Development of Digital Entrepreneurship and New Business Models as a Result of the Expansion of Information Systems

  • Slavica Mitrović Veljković
  • Jelena RautEmail author
  • Boban Melović
  • Đorđe Ćelić
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)


We have witnessed that the Internet has brought with it many consequences, through its development. Rapid changes in the business environment increase the pressure on businesses to adapt their business logic and processes to stay ahead of the market and their competitors. Certainly, one of the biggest consequences of the development of the Internet, as a globally accessible network, is digital entrepreneurship, with its new forms of business, or business models that have had an impact on all of humanity, especially in the last decade of the 21st century. Digital entrepreneurship is a phenomenon that occurs through technological means, such as the Internet and information and communication technology. As the phenomenon of digitalization causes different implications for rapid change, it is of utmost importance for entrepreneurs and their research as they need to be aware of new results, they need to know how to connect new results and identify new opportunities for their businesses. Digitization has created numerous opportunities for entrepreneurial activity, where entrepreneurs need to be aware of them in order to be prepared for sustainable innovations. Digitization has not been reduced to just one new development in entrepreneurship, as business models appear to be facing a major shift towards the entire digital environment. This paper aims to explain the phenomenon of digital entrepreneurship, as well as the development of new models, including all the influential factors that contribute to it.


Information and communication systems Digital entrepreneurship Business models Innovation Changes 


  1. 1.
    Hsieh, Y.J., Wu, J.Y.: Entrepreneurship through the platform strategy in the digital era: insights and research opportunities. Comput. Hum. Behav. 95(1), 315–323 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jenkins, H.: A “business opportunity” model of corporate social responsibility for small- and medium-sized enterprises. Bus. Ethics 18(1), 21–36 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richter, C., Kraus, S., Brem, A., Durst, S., Giselbrecht, C.: Digital entrepreneurship: innovative business models for the sharing economy. Creat. Innov. Manag. 26(3), 300–310 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Camagni, R., Capello, R.: Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: toward smart innovation policies. Growth Change 44(2), 355–389 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drucker, P.T.: Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Harper & Row, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bessant, J., Tidd, J.: Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trimi, S., Berbegal-Mirabent, J.: Business model innovation in entrepreneurship. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 8(4), 449–465 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H.: Open innovation: the next decade. Res. Policy 43(5), 805–811 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sussan, F., Acs, Z.J.: The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Bus. Econ. 49(1), 55–73 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arthur, B.W.: The Nature of Technology. Free Press, NewYork (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gartner, W.B.: What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? J. Bus. Venturing 5(1), 15–28 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McClelland, D.C.: Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs. J. Creative Behav. 21(3), 219–233 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hornaday, J., Aboud, J.: Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs. Pers. Psychol. 24(2), 141–153 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gans, J., Stern, S.: The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 32(2), 333–350 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kyprianou, A.: Deep factorization of the stable process. Electron. J. Probab. 21(23), 1–28 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srinivasan, A., Venkatraman, N.: Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: a network-centric view. Strateg. Entrep. J. 12(1), 54–71 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brem, A.: Digital technology entrepreneurship: a definition and research agenda. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 7(5), 44–51 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matlay, H., Westhead, P.: Innovation and collaboration in virtual teams of e-entrepreneurs: case evidence from the European tourism industry. Int. J. Enterpren. Innovat. 8(1), 29–36 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walker, H.: The virtual organization: a new organizational form? IJNVO 3(1), 25–41 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ignatiadis, I., Svirskas, A., Roberts, B., Tarabanis, K.: Promoring trust in B2B virtual organisations through business and technological infrastructures. IJNVO 3(4), 395–411 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Okkonen, J.: How virtuality affects knowledge work: points on performance and knowledge management. IJNVO 2(2), 153–161 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ladeira, M.J.M., Ferreira, F.A.F., Ferreira, J.J.M., Fang, W., Falcao, W.F., Rosa, A.A.: Exploring the determinants of digital entrepreneurship using fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 15(4), 1077–1101 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Muller-Lankenau, C., Wehmeyer, K., Klein, S.: Strategic channel alignment: an analysis of the configuration of physical and virtual marketing channels. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 4(2), 187–216 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dinh, T.L., Vu, M.C., Ayayi, A.: Towards a living lab for promoting the digital entrepreneurship. Int. J. Enterpren. 22(1), 29–38 (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKay, A., Kundu, S.: A representation scheme for digital product service system definitions. Adv. Eng. Inform. 28(4), 479–498 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zott, C., Amit, R., Massa, L.: The business model: recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 37(4), 1019–1042 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Magreta, J.: Why business models matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(5), 86–92 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Al-Debei, M.M., Avison, D.: Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19(3), 359–376 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C.: Clarifying business models: origins, present and future of the concept. CAIS 16(1), 1–28 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Teece, D.J.: Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plann. 43(2), 172–194 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Troxler, P., Wolf, P.: Digital maker-entrepreneurs in open design: what activities make up their business model? Bus. Horizons 60(6), 807–817 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ojala, A.: Business models and opportunity creation: how IT entrepreneurs create and develop business models under uncertainty. Inform. Syst. J. 26(5), 451–476 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Franke, N., Shah, S.: How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy 32(1), 157–178 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sawhney, M., Verona, G., Prandelli, E.: Collaborating to create: the Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. J. Interact. Mark. 19(4), 4–14 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Del Giudice, M., Straub, D.: Editors comments: IT and entrepreneurism: an on-again, off-again love affair or a marriage? MIS Q. 35(4), 3–9 (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ebel, P., Bretschneider, U., Leimeister, J.M.: Leveraging virtual business model innovation: a framework for designing business model development tools. Inform. Syst. J. 26(5), 519–550 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bouncken, R.B., Muench, M., Kraus, S.: Born globals: investigation the influence of their business models. IBER 14(2), 247–256 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Frederiksen, D.L., Brem, A.: How do entrepreneurs think they create value? A scientific reflection of Eric Ries Lean Startup approach. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 13(1), 169–189 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rasmussen, E.S., Tanev, S.: The Emergence of the lean global startup as a new type of firm. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 5(11), 12–19 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Giones, F., Pyayr, O.P.: How crowdsourcing and crowdfunding are redefining innovation management. In: Brem, A., Viardot, E. (eds.) Revolution of Innovation Management, pp. 43–70. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brem, A., Nylund, P.A., Schuster, G.: Innovation and de facto standardization: the influence of dominant desing on innovative performance, radical innovation, and process innovation. Technovation 50(51), 79–88 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kraus, S., Brem, A., Schuessler, M., Schuessler, F., Niemand, T.: Innovative born globals: investigating the influence of their business models on international performance. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 21(1), 1–54 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Richter, C., Kraus, S., Bouncken, R.: Virtual currencies like bitcoin as a paradigm shift in the field of transaction. IBER 14(4), 575–586 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stenholm, P., Acs, Z.J., Wuebker, R.: Exploring country level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. J. Bus. Venturing 28(1), 176–193 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Slavica Mitrović Veljković
    • 1
  • Jelena Raut
    • 1
    Email author
  • Boban Melović
    • 2
  • Đorđe Ćelić
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technical SciencesUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of MontenegroPodgoricaMontenegro

Personalised recommendations