Skip to main content

Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Research Pathways Based on Empirical Evidence from Chinese Automotive Companies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pursuing Sustainability

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 301))

  • 664 Accesses

Abstract

China’s current development model presents an over-emphasis on short-term economic gains over long-term sustainable development. As business activities play a crucial role in creating and solving such problems, firms are increasingly encouraged to take the initiative to contribute to the future. However, most companies in emerging economies are competing in the world market based on cost advantages. These firms, being predominantly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with limited resources, tend to favour short-term financial gains over long-term sustainability. It is clear that firms with a short-sighted focus on economic gains are not truly sustainable and those aiming for sustaining success need to balance various sustainability initiatives to meet current targets without compromising future prosperity. This chapter aims to provide insights on the status quo of sustainable development in the context of emerging economies’ manufacturing sector. A systematic review of theories and empirical studies was conducted to clarify the research pathways on sustainability. Case studies with eight Chinese automotive companies were also carried out, and future research directions are proposed based on the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adebambo, H. O., Abdulkadir, R. I., Mat, N. K. N., Alkafaagi, A. A. J., & Kanaan, A. G. J. (2013). Drivers of sustainable environmental manufacturing practices and financial performance among food and beverages companies in Malaysia. American Journal of Economics, 3, 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20, s9–s24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amini, A., & Bienstock, C. C. (2014). Corporate sustainability: An integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2016). Operations management and the resource based view: Another view. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M., & Park, J. (2017). Extending the resource-based view: Effects of strategic orientation toward community on small business performance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 302–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A. (2004). Assessing core intangible resources. European Management Journal, 22, 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda, G., & Vera, D. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research, 60, 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D., & Kuo, L. R. (2008). The effects of sustainable development on firms’ financial performance – An empirical approach. Sustainable Development, 16, 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, R. W. (2005). The lessons from stakeholder theory for US business leaders. Business Horizons, 48, 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1072–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple-bottom-line of the 21st century. Stoney Creek: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraj, E., Martinez, E., & Matute, F. (2013). Green marketing in B2B organizations: An empirical analysis from the natural-resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28, 396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garces-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., & Murillo-Luna, J. L. (2012). Stakeholder pressure and environmental proactivity: Moderating effect of competitive advantage expectations. Management Decision, 50, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2014). Impact of supply chain management practices on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajmohammad, S., Vachon, S., Klassen, R. D., & Gavronski, I. (2013). Lean management and supply management: Their role in green practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural resource based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37, 1464–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Xu, K., & Carnes, C. M. (2016). Resource based theory in operations management research. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, K. H., Theyel, G., & Wood, C. H. (2012). Identifying firm capabilities as drivers of environmental management and sustainability practices – Evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 530–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, J., Schilke, O., & Brettel, M. (2013). Social capital as a microlevel origin of organizational capabilities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurapatskie, B., & Darnall, N. (2013). Which corporate sustainability activities are associated with greater financial payoffs? Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, W.-H., Lin, C.-C., & Wang, T.-C. (2015). Exploring the interoperability of innovation capability and corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 68, 867–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzzini, D., Brandon-Jones, E., Brandon-Jones, A., & Spina, G. (2015). From sustainability commitment to performance: The role of intra- and inter-firm collaborative capabilities in the upstream supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 998–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. D., Tsarenko, Y., Ferraro, C., & Sands, S. (2015). Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of leaning strategy. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1974–1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov, A., Blass, V., & Raz, G. (2014). Economic and environmental assessment of remanufacturing strategies for product + service firms. Production and Operations Management, 23, 744–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G., & Shah, R. (2008). Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 730–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, M. E., Maloni, M. J., & Carter, C. R. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45, 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reverte, C., Gomez-Melero, E., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: Evidence from eco-responsible Spanish firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2870–2884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V. (2009). Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, A. W., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr, T. (2012). The role of environmental management in sustainable business development: A multi-country investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafiq, A., Klassen, R. D., Johnson, F., & Awaysheh, A. (2014). Socially responsible practices: An exploratory study on scale development using stakeholder theory. Decision Sciences, 45, 683–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomsic, N., Bojnec, S., & Simcic, B. (2015). Corporate sustainability and economic performance in small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. W. Y., Lai, K., Shang, K., Lu, C., & Leung, T. K. P. (2012). Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Q., He, Q., Duan, Y., & O’Regan, N. (2012a). Implementing dynamic capabilities for corporate strategic change toward sustainability. Strategic Change, 21, 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. J., Melnyk, S. A., & Swink, M. (2012b). An empirical investigation of the combinatorial nature of operational practices and operational capabilities – Compensatory or additive? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 121–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M. D., Liu, C., Lai, K., & Pawar, K. S. (2015). The impact of integrated practices of lean, green, and social management systems on firm sustainability performance – Evidence from Chinese fashion auto-parts suppliers. Sustainability, 7, 3838–3858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. G., Hong, P., & Modi, S. B. (2011). Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. International Journal o Production Economics, 129, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 19, 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wu, L., Subramanian, N. (2021). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Research Pathways Based on Empirical Evidence from Chinese Automotive Companies. In: Chen, C., Chen, Y., Jayaraman, V. (eds) Pursuing Sustainability. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 301. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58023-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics