Skip to main content

Modelling Individual Preferences to Study and Predict Effects of Traffic Policies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Social Good. The PAAMS Collection (PAAMS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12946))

Abstract

Traffic can be viewed as a complex adaptive system in which systemic patterns arise as emergent phenomena. Global behaviour is a result of behavioural patterns of a large set of individual travellers. However, available traffic simulation models lack of concepts to comprehensibly capture preferences and personal objectives as determining factors of individual decisions. This limits predictive power of such simulation models when used to estimate the consequences of new traffic policies. Effects on individuals must not be ignored as these are the basic cause of how the system changes under interventions. In this paper, we present a simulation framework in which the self-interested individual and its decision-making is placed at the center of attention. We use semantic reasoning techniques to model individual decision-making on the basis of personal preferences that determine traffic relevant behaviour. As this initially makes the simulations more complex and opaque the simulation framework also comprises tools to inspect rule evaluation providing a necessary element of explainability. As proof of concept we discuss an example scenario and demonstrate how this type of modelling could help in evaluating the effects of new traffic policies on individual as well as global system behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    see https://github.com/kite-cloud/agade-traffic.

References

  1. Adnan, M.,et al.: Simmobility: a multi-scale integrated agent-based simulation platform. In: 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Forthcoming in Transportation Research Record (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazzan, A., do Amarante, M., Sommer, T., Benavides, A.: Itsumo: an agent-based simulator for its applications. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Artificial Transportation Systems and Simulation, p. 8. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, M., Müller, C., Nüske, N.: Digital nudging in online grocery stores : towards ecologically sustainable nutrition. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2020). AIS Electronic Library, Hyderabad, India (Dezember 2020). https://eref.uni-bayreuth.de/57729/

  4. Dimitropoulos, A., Oueslati, W., Sintek, C.: The rebound effect in road transport: a meta-analysis of empirical studies. Energy Econ. 75, 163–179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.021, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988318302718

  5. Égert, B., Koźluk, T., Sutherland, D.: Infrastructure and growth (mar 2009). https://doi.org/10.1787/225682848268, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/225682848268

  6. Engel, U., Pötschke, M.: Mobilität und verkehrsmittelwahl 1999/2000. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA4203 Datenfile Version 1.0.0 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11591

  7. Erol, K., Levy, R., Wentworth, J.: Application of agent technology to traffic simulation. In: Proceedings of Complex Systems, Intelligent Systems and Interfaces (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrenkopf, T.: Applying semantic technologies to multi-agent models in the context of business simulations. Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh Napier University (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. GfK Consumer Panels: consumers’ choice ’17 - neue Muster in der Ernährung: die Verbindung von Genuss, Gesundheit und Gemeinschaft in einer beschleunigten Welt : eine Publikation anlässlich der Anuga 2017. GfK Consumer Panels and Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Ernährungsindustrie e.V. (2017), https://www.bve-online.de/presse/infothek/publikationen-jahresbericht/consumers-choice-2017

  10. Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What Is an ontology? In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirschauer, N., Lehberger, M., Musshoff, O.: Happiness and utility in economic thought–or: what can we learn from happiness research for public policy analysis and public policy making? Soc. Indicat. Res. 121(3), 647–674 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hotten, R.: Bmw and daimler invest 1bn in new car venture (2019). https://www.bbc.com/news/business-47332805, Accessed 30 Nov 2019

  13. Jung, J., Koo, Y.: Analyzing the effects of car sharing services on the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Sustainability 10(2), 539 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020539

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P., Sarin, R.: Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Q. J. Eono. 112(2), 375–406 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolata, G.: What if they closed 42d street and nobody noticed. New York Times 25, 38 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marczuk, K., et al.: Autonomous mobility on demand in SimMobility: case study of the central business district in Singapore. In: 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM). pp. 167–172. IEEE, July 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccis.2015.7274567

  17. MAVS: Agent-based intelligent traffic simulation system (2015). https://www.utdmavs.org/matisse/. Accessed 25 May 2020

  18. Nguyen, J., Powers, S., Urquhart, N., Farrenkopf, T., Guckert, M.: An overview of agent-based traffic simulators (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen, J., Powers, S., Urquhart, N., Farrenkopf, T., Guckert, M.: Using semantic technology to model persona for adaptable agents. In: ECMS (in press, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oltermann, P.: Activists try to stop autobahn being built through German forest (2020). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/04/activists-try-to-stop-autobahn-being-built-through-german-forest. Accessed 3 Jan 2021

  21. Rossetti, R., Liu, R.: Advances in Artificial Transportation Systems and Simulation. Academic Press, San Diego (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Statista: Lebensmittelkauf in deutschland (2020). https://de.statista.com/statistik/studie/id/12521/dokument/einkauf-und-konsum-von-lebensmitteln-statista-dossier/

  23. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder: Zensus 2011: Methoden und Verfahren. Statistisches Bundesamt. Wiesbaden (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thulasidasan, S., Kasiviswanathan, S., Eidenbenz, S., Galli, E., Mniszewski, S., Romero, P.: Designing systems for large-scale, discrete-event simulations: experiences with the fasttrans parallel microsimulator. In: 2009 International Conference on High Performance Computing (HiPC), pp. 428–437. IEEE, December 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/hipc.2009.5433183

  25. Torabi, B., Al-Zinati, M., Wenkstern, R.Z.: MATISSE 3.0: a large-scale multi-agent simulation system for intelligent transportation systems. In: Demazeau, Y., An, B., Bajo, J., Fernández-Caballero, A. (eds.) PAAMS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10978, pp. 357–360. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94580-4_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Ziemke, D., Nagel, K., Bhat, C.: Integrating CEMDAP and MATSIM to increase the transferability of transport demand models. Transportation Research Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 2493(1), 117–125 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3141/2493-13

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research has been supported by a grant from the Karl-Vossloh-Stiftung (Project Number S0047/10053/2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nguyen, J., Powers, S.T., Urquhart, N., Farrenkopf, T., Guckert, M. (2021). Modelling Individual Preferences to Study and Predict Effects of Traffic Policies. In: Dignum, F., Corchado, J.M., De La Prieta, F. (eds) Advances in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Social Good. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12946. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85739-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85739-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85738-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85739-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics