Process Management Model Aligned to the Civil Service Law in Public Entities of Peru

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1253)


In Peru, under the framework of the National Policy for the Modernization of public management by 2021, it is intended that state institutions enter the Civil Service Regime that seeks to continuously improve the public administration in order to avoid disorder in hiring, remuneration excessive, breaches of the rights of the servers, among others, which are currently causing delays and poor service to citizens. For this reason, a management model is proposed that allows integrating the guidelines set forth by the Law of Civil Service and the process improvement techniques that will allow the current situation to be identified, prioritizing which are the critical processes and thus being able to define an improvement plan integrating the different areas within the institution.


Process management Law of Civil Service Critical processes 


  1. 1.
    Minagri: Ley Marco de Modernización de la Gestión del Estado. LEY Nº 27658 (2002).
  2. 2.
    Servir: Ley del Servicio Civil. LEY N° 30057 (2017).
  3. 3.
    Servir: Resolución de presidencia ejecutiva N° 316-2017-SERVIR/PE (2017).
  4. 4.
    Ramdass, K., Pretorius, L.: Comparative assessment of process improvement methodologies: a case study in the South African clothing industry. In: 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (2008).
  5. 5.
    Alharithy, M.: Knowledge management process in several organizations: analytical study of modeling and several processes. In: International Conference on Communication, Management and Information Technology, ICCMIT 2015 (2015); Procedia Comput. Sci. 65, 726–733 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Formento, H.R., Chiodi, F.J., et al.: Key factors for a continuous improvement process. Indep. J. Manage. Prod. (IJM&P) 4, 391–415 (2013). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jevgeni, S., Eduard, S., Roman, Z.: Framework for continuous improvement of production processes and product throughput. In: 25th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, DAAAM 2014 (2015); Procedia Eng. 100, 511–519 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chourabi, H., Mellouli, S., Bouslama, F.: Modeling e-government business processes: new approaches to transparent and efficient performance. Inf. Polit. 14(2009), 91–109 (2009). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alvarado, L., Díaz, J., Quiroz, J., Raymundo, C.: Basic production planning and control model based on process management to increase the productivity of mango MSEs in Casma. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds.) IHIET 2019. AISC, vol. 1018, pp. 871–877. Springer, Cham (2020). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muñante, A., Reyes, F., Sotelo, F., Raymundo, C.: Management model for pecan production using process tools in an MSE in Peru. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds.) IHIET 2019. AISC, vol. 1018, pp. 903–909. Springer, Cham (2020). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henríquez-Alvarado, F., Luque-Ojeda, V., Macassi-Jauregui, I., Alvarez, J.M., Raymundo-Ibañez, C.: Process optimization using lean manufacturing to reduce downtime: case study of a manufacturing SME in Peru. ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser., 261–265 (2019).
  12. 12.
    Servir: Resolución de presidencia ejecutiva N° 307-2017-SERVIR-PE (2018).

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dirección de InvestigacionesUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias AplciadasLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations