Abstract
One of the biggest challenges in ICT-mediated learning models, such as e-learning and b-learning, is the process of skills assessment. Specifically during the elaboration of random questionnaires based on question banks in Learning Management Systems (LMS), where difficulties such as misspellings or conceptual errors arise. This can make questions difficult for students to understand, and therefore, the possibility of answering wrong by accident. In addition, sometimes questions are not organized by topics or levels of difficulty, which can lead to exams on topics not yet seen in class, or questionnaires with the wrong difficulty level among students in the same course. To reduce this problem, we developed a peer review tool for evaluating and adjusting questions and then exporting them to an LMS as a question bank, organized by topic and difficulty level. This work shows the structure of such a tool, and first validation results for impact and quality using double-blind testing in questionnaire design for a course taught at a higher education institution in Colombia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barberà, E.: Aportaciones de la tecnología a la e-Evaluación Technological contributions to e-Assessment Introducción. RED. Revista de Investigación a Distancia, pp. 1–13 (2005)
Bécue Bertaut, M.: Análisis estadístico de datos de encuestas. Tratamiento conexo de respuestas a preguntas abiertas y cerradas. Papers. Revista de Sociologia 37, 113 (1991). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v37n0.1599
Belloch, C.: Entornos Virtuales de Aprendizaje. Unidad de Tecnología Educativa (UTE). Universidad de Valencia, pp. 1–9 (2009)
Blosser, P.E.: How to ... Ask the Right Questions. National Science Teachers Association, Nov ember 2015. https://doi.org/10.2505/9780873551021
Rafael, C.J.: Evaluación del aprendizaje en espacios virtuales -TIC. Ediciones Uninorte (2011)
Carnoy, M.: Las TIC en la enseñanza: posibilidades y retos. Lección inaugural del curso académico 10(1), 20 (2004)
Cuervo-Arango, M.A.: Metodología de cuestionarios: Principios y aplicaciones. Boletín de la Anabad 43(3), 263–272 (1993)
Fernández, F.: La evaluación y su importancia en la educación. Distancia por tiempos (2018). https://educacion.nexos.com.mx/?p=1016
Fernández Núñez, L.: ¿Cómo se elabora un cuestionario? Bulletí LaRecerca 1(2002), 1–9 (2007). ISSN 1886–1964
García-Martínez, R., Lage, F., Pessaq, R., Cataldi, Z.: Metodología extendida para la creación de software educativo desde una visión integradora. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa 2(1), 1–32 (2003)
García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A.: Open source solutions for knowledge management and technological ecosystems. IGI Global, October 2016. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0905-9
García-Peñalvo, F.J., Seoane Pardo, A.M.: Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning. Décimo Aniversario. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) 16(1), 119 (2015). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A.: The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(9), 2047–2059 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552
Informatik, A., Manente, D., Schaefer, S., Koch, P.F.: Moodle Plugin StudentQuiz Bachelorarbeit. HSR Hochschule für Technik Rapperswil, Bachelorarbeit (2017)
Jefferson, R., Arnold, L.: Effects of virtual education on academic culture: perceived advantages and disadvantages. Online Submission 6(3), 61–66 (2009)
Koufetta-Menicou, C., Scaife, J.: Teachers’ questions - types and significance in science education. Sch. Sci. Rev. 81(296), 79–84 (2000)
Lezcano, L., Vilanova, G.: Instrumentos de evaluación de aprendizaje en entornos virtuales. Perspectiva de estudiantes y aportes de docentes. Informes Científicos Técnicos - UNPA 9(1), 1–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22305/ict-unpa.v9i1.235
Luxton-Reilly, A., Lewis, A., Plimmer, B.: Comparing sequential and parallel code review techniques for formative feedback. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 45–52. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA, January 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3160489.3160498
Marmolejo, E.K., Wilder, D.A., Bradley, L.: A preliminary analysis of the effects of response cards on student performance and participation in an upper division university course. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 37(3), 405–410 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-405
Medved, J.: LMS Industry User Research Report (2017). http://www.capterra.com/learning-management-system-software/user-research
Mirzakhani, M., Ashrafzadeh, H., Ashrafzadeh, A.: The virtual university: advantages and disadvantages. In: ICDLE 2010–2010 4th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education, Proceedings, pp. 32–36 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDLE.2010.5606048
Moodle: Moodle - Open-source learning platform \(|\) Moodle.org (2018). https://moodle.org/
O’Donoghue, J., Singh, G., Dorward, L.: Virtual education in universities: a technological imperative. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 32(5), 511–523 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00221
Roldán López, N.: Ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje (AVAS): ¿Cómo quieren aprender los estudiantes? Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte 1(19) (2011)
Salinas Quiroz, J.: Diseño y moderación de entornos virtuales de aprendizaje (EVA). Editorial UOC (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya), S.L, Barcelona (2011)
Slavin, R.E.: Student teams and comparison among equals: effects on academic performance and student attitudes. J. Educ. Psychol. 70(4), 532–538 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.4.532
Stowell, J.R., Nelson, J.M.: Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teach. Psychol. 34(4), 253–258 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701700391
UNESCO: El Coronavirus COVID-19 y la educación superior: impacto y recomendaciones - UNESCO-IESALC (2020). https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/2020/04/02/el-coronavirus-covid-19-y-la-educacion-superior-impacto-y-recomendaciones/
Vera, J.: Valor Pedagógico De La Evaluación Mediada Por Las Tic. Technical report, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia (2013)
Wilson, G., Randall, M.: The implementation and evaluation of a new learning space: a pilot study. Res. Learn. Technol. 20(2) (2012). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14431
Zhang, D., Zhao, J.L., Zhou, L., Nunamaker, J.F.: Can e-learning replace classroom learning? (may 2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/986213.986216
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sanchez-Martin, A. et al. (2020). Peer Validation and Generation Tool for Question Banks in Learning Management Systems. In: Florez, H., Misra, S. (eds) Applied Informatics. ICAI 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1277. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61702-8_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61702-8_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61701-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61702-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)