Skip to main content

A Deep Learning-Based Tool for Automatic Brain Extraction from Functional Magnetic Resonance Images of Rodents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 296))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Removing skull artifacts from functional magnetic images (fMRI) is a well understood and frequently encountered problem. Because the fMRI field has grown mostly due to human studies, many new tools were developed to handle human data. Nonetheless, these tools are not equally useful to handle the data derived from animal studies, especially from rodents. This represents a major problem to the field because rodent studies generate larger datasets from larger populations, which implies that preprocessing these images manually to remove the skull becomes a bottleneck in the data analysis pipeline. In this study, we address this problem by implementing a neural network-based method that uses a U-Net architecture to segment the brain area into a mask and removing the skull and other tissues from the image. We demonstrate several strategies to speed up the process of generating the ground-truth of the dataset using watershedding, and several strategies for data augmentation that allowed to train robustly the U-Net to perform the segmentation. Finally, we deployed the trained network freely available.

S. Pontes-Filho and A. G. Dahl contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tool is available at https://github.com/sidneyp/skull-stripper.

References

  1. Bearer, E.L., Zhang, X., Janvelyan, D., Boulat, B., Jacobs, R.E.: Reward circuitry is perturbed in the absence of the serotonin transporter. Neuroimage 46(4), 1091–1104 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradski, G.: The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb’s J. Softw. Tools 25, 120–125 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buda, M., Saha, A., Mazurowski, M.A.: Association of genomic subtypes of lower-grade gliomas with shape features automatically extracted by a deep learning algorithm. Comput. Biol. Med. 109, 218–225 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delora, A., et al.: A simple rapid process for semi-automated brain extraction from magnetic resonance images of the whole mouse head. J. Neurosci. Meth 257, 185–193 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eskildsen, S.F., et al.: BEaST: brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique. NeuroImage 59(3), 2362–2373 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galdames, F.J., Jaillet, F., Perez, C.A.: An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images. J. Neurosci. Meth. 206(2), 103–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hahn, H.K., Peitgen, H.O.: The skull stripping problem in MRI solved by a single 3D watershed transform. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 134–143. Springer (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40899-4_14

  8. Hahn, S.C., Oberbauer, S.F., Gebauer, R., Grulke, N.E., Lange, O.L., Tenhunen, J.D.: Vegetation structure and aboveground carbon and nutrient pools in the imnavait creek watershed. In: Landscape function and disturbance in Arctic tundra, pp. 109–128. Springer (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01145-4_5

  9. Hwang, H., Rehman, H.Z.U., Lee, S.: 3D U-Net for skull stripping in brain MRI. Appl. Sci. 9(3), 569 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapur, T., Grimson, W.E.L., Wells, W.M., III., Kikinis, R.: Segmentation of brain tissue from magnetic resonance images. Med. Image Anal. 1(2), 109–127 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  12. Malpica, N., et al.: Applying watershed algorithms to the segmentation of clustered nuclei. Cytometry J. Int. Soc. Anal. Cytol. 28(4), 289–297 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Modat, M., McClelland, J., Ourselin, S.: Lung registration using the NiftyReg package. Med. Image Anal. Clinic-A Grand Challenge 33–42, 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moshfeghi, M.: Elastic matching of multimodality medical images. CVGIP: Graph. Models Image Process. 53(3), 271–282 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 234–241. Springer (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

  16. Shattuck, D.W., Leahy, R.M.: BrainSuite: an automated cortical surface identification tool. Med. Image Anal. 6(2), 129–142 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simard, P.Y., Steinkraus, D., Platt, J.C., et al.: Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. In: ICDAR, vol. 3 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, S.M.: Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapp. 17(3), 143–155 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Speier, W., Iglesias, J.E., El-Kara, L., Tu, Z., Arnold, C.: Robust skull stripping of clinical glioblastoma multiforme data. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 659–666. Springer (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_81

  20. Spring, S., Lerch, J.P., Henkelman, R.M.: Sexual dimorphism revealed in the structure of the mouse brain using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 35(4), 1424–1433 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Eede, M.C., Scholz, J., Chakravarty, M.M., Henkelman, R.M., Lerch, J.P.: Mapping registration sensitivity in MR mouse brain images. Neuroimage 82, 226–236 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vousden, D.A., et al.: Whole-brain mapping of behaviourally induced neural activation in mice. Brain Struct. Funct. 220(4), 2043–2057 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, S., et al.: Deep learning based fetal middle cerebral artery segmentation in large-scale ultrasound images. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 532–539. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, X., Bearer, E.L., Boulat, B., Hall, F.S., Uhl, G.R., Jacobs, R.E.: Altered neurocircuitry in the dopamine transporter knockout mouse brain. PloS one 5(7), e11506 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Norwegian Research Council SOCRATES project (grant number 270961) and received internal support as a lighthouse project in Computer Vision from the Faculty of Technology, Art and Design (TKD) at Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sidney Pontes-Filho or Gustavo Borges Moreno e Mello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pontes-Filho, S., Dahl, A.G., Nichele, S., Mello, G.B.M.e. (2022). A Deep Learning-Based Tool for Automatic Brain Extraction from Functional Magnetic Resonance Images of Rodents. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 296. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82199-9_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics