Endosulfan Pesticide Dissipation and Residue Levels in Khat and Onion in a Sub-humid Region of Ethiopia
- 41 Downloads
Endosulfan, a mixture of α- and β-isomers, is used by farmers in the wet and dry season for khat and onion production. Khat leaf samples were collected in farmer fields at intervals of 1 h; 1, 5, 9 and 14 d after application. The dissipation rate of α- and β-isomers and residue level in khat were compared with residue levels in onion. The extraction was done by using Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) method and analyzed by Gas Chromatography – Electron Capture Detector (GC-ECD). Greater residue α- and β-isomer endosulfan levels were found in khat compared to onion as khat leaves are sprayed repeatedly in two week. Residue levels of khat exceeded the tolerable EU limit of 0.05 mg.kg−1 for leafy vegetables and herbs. For both raw and processed onion sample α- and β-endosulfan residues level were below the tolerable of limit EU regulation for bulb vegetables (i.e. 0. 1 mg.kg−1). The mean half-life for the α-isomer of endosulfan was 3.4 d in the wet season and 3.6 d in the dry season whilst that for the β-isomer was 5.0 d and 5.4 d respectively. Both isomers dissipated fastest in the wet season under conditions of high humidity and precipitation. The β-isomer persisted longer and had a lower dissipation rate from plants surface compared to the α-isomer.
KeywordsPesticide Endosulfan Dissipation Residue Khat Onion Ethiopia East Africa Sub-humid tropical
The study was made possible through the support of the Feed the Future Evaluation of the Relationship between Sustainably Intensified Production Systems and Farm Family Nutrition (SIPS-IN) project (AID-OAA-L-14-00006), a cooperative research project implemented through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in support of the Feed the Future (FtF) program. The study did not apply pesticides, but monitored the fate of pesticides from farmer application. The research was implemented under a collaborative partnership between the International Water Management Institute and Bahir Dar University. The contents of the paper are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government.
- 2.Mahapatro, G., Panigrahi, M.: The case for banning endosulfan. Curr. Sci. 104(11), 1476–1479 (2013)Google Scholar
- 10.Dessie, G.: Is Khat a Social Ill? Ethical Argument About a Stimulant Among the Learned Ethiopians. African Studies Centre, Leiden (2013)Google Scholar
- 20.Takele, S.A.T., Schmitter, P., Atanaw, F.: Evaluation of shallow ground water recharge and irrigation practices at Robit watershed. Department of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Technology, School Of Graduate Studies, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar (2019)Google Scholar
- 22.Sutherland, T.D., Horne, I., Weir, K.M., Russell, R.J., Oakeshott, J.G.: Toxicity and residues of endosulfan isomers. In: Ware, G.W. (ed.) Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 183, pp. 99–113. Springer, New York (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9100-3_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.USEPA: Method 508 Determination of Chlorinated Pesticides in Water by Gas Chromatography with an Electron Capture Detector, USEPA, Editor (1995)Google Scholar
- 27.EU, Commission Regulation: European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for aldicarb, bromopropylate, chlorfenvinphos, endosulfan, EPTC, ethion, fenthion, fomesafen, methabenzthiazuron, methidathion, simazine, tetradifon and triforine in or on certain products Text with EEA (2011)Google Scholar
- 29.Edwards, C.: Factors that affect the persistence of pesticides in plants and soils. In: Pesticide Chemistry–3, pp. 39–56. Elsevier (1975)Google Scholar
- 35.Gerald, E., Brust, K.L.E., Marine, S.: Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations, U.o.M. EXTENSION, Editor (2015)Google Scholar
- 37.Inonda, R., et al.: Determination of pesticide residues in locally consumed vegetables in Kenya. Afr. J. Pharmacol. Ther. 4(1), 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar