Skip to main content

False Alarm-Improved Detection Capabilities of Multi-sensor-Based Monitoring of Vibrating Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 127))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2186 Accesses

Abstract

Monitoring the State-of-Health of vibrating mechanical systems is useful but complex. Besides challenges associated with dynamical behaviors of the systems monitored, supervision tasks are complex with respect data acquisition, feature extraction, and/or statistical modeling for feature classification. Data acquisition strategy addresses sensor types, quantities, and locations. Feature extraction task details the selection and processing of features sensitive to a change/fault present and if required the development of statistical models for change/fault classification. In this contribution, the above-mentioned challenges associated with supervision are explained and detailed using an elastic mechanical structure applying the Probability of Detection method. Previously solved problems relating to simultaneously accessing all mentioned challenges are briefly repeated for understanding. This serves as a prelude to the newly developed data driven noise analysis and improved detection procedure. An experimental example using different real sensor types in combination with mechanical modifications of an elastic beam is presented. The adapted Probability of Detection method helps to determine a suitable feature, sensor type, and position for least change/fault detection. In this article a new data driven noise analysis approach is introduced to ensure optimal sensor-specific flaw size detection. Optimality in this context is related to the selection of the appropriate feature and threshold values for desired false alarms. The noise analysis permits the selection of a decision threshold (threshold beyond which change/fault is considered present in a signal) with the corresponding detectable flaw size and related false alarm rate. Selecting different sensors implies changing the signal distribution character and the decision threshold. This change results in different values and hence can be exploited to decide the optimal sensor. The implemented noise analysis allows a trade-off between flaw size detection and probability of false characterization of faults with 90% detection at 95% reliability level. The novel approach provides a graphical representation that illustrates the diagnostic capabilities of a sensor as its decision threshold is varied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ko, J.M., Ni, Y.Q.: Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Eng. Struct. 27(12), 1715–1725 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: An introduction to structural health monitoring. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365(1851), 303–315 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fritzen, C.P.: Vibration-based structural health monitoring–concepts and applications. In: Key Engineering Materials, vol. 293, pp. 3–20. Trans Tech Publications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ameyaw, D.A., Rothe, S., Söffker, D.: Adaptation and implementation of Probability of Detection (POD)-based fault diagnosis in elastic structures through vibration-based SHM approach. In: 9th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM), Manchester, 10–13 July 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ameyaw, D.A., Rothe, S., Söffker, D.: A novel feature-based probability of detection assessment and fusion approach for reliability evaluation of vibration-based diagnosis systems. Struct. Health Monit. 19(3), 649–660 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S.W., Nix, D.A.: Vibration–based structural damage identification. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 359(1778), 131–149 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MIL‐HDBK‐1823A: Department of Defense Handbook: Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment. Washington, DC: Department of Defense (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Georgiou, G.A.: PoD curves, their derivation, applications, and limitations. Insight-Non-Destruct. Test. Cond. Monit. 49(7), 409–414 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ginzel, E.: Introduction to the Statistics of NDT. NDE. net–e-J. Nondestruct. Test. 11(5) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aldrin, J.C., Medina, E.A., Lindgren, E.A., Buynak, C.F., Knopp, J.S.: Case studies for model‐assisted probabilistic reliability assessment for structural health monitoring systems. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1335, no. 1, pp. 1589–1596, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. Annis, C.: Statistical best-p ractices for building Probability of Detection (POD) models. R-mh1823, Version, 2(4.4), Florida (2017). http://StatisticalEngineering.com. Accessed 7 Jan 2018

  12. Gandossi, L., Annis, C.: Probability of detection curves: statistical best-practices. ENIQ report 41. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neter, J., Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Wasserman, W.: Book: Applied linear statistical models (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ameyaw, D.A., Rothe, S., Söffker, D.: Probability of detection (POD)-oriented view to fault diagnosis for reliability assessment of FDI approaches. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 51852, p. V008T10A041. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Adofo Ameyaw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ameyaw, D.A., Söffker, D. (2021). False Alarm-Improved Detection Capabilities of Multi-sensor-Based Monitoring of Vibrating Systems. In: Rizzo, P., Milazzo, A. (eds) European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. EWSHM 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 127. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64593-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64594-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics