Advertisement

The Thing About the Internet of Things: Scoping the Social Science Discourse in IoT Research

  • Viktor MählerEmail author
Conference paper
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 574)

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is predicted to change not only industry, businesses and commerce, but also our everyday lives. Social science research surrounding IoT is important and necessary because of this predicted change. In this ‘scoping study’ keyword-clusters are being used to identify key-concepts within the social science subject area, giving an overview of the scopes within said concepts, and where social science stands to benefit from further research. The result is the thematization of 25 keywords, spread within 5 clusters; Organization, Logistics, Infrastructure, Technology and Protection. This paper argues that more research is needed in human-centric aspects, and that in doing this - a potential sixth theme regarding ethics can emerge where the subject field of social science can stand to generate a larger impact on IoT research.

Keywords

Internet of Things Scoping study Themes Social science Ethics 

References

  1. Anthopoulos, L., Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V.: A Unified Smart City Model (USCM) for smart city conceptualization and benchmarking. In: Smart Cities and Smart Spaces: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, pp. 247–264. IGI Global (2019)Google Scholar
  2. Arksey, H., O’Malley, L.: Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8(1), 19–32 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botta-Genoulaz, V., Millet, P.A.: An investigation into the use of ERP systems in the service sector. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 99(1–2), 202–221 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University: “VOSviewer - Visualizing scientific landscapes”. VOSviewer (2018). http://www.vosviewer.com/. Accessed 10 June 2019
  5. Dijkman, R.M., Sprenkels, B., Peeters, T., Janssen, A.: Business models for the Internet of Things. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35(6), 672–678 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elsevier: The largest database of peer-reviewed literature – Scopus—Elsevier Solutions (2019). https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus. Accessed 20 June 2019
  7. Ericsson: Cellular Networks for Massive IoT, Enabling Low Power Wide Area Applications. Ericsson White Paper (Uen 284 23-3278), January 2016. https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/publications/white-papers/wp_iot.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2019
  8. Gallivan, M.J., Spitler, V.K., Koufaris, M.: Does information technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers’ influence on IT usage in the workplace. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 153–192 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., Koo, C.: Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electron. Mark. 25(3), 179–188 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A.L., Nordfält, J.: The future of retailing. J. Retail. 93(1), 1–6 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris, I., Wang, Y., Wang, H.: ICT in multimodal transport and technological trends: unleashing potential for the future. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159, 88–103 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hashem, I.A.T., et al.: The role of big data in smart city. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36(5), 748–758 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutton, W.H.: Putting things to work: social and policy challenges for the Internet of Things. Info 16(3), 1–21 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin, X., Wah, B.W., Cheng, X., Wang, Y.: Significance and challenges of big data research. Big Data Res. 2(2), 59–64 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang, H.S., et al.: Smart manufacturing: past research, present findings, and future directions. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 3(1), 111–128 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-016-0015-5MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Arnold, C., Voigt, K.I.: Sustainable industrial value creation: benefits and challenges of Industry 4.0. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 21(08), 1740015 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kusiak, A.: Smart manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56(1–2), 508–517 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, S., Tryfonas, T., Li, H.: The Internet of Things: a security point of view. Internet Res. 26(2), 337–359 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2014-0173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, I., Lee, K.: The Internet of Things (IoT): applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Bus. Horiz. 58(4), 431–440 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lilis, G., Conus, G., Asadi, N., Kayal, M.: Towards the next generation of intelligent building: an assessment study of current automation and future IoT based systems with a proposal for transitional design. Sustain. Cities Soc. 28, 473–481 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neisse, R., Steri, G., Fovino, I.N., Baldini, G.: SecKit: a model-based security toolkit for the Internet of Things. Comput. Secur. 54, 60–76 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ng, I.C., Wakenshaw, S.Y.: The Internet-of-Things: review and research directions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 34(1), 3–21 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peppet, S.R.: Regulating the Internet of Things: first steps toward managing discrimination, privacy, security and consent. Tex. L. Rev. 93, 85 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. Porter, M.E., Heppelmann, J.E.: How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harv. Bus. Rev. 92(11), 64–88 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. Reaidy, P.J., Gunasekaran, A., Spalanzani, A.: Bottom-up approach based on Internet of Things for order fulfillment in a collaborative warehousing environment. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159, 29–40 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roblek, V., Meško, M., Krapež, A.: A complex view of Industry 4.0. Sage Open 6(2), 2158244016653987 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salim, F., Haque, U.: Urban computing in the wild: a survey on large scale participation and citizen engagement with ubiquitous computing, cyber physical systems, and Internet of Things. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 81, 31–48 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Senn, J.: The challenge of relating IS research to practice. Inf. Resour. Manag. J. (IRMJ) 11(1), 23–28 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shin, D.H.: Conceptualizing and measuring quality of experience of the Internet of Things: exploring how quality is perceived by users. Inf. Manag. 54(8), 998–1011 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Internet of Things Statista: Number of connected devices worldwide 2012–2025 (2019). https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/. Accessed 30 June 2019
  31. Tarschys, D., Lachapelle, G.: 2010 Social scientists in the corridors of power. In: ISSC, IDS and UNESCO, World Social Science Report 2010, Knowledge Divides, chap. 8. UNESCO Publishing, Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  32. Trappe, W., Howard, R., Moore, R.S.: Low-energy security: Limits and opportunities in the Internet of Things. IEEE Secur. Priv. 13(1), 14–21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weinberg, B.D., Milne, G.R., Andonova, Y.G., Hajjat, F.M.: Internet of Things: convenience vs. privacy and secrecy. Bus. Horiz. 58(6), 615–624 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wittrock, B.: Shifting involvements: rethinking the social, the human and the natural. In: ISSC, IDS and UNESCO, World Social Science Report 2010, Knowledge Divides, chap. 6. UNESCO Publishing, Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  35. Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., Li, L.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56(8), 294 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations