Skip to main content

Paying the Pink Tax on a Blue Dress - Exploring Gender-Based Price-Premiums in Fashion Recommendations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Centered Software Engineering (HCSE 2020)

Abstract

In the field of Human-Computer Interaction there is considerable awareness on diversity and inclusion. At the same time topics such as gender and race have become more prominent recently. One aspect that has received little attention, however, is the possible reproduction of real-world socio-demographic inequality structures through recommendation systems in fashion. To investigate gender-specific differences in recommender systems, we utilise data from Amazon and use quantile regressions to calculate what price differences exist for the recommended products concerning the primary product. Our results show a bias in recommended pricing premiums about addressed gender. While a higher price in comparison to the viewed product is charged for all genders, product recommendations for women generally show a higher premium than those for men (about 5% more at the median, ceteris paribus). This can be influenced by the starting price and the popularity of the product, i.e. the sales ranking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kotouza, M.T., Tsarouchis, S., Kyprianidis, A.C., Chrysopoulos, A.C., Mitkas, P.A.: Towards fashion recommendation: an AI system for clothing data retrieval and analysis. In: Maglogiannis, I., Iliadis, L., Pimenidis, E. (eds.) AIAI 2020. IAICT, vol. 584, pp. 433–444. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Senecal, S., Nantel, J.: The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. J. Retail. 80, 159–169 (2004). %@ 0022-4359

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bardzell, S.: Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design, pp. 1301–1310 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stumpf, S., et al.: Gender-inclusive HCI research and design: a conceptual review. Found. Trends® Hum.–Comput. Interact. 13, 1–69 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schlesinger, A., Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E.: Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class, pp. 5412–5427 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobsen, K.A.: Rolling back the “Pink Tax”: dim prospects for eliminating gender-based price discrimination in the sale of consumer goods and services. Calif. West. Law Rev. 54, 2 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lafferty, M.: The pink tax: the persistence of gender price disparity. Midwest J. Undergr. Res. 11, 56–72 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens, J.L., Shanahan, K.J.: Structured abstract: anger, willingness, or clueless? Understanding why women pay a pink tax on the products they consume. In: Stieler, M. (ed.) Creating Marketing Magic and Innovative Future Marketing Trends. DMSPAMS, pp. 571–575. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45596-9_108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Yazıcıoğlu, A.E.: Pink Tax and the Law: Discriminating Against Women Consumers. Routledge, Abingdon (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duesterhaus, M., Grauerholz, L., Weichsel, R., Guittar, N.A.: The cost of doing femininity: gendered disparities in pricing of personal care products and services. Gend. Issues 28, 175–191 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-011-9106-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. An der Heiden, I., Wersig, M.: Preisdifferenzierung nach Geschlecht in Deutschland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McAuley, J., Targett, C., Shi, Q., Van Den Hengel, A.: Image-based recommendations on styles and substitutes, pp. 43–52 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. He, R., McAuley, J.: Ups and downs: modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koenker, R., Hallock, K.F.: Quantile regression. J. Econ. Perspect. 15, 143–156 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liston-Heyes, C., Neokleous, E.: Gender-based pricing in the hairdressing industry. J. Consum. Policy 23, 107–126 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006492207450

  16. Whittelsey, F.C.: Why women pay more: how to avoid marketplace perils (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ekstrand, M.D., Tian, M., Kazi, M.R.I., Mehrpouyan, H., Kluver, D.: Exploring author gender in book rating and recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 242–250 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, T.T., Hui, P.-M., Harper, F.M., Terveen, L., Konstan, J.A.: Exploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Islam, R., Keya, K.N., Pan, S., Foulds, J.: Mitigating demographic biases in social media-based recommender systems. In: KDD (Social Impact Track) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kamishima, T., Akaho, S.: Considerations on recommendation independence for a find-good-items task (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abdollahpouri, H.: Popularity Bias in Ranking and Recommendation (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Archak, N., Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Manag. Sci. 57, 1485–1509 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, K., Lee, Y.S., Nam, Y.: A novel approach of making better recommendations by revealing hidden desires and information curation for users of internet of things. Multimed. Tools Appl. 78(3), 3183–3201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6084-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schoinas, I.: Product Recommendation System (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng, Y., Gao, C., He, X., Li, Y., Jin, D.: Price-aware recommendation with graph convolutional networks, pp. 133–144. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goffman, E.: Gender display. In: Goffman, E. (ed.) Gender Advertisements. COMMCU, pp. 1–9. Springer, London (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16079-2_1

  27. Beckmann, C., Gross, T.: Social computing—Bridging the gap between the social and the technical. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) SCSM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8531, pp. 25–36. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07632-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. West, C., Zimmerman, D.H.: Doing gender. Gend. Soc. 1, 125–151 (1987). %@ 0891-2432

    Google Scholar 

  29. Darian, J.C.: Parent‐child decision making in children’s clothing stores. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 26, 421–428 (1998). %@ 0959-0552

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, C.W.S., Li, M., Nguyen, N.T.H., Sriboonchitta, S.: On asymmetric market model with heteroskedasticity and quantile regression. Comput. Econ. 49, 155–174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-015-9550-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hung, W.-T., Shang, J.-K., Wang, F.-C.: Pricing determinants in the hotel industry: quantile regression analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 29, 378–384 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mak, S., Choy, L., Ho, W.: Quantile regression estimates of Hong Kong real estate prices. Urban Stud. 47, 2461–2472 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gross, T.: Group recommender systems in tourism: from predictions to decisions. In: Neidhardt, J., Fesenmaier, D., Kuflik, T., Woerndl, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Recommenders in Tourism - RecTour 2017 - Co-Located with the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems - RecSys 2017, Como, Italien, 27 August, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Aachen, Deutschland, vol. 1906, pp. 40–42 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Beckmann, C., Gross, T.: Towards increased utility of and satisfaction with group recommender systems. In: Berkovsky, S., Herder, E., Lops, P., Santos, O.C. (eds.) Extended Proceedings of the 21st Conference on User Modelling, Adaptation, and Personalisation - UMAP 2013, Rome, Italy, 10–14 June, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Aachen, Germany, vol. 997, pp. 3–5 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Beckmann, C., Gross, T.: AGReMo: providing ad-hoc groups with on-demand recommendations on mobile devices. In: Dittmar, A., Forbrig, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics - ECCE 2011, Rostock, Germany, 24–26 August, pp. 179–183. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lieven, T., Grohmann, B., Herrmann, A., Landwehr, J.R., Van Tilburg, M.: The effect of brand gender on brand equity. Psychol. Mark. 31, 371–385 (2014). %@ 0742-6046

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Brand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brand, A., Gross, T. (2020). Paying the Pink Tax on a Blue Dress - Exploring Gender-Based Price-Premiums in Fashion Recommendations. In: Bernhaupt, R., Ardito, C., Sauer, S. (eds) Human-Centered Software Engineering. HCSE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12481. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64266-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64266-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64265-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64266-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics