Advertisement

Factors Affecting the Adoption of Technological Service Innovations

  • Duzenli OzgeEmail author
  • Felekoglu Burcu
  • Tasan Ali Serdar
Conference paper
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

The continuous and increasing speed of technology is directly affecting human behaviour. Human nature accepts some innovations and changes as they are, while others are resisting to accept them. It is not possible to use technology effectively in the retail area without knowing the impact of technological innovations on the customers and the perspectives of customers against such innovations. For this reason, it is of enormous importance for employees and customers to adopt this innovation to achieve success and ensure sustainability of the models related to technological service innovations. The objective of this study is considering the complex structure of the adoption process of the technological service innovation by employees and customers in detail. In this context, firstly a systematic literature review was conducted and then the factors affecting the adoption of technological service innovation were identified. The extended form of The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT 2), by integrating personal innovativeness (PI) factor, was developed for a technological service innovation.

Keywords

Retailing Service innovation Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) 

References

  1. 1.
    Toivonen, M., Tuominen, T.: Emergence of innovations in services. Serv. Ind. J. 29(7), 887–902 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Snyder, H., Witell, L., Gustafsson, A., Kristensson, P.: Identifying categories of service innovation: a review and synthesis of the literature. J. Bus. Res. 69(7), 2401–2408 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sabuncu, B.: A Study on the innovation in SMEs and the identification of the obstacles: the case of Denizli. İşletme Araşt. Derg. 6(1), 103–123 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inman, J., Nikolava, H.: Shopper-facing retail technology: a retailer adoption decision framework incorporating shopper attitudes and privacy concerns. J. Retail. 9(1), 7–28 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simon, B.: Wissensmedien im Bildungssektor. Eine Akzeptanzuntersuchung an Hochschulen. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business Wien, Austria (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turnbull, P., Meenaghan, A.: Diffusion and innovation and opinion leadership. Eur. J. Mark. 14(1), 3–33 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kraljic, A., Pestek, A.: An application of UTAUT2 model in exploring the impact of quality of technology on mobile Internet. J. Econ. Bus. 14(2), 66–76 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taherdoost, H.: A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manuf. 22(1), 960–967 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Boston (1975)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1002 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.: A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 27(3), 451–481 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(14), 1111–1132 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vallerand, R.J.: Toward a Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor, S., Todd, P.: Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behaviour: a study of consumer adoption intentions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 12(20), 137–155 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor, S., Todd, P.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(2), 144–176 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., Howell, J.M.: Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 15(1), 124–143 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Triandis, H.: Interpersonal Behaviour. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Monterey (1977)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moore, G., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 192–222 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Compeau, D., Higgins, C.: Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 19(2), 189–211 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bandura, A.: Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Worth Publishers, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ariwiati, Indrawati, I.: Factors affecting e-commerce adoption by micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in Indonesia. In: Macedo, M., Gauzente, C., Peng, G.C., Nunes, M.B. (eds.) Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Information Systems Post-Implementation and Change Management, pp. 118–125. IADIS, Spain (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pantano, E., Rese, A., Baier, D.: Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: a two country comparison of youth markets. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 38(C), 81–95 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wünderlich, N., Heinonen, K., Ostrom, A., Patrício, L.: “Futurizing” smart service: implications for service researchers and managers. J. Serv. Mark. 29(6/7), 442–447 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Darsono, L.: Examining information technology acceptance by individual professionals. Gadjah Mada Int. J. Bus. 7(2), 155–178 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Graduate School of Natural and Applied SciencesDokuz Eylül UniversityIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringDokuz Eylül UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations