Advertisement

Escherichia coli (E. coli) as an Indicator of Fecal Contamination in Groundwater: A Review

Conference paper
  • 117 Downloads
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Escherichia coli or E. coli bacteria is related with the coliform group and is a more accurate fecal contamination indicator than other coliform bacteria; its existence indicates the potential presence of harmful bacteria causing diseases, and also indicates the extent and nature of the pollutants. E. coli bacteria can live in water for 4–12 weeks and currently serve as an indicator bacteria of fecal contamination in drinking water, due to the accessibility of simple, inexpensive, fast, sensitive, and precise detection techniques. According to the laboratory experiment based techniques, 24–48 hours are required for the bacterial concentration to be reported. Continuous monitoring of water quality is required. Techniques are not yet available to classify many pathogenic bacterial strains, and it sometimes takes days to weeks to achieve the results. To overcome these challenges, cost-effective and time-consuming techniques are needed to detect, count, and identify specific bacterial strains. Public health depends on online water quality monitoring, which is dependent mainly on analyzing fecal indicator bacteria, and health safety requires an indicator of fecal contamination so that it is not necessary to examine drinking water to overcome waterborne disease-related problems. This paper will brief the classification, sources, survival of E. coli bacteria, and their correlation with groundwater water quality parameters.

Keywords

Escherichia coli E. coli Indicator E. coli bacteria Water Bacteriological analysis FCB Classification 

References

  1. Anastasi EM, Matthews B, Stratton HM, Katouli M (2012) Pathogenic Escherichia coli found in sewage treatment plants and environmental waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5536–5541Google Scholar
  2. Baudišová D (1997) Evaluation of escherichia coli as the main indicator of faecal pollution. Water Sci Technol 35:333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergey DH, Deehan SJ (1908) The colon-aerogenes group of bacteria. J Med Res 19:175–200Google Scholar
  4. Boehm A, Sassoubre LM (2014) Enterococci as indicators of environmental contamination. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (eds) Commensals to leading to causes of drug resistant infections. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, p 101Google Scholar
  5. Boualam M, Mathieu L, Fass S, Cavard J, Gatel D (2002) Relationship between coliform culturability and organic matter in low nutritive waters. Water Resour 36:2618–2626Google Scholar
  6. Boualam M, Fass S, Saby S, Lahoussine V, Cavard J, Gatel D, Mathieu L (2003) Organic matter quality and survival of coliforms in low-nutrient waters. J Am Water Works Assoc 95:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burton GA, Gunnison D, Lanza JR (1987) Survival of pathogenic bacteria in various freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabral JPS (2010) Water microbiology. Bacterial pathogens and water. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7:3657–3703Google Scholar
  9. CBHI National Health Profile (2018) 13th issueGoogle Scholar
  10. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture (2007) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London and International Water Management Institute, ColomboGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornejova T, Venglovsky J, Gregova G, Kmetova M, Kmet V (2015) Extended spectrum betalactamases in escherichia coli from municipal wastewater. Ann Agric Environ Med 22:447–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. David MM, Haggard BE (2011) Development of regression-based models to predict fecal bacteria numbers at select sites within the Illinois River watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut 215:525–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dooge JCI (2001) Integrated management of water resources. In: Ehlers E, Krafft T (eds) Understanding the earth system: compartments, processes, and interactions. Springer, Heidelberg, p 116Google Scholar
  14. Doran JW, Linn DM (1979) Bacteriological quality of runoff water from pasteureland. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:985–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorevitch S, Pratap P, Wroblewski M, Hryhorczuk DO, Li H, Liu LC, Scheff PA (2012) Health risks of limited-contact water recreation. Environ Health Perspect 120:192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eichmiller JJ, Hicks R, Sadowsky MJ (2013) Distribution of genetic markers of fecal pollution on a freshwater sandy shoreline in proximity to wastewater effluent. Environ Sci Technol 47:3395–3402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellie LB (2007) The correlation of fecal coliform and turbidity of the little Tallapoosa River in the West Georgia Region. In: GSA Denver annual meeting, 28–31 Oct 2007Google Scholar
  18. EPA (2009) Source water protection practices bulletin. Managing stormwater runoff to prevent contamination of drinking water; Office of Water (4606); United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerald P (2011) Water science. University of Washington. Available Online at http://faculty.washington.edu/ghp/researcthemes/water-science
  20. Hendricks CW (1978) Exceptions to the coliform and the fecal coliform tests. In: Berg G (eds) Indicators of viruses in water and food. Ann Arbor Sci 99–145 (Ann Arbor, MI)Google Scholar
  21. Hughes KA (2003) Influence of seasonal environmental variables on the distribution of presumptive fecal coliforms around an antarctic research station. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4884–4891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. India Water Portal (2019) Available Online at https://www.indiawaterportal.org/
  23. Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification (2012) (Second Revision), IS 10500:2012Google Scholar
  24. Juhna T (2007) Effect of phosphorus on survival of escherichia coli in drinking water biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3755–3758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalantari N, Ghaffari S (2008) Evaluation of toxicity of heavy metals for Escherichia coli growth. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 5:173–178Google Scholar
  26. Kim C (2000) Roles of oxidation–reduction potential in electrolyzed oxidizing and chemically modified water for the inactivation of food-related pathogens. J Food Prot 63:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim C, Wilkins K, Bowers M, Wynn C, Ndegwa E (2018) Influence of pH and temperature on growth characteristics of leading foodborne pathogens in a laboratory medium and select food beverages. Austin Food Sci 3:1031Google Scholar
  28. Kreske AC (2008) Effects of pH, dissolved oxygen, and ionic strength on the survival of escherichia coli O157:H7 in organic acid solutions. J Food Prot 71:2404–2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacConkey A (1909) Further observations on the differentiation of lactose-fermenting bacilli with special reference to those of intestinal origin. J Hydrol 9:86–103Google Scholar
  30. Madoux-Humery A-S, Dorner S, Sauve S, Aboulfadl K, Galarneau M, Servais P, Prevost M (2016) The effects of combined sewer overflow on riverine sources of drinking water. Water Resour 92:218–227Google Scholar
  31. Medema GJ, Shaw S, Waite M, Snozzi M, Morreau A, Grabow W (2003) Catchment characteristics and source water quality. In: WHO, OECD (eds) Assessing microbial safety of drinking water. Improving approaches and method. IWA Publishing, pp 111–158Google Scholar
  32. Monk JM (2013) Genome-scale metabolic reconstructions of multiple Escherichia coli strains highlight strain-specific adaptations to nutritional environments. In: Presented at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 10 Dec 2013Google Scholar
  33. Nevers M, Boehm A (2011) Modeling fate and transport of fecal bacteria in surface water. In: Sadowsky M, Whitman R (eds) The fecal bacteria. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp 165–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pandey PK, Kass PH, Supir ML, Biswas S, Singh VP (2014) Contamination of water resources by pathogenic bacteria. AMB Express 4:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park H (2004) Effects of chlorine and pH on efficacy of electrolyzed water for inactivating escherichia coli O157:H7 and listeria monocytogenes. Int J Food Microbiol 91:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Payus C, Haziqah N, Basri N, Wan VL (2018) Faecal bacteria contaminations in untreated drinking water (Groundwater well and hill water) from rural community areas, pp 215–218Google Scholar
  37. Price GR, Wildeboer D (2017) E-coli as an indicator of contamination and health risk in environmental waters. Recent advances on physiology, pathogenesis and biotechnological applications, pp 125–139Google Scholar
  38. Rompré A, Servais P, Baudart J, de-Roubin MR, Laurent P (2002) Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches. J Microbiol Methods 49:31–54Google Scholar
  39. Roslev P, Bjergbæk LA, Hesselsoe M (2004) Effect of oxygen on survival of faecal pollution indicators in drinking water. J Appl Microbiol 96:938–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sinaga DM, Robson MG, Gasong BT, Halel AG, Pertiwi D (2016) Fecal coliform bacteria and factors related to its growth at the sekotong shallow wells, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Public Health Indonesia 2:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tallon P, Magajna B, Lofranco C, Leung KT (2005) Microbial indicators of faecal contamination in water: a current perspective. Water Air Soil Pollut 139–166Google Scholar
  42. Than AA (2011) Effect of temperatures on the growth of Escherichia coli from water. Univ Res J 4:163Google Scholar
  43. WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. WHO, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization (2017) Diarrhoeal disease. Available Online at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs330/en
  45. World Health Statistics (2017) WHOGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringBITS PilaniPilaniIndia

Personalised recommendations