Advertisement

Co-learning in a Digital Community: Information Literacy and Views on Learning in Pre-school Teacher Education

  • Fredrik HanellEmail author
Conference paper
  • 208 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12051)

Abstract

Through analysing how different views on learning enable pre-school teacher students to distinguish and use affordances offered by digital tools and the learning environment, this paper seeks to connect modes of appropriation, identity positions and information activities to types of information literacy. Identity, particularly views on learning, is analysed to find out how a Facebook group to some students remains a sustainable digital community throughout teacher education. The paper reports results from a netnographical study conducted between 2012 and 2015. The material used in the analysis consists primarily of 12 semi-structured student interviews and 6 teacher interviews. In the thematic analysis, a socio-cultural perspective on identity is applied. The concept affordance is used to analyse how identity is connected to use of digital tools and the learning environment. The findings show how the appropriation of the Facebook group is connected to identity positions and views on learning in two types of information literacy: a relational information literacy and a pragmatic information literacy. The normative function of co-learning is found to be an important aspect of the learning environment of pre-school teacher education that explains why the digital community can be experienced as either including or excluding.

Keywords

Information literacy Pre-school teacher education Identity Learning Social media 

References

  1. 1.
    Cuban, L.: Oversold and Underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Player-Koro, C.: ‘Roll-out neoliberalism’ through one-to-one laptop investments in Swedish schools. IRPPS Monografie, pp. 75–84 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adalberon, E., Säljö, R.: Informal use of social media in higher education: a case study of Facebook groups. Nord. J. Digit. Lit. 12(4), 114–128 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2017-04-02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Francis, R.J.: The Decentring of the Traditional University: The Future of (Self) Education in Virtually Figured Worlds. Routledge, London (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanell, F.: Appropriating Facebook: enacting information literacies. Hum. IT 12(3), 5–35 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanell, F.: Information activities and appropriation in teacher trainees’ digital, group-based learning. Inf. Res. 21(1) (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanell, F.: Teacher trainees’ information sharing activities and identity positioning on Facebook. J. Doc. 73(2), 244–262 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanell, F.: Lärarstudenters digitala studievardag: informationslitteracitet vid en förskollärarutbildning. Diss. Lund: Lunds universitet (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kozinets, R.V.: Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage, Los Angeles (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kozinets, R.V.: Netnography: Redefined, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wertsch, J.V.: Mind as Action. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Limberg, L., Sundin, O., Talja, S.: Three theoretical perspectives on information literacy. Hum. IT 11(2), 93–130 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scribner, S., Cole, M.: The Psychology of Literacy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Penuel, W.R., Wertsch, J.V.: Vygotsky and identity formation: a sociocultural approach. Educ. Psychol. 30(2), 83–92 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3002_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erikson, E.H.: Childhood and Society, 2nd edn. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth (1965)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erikson, E.H.: Identity, Youth and Crisis. Norton, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gibson, E.J., Pick, A.D.: An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rivano Eckerdal, J.: Libraries, democracy, information literacy, and citizenship: an agonistic reading of central library and information studies’ concepts. J. Doc. 73(5), 1010–1033 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2016-0152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tellgren, B.: Från samhällsmoder till forskarbehörig lärare: kontinuitet och förändring i en lokal förskollärarutbildning. Diss. Örebro: Örebro universitet (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Francke, H., Sundin, O.: Negotiating the role of sources: educators’ conceptions of credibility in participatory media. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 34(3), 169–175 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Francke, H., Sundin, O., Limberg, L.: Debating credibility: the shaping of information literacies in upper secondary school. J. Doc. 67(4), 675–694 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111145043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sundin, O., Francke, H.: In search of credibility: pupils’ information practices in learning environments. Inf. Res. 14(4) (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hjøllund, N.-P.O.: Begærets subjekt og informationskompetence: en re-installering af subjektet. Diss. Copenhagen: Københavns Universitet (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Julien, H., Barker, S.: How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: a basis for information literacy skills development. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 31(1), 12–17 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Selwyn, N.: The digital native - myth and reality. Aslib Proc. 61(4), 364–379 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sormunen, E., Tanni, M., Alamettälä, T., Heinström, J.: Students’ group work strategies in source-based writing assignments. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(6), 1217–1231 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lloyd, A.: Informing practice: information experiences of ambulance officers in training and on-road practice. J. Doc. 65(3), 396–419 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910952401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sundin, O.: Nurses’ information seeking and use as participation in occupational communities. New Rev. Inf. Behav. Res.: Stud. Inf. Seeking Context 3, 187–202 (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meyers, E.M.: Tip of the iceberg: meaning, identity, and literacy in preteen virtual worlds. J. Educ. Libr. Inf. Sci. 50(4), 226–236 (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rivano Eckerdal, J.: Information, identitet, medborgarskap: unga kvinnor berättar om val av preventivmedel. Diss. Lund: Lunds universitet (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schreiber, T.: Conceptualizing students’ written assignments in the context of information literacy and Schatzki’s practice theory. J. Doc. 70(3), 346–363 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2013-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boyd, D.M.: It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press, New Haven (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pilerot, O.: Making design researchers’ information sharing visible through material objects. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(10), 2006–2016 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mansour, A., Francke, H.: Credibility assessments of everyday life information on Facebook: a sociocultural investigation of a group of mothers. Inf. Res. 22(2), 1–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Syn, S.Y., Oh, S.: Why do social network site users share information on Facebook and Twitter? J. Inf. Sci. 41(5), 553–569 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515585717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Manca, S., Ranieri, M.: Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 29(6), 487–504 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aaen, J., Dalsgaard, C.: Student “Facebook” groups as a third space: between social life and schoolwork. Learn. Media Technol. 41(1), 160–186 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bosch, T.E.: Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Commun. South Afr. J. Commun. Theory Res. 35(2), 185–200 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02500160903250648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mazer, J.P., Murphy, R.E., Simonds, C.J.: I’ll see you on “Facebook”: the effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Commun. Educ. 56(1), 1–17 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Greenhow, C., Lewin, C.: Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learn. Media Technol. 41(1), 6–30 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    O’Bannon, B.W., Beard, J.L., Britt, V.G.: Using a Facebook group as an educational tool: effects on student achievement. Comput. Sch. 30(3), 229–247 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.805972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Charteris, J., Parkes, M., Gregory, S., Fletcher, P., Reyes, V.: Student-initiated Facebook sites: nurturing personal learning environments or a place for the disenfranchised? Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 27(4), 459–472 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1507924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lu, Y., Curwood, J.S.: Update your status: exploring pre-service teacher identities in an online discussion group. Asia-Pac. J. Teach. Educ. 43(5), 438–449 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.960802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., Sammons, P.: The personal and professional selves of teachers: stable and unstable identities. Br. Edu. Res. J. 32(4), 601–616 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600775316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Davies, C.A.: Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. Routledge, London (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Spradley, J.P.: The Ethnographic Interview. Holt, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Willis, P., Trondman, M.: Manifesto for ethnography. Cult. Stud./Crit. Methodol. 2(3), 394–402 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1177/14661380022230679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Moll, L.C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., Gonzalez, N.: Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Pract. 31(2), 132–141 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Säljö, R.: Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26(1), 53–64 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Saunders, D.B.: Exploring a customer orientation: free-market logic and college students. Rev. High. Educ. 37(2), 197–219 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2014.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Selwyn, N.: Minding our language: why education and technology is full of bullshit … and what might be done about it. Learn. Media Technol. 41(3), 437–443 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linnaeus UniversityVäxjöSweden

Personalised recommendations