Abstract
This chapter develops Italian critical theorist Giorgio Agamben’s scattered notes on the university by articulating them with his notion of an institutional apparatus. The author argues that the university is currently an apparatus expressing the extreme tendencies of capitalism through the dominant logic of learning. Yet all is not lost. Within the university there remains a weak power that can suspend learning just enough to return the university to its potentiality. The study group is one such subaltern educational practice. Its redemptive powers come from its unique location (the university’s undercommons), its activity (appropriating the infrastructure of the university), and subjectivity of the studier (caught between being tired and being exhausted). The article closes with a short protocol for how to start up a study group of one’s own.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agamben, G. (1995). Idea of Prose. New York: SUNY Press.
Agamben, G. (2007a). Infancy and history: On the destruction of experience. London: Verso.
Agamben, G. (2007b). Profanations. London: Zone Books.
Agamben, G. (2009). What is an apparatus? Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Backer, D.I., & Lewis, T.E. (2015). The studious university: A Marxist-Psychoanalytic groundwork. Cultural Politics, 11(3), 329–344.
D’Hoest, F., & Lewis, T.E. (2015). Exhausting the fatigue university: In search of a biopolitics of research. Ethics and Education, 10(1), 49–60.
Ferguson, R.A. (2012). The reorder of things: The university and its pedagogies of minority difference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning and black study. New York: Minor Compositions.
Kishik, D. (2015). The Manhattan project: A theory of a city. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lewis, T.E. (2017). Inoperative learning: A radical rethinking of educational potentialities. New York: Routledge.
Matthew, P. A. (2016, November 23). What is faculty diversity worth to a university?. Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/11/what-is-faculty-diversity-worth-to-a-university/508334/. Accessed 12 February 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewis, T.E. (2020). Profaning the University Apparatus: A Plea for Study Groups. In: Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., Zamojski, P. (eds) Post-critical Perspectives on Higher Education. Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45019-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45019-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45018-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45019-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)