Advertisement

How to Initiate a Discussion Thread?: Exploring Factors Influencing Engagement Level of Online Deliberation

  • Jieli LiuEmail author
  • Pengyi Zhang
Conference paper
  • 179 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12051)

Abstract

Online platforms provide a public sphere for discussion, debate, and deliberation among citizens. The engagement of online deliberation enables participants to exchange viewpoints and form communities. This paper aims to explore the influencing factors on engagement level of online deliberation by examining the relationship between an initial post’s content features and length and the engagement of the discussion thread it initiates. We sampled 254 discussion threads with 254 initial posts and 2934 following posts and conducted quantitative and qualitative analysis of the posts. Findings show that initial posts which are longer and allocentric (as opposed to egocentric) would evoke longer following posts in a discussion. Different content type (social interaction, claim, argument) of initial posts would lead to significant different engagement, arguments would trigger higher level engagement (average posts per participant and average length of posts in discussions). Whether an initial post holds a clear position has no significant impact on discussion engagement. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of online deliberation and its engagement and can be useful in promoting engagements in online deliberation.

Keywords

Online communities Online deliberation Initial post Engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by NSFC Grant #71603012.

References

  1. 1.
    Carpini, M.X.D., Cook, F.L., Jacobs, L.R.: Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical liter. Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 7, 315–344 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, J., Wang, Y.: Information worth spreading: an exploration of information sharing from social q&a to other social media platforms. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 53, 1–5 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cappella, J.N., Price, V., Nir, L.: Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: electronic dialogue during campaign 2000. Polit. Commun. 19, 73–93 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Price, V., Cappella, J.N.: Online deliberation and its influence: the electronic dialogue project in campaign 2000. IT Soc. 1, 303–329 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou, X., Chan, Y.-Y., Peng, Z.-M.: Deliberativeness of online political discussion: a content analysis of the Guangzhou daily website. J. Stud. 9, 759–770 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halpern, D., Gibbs, J.: Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 1159–1168 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Habermas, J., Habermas, J.: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Min, S.-J.: Online vs. face-to-face deliberation: effects on civic engagement. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12, 1369–1387 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xiao, L., Askin, N.: What influences online deliberation? A wikipedia study. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65, 898–910 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ke, F., Xie, K.: Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses. Internet High. Educ. 12, 136–145 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Medaglia, R., Yang, Y.: Online public deliberation in China: evolution of interaction patterns and network homophily in the Tianya discussion forum. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20, 733–753 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sherblom, J.C.: Organization involvement expressed through pronoun use in computer mediated communication. Commun. Res. Rep. 7, 45–50 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roeser, S.: Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions. Risk Anal.: Int. J. 32, 1033–1040 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ManagementPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations