Thilo. 2020. The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds & Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8.

  • Hao, Karen. 2019. In 2020, Let’s Stop AI Ethics-Washing and Actually Do Something. MIT Technology Review 27 (December): 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Technology Industry Council. 2017. ITI AI Policy Principles. Washington, DC: Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Business Ethics. 2018. Business Ethics and Artificial Intelligence. 58. Institute for Business Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intel. 2017. Artificial Intelligence: The Public Policy Opportunity. Santa Clara: Intel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila, Krishanu Saha, and J.Benjamin Hurlbut. 2015. CRISPR democracy: Gene editing and the need for inclusive deliberation. Issues in Science and Technology 32: 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobin, Anna, Marcello Ienca, and Effy Vayena. 2019. The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (9): 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Khari. 2019. How AI Companies Can Avoid Ethics Washing. VentureBeat, July 17, 2019, sec. AI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kak, Amba. 2020. ‘The Global South Is Everywhere, but Also Always Somewhere’: National Policy Narratives and AI Justice. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 307–312. AIES ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375859.

  • Ledford, Heidi. 2020. Quest to Use CRISPR against Disease Gains Ground. Nature 577 (7789): 156–156. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03919-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, Jens-Erik. 2016. Big Data Privacy: The Datafication of Personal Information. The Information Society 32 (3): 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1153010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute. 2018. Notes From the AI Frontier: Modeling the Impact of AI on the World Economy. McKinsey Global Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, Andrew, Justin Smith, and Emerson Murphy-Hill. 2018. Does ACM’s code of ethics change ethical decision making in software development? In Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM joint meeting on European software engineering conference and symposium on the foundations of software engineering, 729–733. (Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3264833.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merck. 2017. Genome Editing Technology – Principle. Merck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstadt, Brent. 2019. Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence 1: 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 205395171667967. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, Jessica, Luciano Floridi, Libby Kinsey, and Anat Elhalal. 2019. “From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices.” Science and Engineering Ethics, December. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5.

  • Mozilla Foundation. 2018. Announcing a Competition for Ethics in Computer Science, , with up to $3.5 Million in Prizes. The Mozilla Blog. October 10, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. International Summit on Human Gene Editing: A Global Discussion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21913.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24623.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Tim, Steve Sweetman, Natasha Crampton, and Venky Veeraraghavan. 2020. A Model for Ethical Artificial Intelligence. World Economic Forum 14 (January): 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2019. OECD: Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, OECD/LEGAL/0449. OECD Legal Instruments. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organizing Committee of the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing. 2018. Statement by the Organizing Committee of the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osoba, Osonde A. 2020. Technocultural Pluralism: A ‘Clash of Civilizations’ in Technology?. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 132–137. AIES ’20. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375834.

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2017. Sizing the Prize: What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalise? London: PricewaterhouseCoopers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qatar Center for Artificial Intelligence. 2019. Blueprint: National Artificial Intelligence Strategy for Qatar. Ar-Rayyan: Qatar Center for Artificial Intelligence (QCAI), Qatar Computing Research Institute (QCRI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAP. 2018. SAP’s Guiding Principles for Artificial Intelligence. Waldorf: SAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Matthew U. 2016. Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 29 (2): 353–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, Daniel, Justin Biddle, Jason Borenstein, and Kelly Laas. 2020. What’s Next for AI Ethics, Policy, and Governance? A Global Overview. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 153–158. AIES ’20. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375804.

  • Schiff, Daniel, Jason Borenstein, Kelly Laas and Justin Biddle. 2021. AI Ethics in the Public, Private, and NGO Sectors: A Review of a Global Document Collection. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 2 (1): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2021.3052127.

  • Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. First U.S. edition. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. 2019. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-Being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, First Edition. Piscataway: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Institute for Ethical AI & ML. 2020. The AI-RFX Procurement Framework.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Deborah. 2019. Microsoft Reconsidering AI Ethics Review Plan. Forbes, June 24, 2019, sec. Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villani, Cédric, Marc Schoenauer, Yann Bonnet, Charly Berthet, Anne-Charlotte Cornut, François Levin, and Bertrand Rondepierre. 2018. For a Meaningful Artificial Intelligence: Towards a French and European Strategy. French Parliament. https://frenchamerican.org/young-leader/cedric-villani/

  • Vincent, James. 2019. Finland Is Making Its Online AI Crash Course Free to the World. The Verge 18 (December): 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1949. ‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy. In The Methodology of the Social Sciences, by Max Weber, Edward Shils, and Henry A Finch, 49–112. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Darrell M. 2018. The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Yi, Enmeng Lu, and Cunqing Huangfu. 2018. Linking Artificial Intelligence Principles. ArXiv:1812.04814 [Cs] (December) http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04814.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Daniel S. Schiff, Justin B. Biddle & Jason Borenstein

  2. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA

    Kelly Laas

Authors
  1. Daniel S. Schiff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelly Laas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Justin B. Biddle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jason Borenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel S. Schiff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA

    Kelly Laas

  2. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA

    Michael Davis

  3. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA

    Elisabeth Hildt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schiff, D.S., Laas, K., Biddle, J.B., Borenstein, J. (2022). Global AI Ethics Documents: What They Reveal About Motivations, Practices, and Policies. In: Laas, K., Davis, M., Hildt, E. (eds) Codes of Ethics and Ethical Guidelines. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86201-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation