Skip to main content

Contribution of Social Tagging to Clustering Effectiveness Using as Interpretant the User’s Community

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2020)

Abstract

In this article we discuss how social tagging can be used to improve the methodology used for clustering evaluation. We analyze the impact of the integration of tags in the clustering process and its effectiveness. Following the semiotic theory, the own nature of tags allows the reflection of which ones should be considered depending on the interpretant (community of users, or tag writer). Using a case with the community of users as the interpretant, our novel clustering algorithm (k-C), which is based on community detection on a network of tags, was compared with the standard k-means algorithm. The results indicate that the k-C algorithm created more effective clusters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Huang, A.W., Chuang, T.: Social tagging, online communication, and Peircean semiotics: a conceptual framework. J. Inf. Sci. 35, 340–357 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunha, E., Figueira, Á., Mealha, Ó.: Clustering documents using tagging communities and semantic proximity. In: 8th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Lisboa, Portugal, vol. I, pp. 591–596 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cunha, E., Figueira, Á., Mealha, Ó.: Clustering and classifying text documents - a revisit to tagging integration methods. In: 5th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and information Retrieval (KDIR 2013), Vila Moura, Portugal, pp. 160–168 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fortunato, S., Castellano, C.: Community structure in graphs. In: Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, pp. 1141–1163 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, no. 12, pp. 7821–7826 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wakita, K., Tsurumi, T.: Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Alberta, Canada, pp. 1275–1276. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69(2), 026113 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clauset, A., Newman, M.E.J., Moore, C.: Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E 70, 066111 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacQueen, J.B.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 281–297. University of California Press (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arthur, D., Vassilvitskii, S.: k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 1027–1035 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman, R., Sanger, J.: The Text Mining Handbook Advanced Approaches in Analyzing Unstructured Data, 1st edn., p. 410. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhong, S.: Efficient online spherical k-means clustering. In: Prokhorov, D. (eds.) Proceeding of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2005) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Demsar, J.: Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 1–30 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financed by National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia within project: UID/EEA/50014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Álvaro Figueira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cunha, E., Figueira, Á. (2020). Contribution of Social Tagging to Clustering Effectiveness Using as Interpretant the User’s Community. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S., Orovic, I., Moreira, F. (eds) Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45688-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics