Advertisement

Challenges and Opportunities of ACM Digital Library: A Preliminary Survey on Different Users

  • Shaobo Liang
  • Daqing HeEmail author
  • Dan Wu
  • Haoge Hu
Conference paper
  • 188 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12051)

Abstract

As currently the ACM Digital Library (ACM DL) is developing its new version, this study aimed to understand the usages of ACM DL. Through focusing on the existing critical barriers for different DL users in their usages of the current ACM DL, this study aimed to identify important potential directions for the further developments of the new ACM DL. A survey was conducted among different countries, and 157 valid responses were collected. The results show information access barriers to the current ACM DL in the aspects of resource formats, browsing experience, and searching experience. We then proposed several design changes that can help developers of the ACM DL and other DLs to design more user-centered DL interfaces.

Keywords

Digital Library Information access Online survey 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is an outcome of project “User Seeking Behavior Modeling and Search Technology Development Within Multi-Device Integrated Search Environment” (No. 71673204) supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China.

References

  1. 1.
    Arms, W.: Digital Libraries. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Witten, I.H., Bainbridge, D., Nichols, D.M.: How to Build a Digital Library. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ACM Digital Library. https://dl.acm.org/. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
  4. 4.
    Next ACM Digital Library. https://dlnext.acm.org/. Accessed 19 Sept 2019
  5. 5.
    Marchionini, G., Plaisant, C., Komlodi, A.: Interfaces and tools for the Library of Congress national digital library program. Inf. Process. Manag. 34(5), 535–555 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dinet, J., Favart, M., Passerault, J.M.: Searching for information in an online public access catalogue (OPAC): the impacts of information search expertise on the use of Boolean operators. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 20(5), 338–346 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang, T., Wang, M., Gao, H.: A search log analysis of OPAC users’ searching behavior-a case study of Wuhan University library. Doc. Inf. Knowl. 167, 46–56 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Islamaj Dogan, R., Murray, G.C., Névéol, A., Lu, Z.: Understanding PubMed® user search behavior through log analysis. Database (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Toms, E.G., Dufour, C., Hesemeier, S.: Measuring the user’s experience with digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 51–52. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dongzhi, B.: Current situation and influence of the three network convergence. China New Telecommun. 4, 5–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franke, M., Geyer-Schulz, A., Neumann, A.: Building recommendations from random walks on library OPAC usage data. In: Zani, S., Cerioli, A., Riani, M., Vichi, M. (eds.) Data Analysis, Classification and the Forward Search. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, pp. 235–246. Springer, Heidelberg. (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35978-8_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willson, R., Given, L.M.: The effect of spelling and retrieval system familiarity on search behavior in online public access catalogs: a mixed methods study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61(12), 2461–2476 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hutchinson, H.B., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A.: The evolution of the international children’s digital library searching and browsing interface. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 105–112. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A Survey about ACM Digital Library Usage. https://www.wjx.cn/jq/39294761.aspx. Accessed 19 Sept 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations