Advertisement

Wellbeing and the Four Qualities of Life

Chapter
  • 31 Downloads
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 82)

Abstract

In his seminal The Four Qualities of Life: Ordering Concepts and Measures of the Good Life, Ruut Veenhoven (2000) provides a conceptual matrix that helps organise concepts, theories and measures related to the good life. Then as now, terms like wellbeing, quality of life, happiness, and the good life are used and understood in a variety of ways across and even within academic disciplines. Veenhoven’s (2000) conceptual matrix—Four Qualities of Life—is revisited here in order to assess its suitability for various purposes and to attempt to build on it to better suit the purposes of policy makers and especially western philosophers of wellbeing.

References

  1. Arneson, R. J. (1999). Human flourishing verses desire satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy, 16(1), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction into the principles of morals and legislation. In The collected works of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunekreef, B., & Holgate, S. T. (2002). Air pollution and health. The Lancet, 360(9341), 1233–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crisp, R. (Ed.). (2014). Aristotle: Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crisp, R. (2017). Well-being. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2017 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/well-being/.
  7. Durand, M. (2015). The OECD better life initiative: How’s life? And the measurement of well-being. Review of Income and Wealth, 61(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heathwood, C. (2016). Desire-fulfillment theory. In The Routledge handbook of philosophy of well-being (pp. 135–147). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Howell, R. T., Kern, M. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review, 1(1), 83–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Joshanloo, M., & Weijers, D. (2019). A two-dimensional conceptual framework for understanding mental well-being. PLoS One, 14(3), e0214045.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214045.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Kagan, S. (1998). Normative ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lane, R. E. (1994). Quality of life and quality of persons: A new role for government? Political Theory, 22(2), 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ludwigs, K., Henning, L., & Arends, L. R. (2019). Measuring happiness—A practical review. In Y. Kee, S. J. Lee, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Perspectives on community well-being (pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Lukas, M. (2010). Desire satisfactionism and the problem of irrelevant desires. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 4(2), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marmot, M., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (2005). Social determinants of health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill, 1957.Google Scholar
  17. Musschenga, A. W. (1994). Quality of life and handicapped people. In L. Nordenfelt (Ed.), Concepts and measurement of quality of life in health care (pp. 181–198). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Human capabilities, female human beings. In M. C. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture and development: A study of human capabilities (pp. 61–104). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nussbaum, M. C. (2008). Who is the happy warrior? Philosophy poses questions to psychology. The Journal of Legal Studies, 37(S2), S81–S113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. OECD. (2015). How’s life? 2015: Measuring wellbeing. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/how_life-2015-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  22. Roche, T. (2019). The practical life, the contemplative life, and the perfect Eudaimonia in Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics 10.7–8. Logos & Episteme, 10(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sen, A. (1992). Capability and well-being. In A. Sen & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weijers, D. (2011). Hedonism. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/hedonism/.
  26. Weijers, D. (2020). Teaching well-being/quality of life from a philosophical perspective. In G. Tonon (Ed.), Teaching quality of life in different domains (pp. 15–42). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weijers, D., & Mukherjee, U. (2016). Living standards, wellbeing, and public policy. The New Zealand Treasury. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/government/longterm/fiscalposition/2016/ltfs-16-bg-lswpp.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaikatoWaikatoNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations