Advertisement

Framework for Project Management in Agile Projects: A Quantitative Study

  • Gloria J. MillerEmail author
Conference paper
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 380)

Abstract

Recent studies have confirmed the efficacy of agile methodologies in project success, but can projects skip several project management tasks and still deliver the expected results? How are traditional project managers engaged in agile projects? Who executes what project management tasks in projects applying agile methodologies? The aim of this study was to define a framework for project management tasks in agile projects. The results quantify subjective and theoretical speculation on who performs the project management tasks in agile projects. Project managers are engaged in agile projects, and the team, the product owner, and the project sponsor are significantly involved in project management tasks. The agile coach is not a substitute for the project manager. This study identifies areas where agile methodologies should be updated to clarify team responsibilities for project management activities.

Keywords

Project management Agile Scrum ISO Product owner Agile coach Scrum master Project manager 

References

  1. 1.
    Serrador, P., Pinto, J.K.: Does agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(5), 1040–1051 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noll, J., Razzak, M.A., Bass, J.M., Beecham, S.: A study of the scrum master’s role. In: Felderer, M., Méndez Fernández, D., Turhan, B., Kalinowski, M., Sarro, F., Winkler, D. (eds.) PROFES 2017. LNCS, vol. 10611, pp. 307–323. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor, K.J.: Adopting Agile software development: the project manager experience. Inf. Technol. Peopl. 29(4), 670–687 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2014-0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hobbs, B., Petit, Y.: Agile methods on large projects in large organizations. Proj. Manag. J. 48(3), 3–19 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J.: The Scrum Guide: The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shastri, Y., Hoda, R., Amor, R.: Does the “Project Manager” still exist in agile software development projects? In: 2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), pp. 57–64, Hamilton, New Zealand (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.019
  7. 7.
    PMI: Agile Practice Guide. Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mansor, Z., Arshad, N.H., Yahya, S., Razali, R.: The competency of project managers in managing agile cost management. Adv. Sci. Lett. 22(8), 1930–1934 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.7750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conboy, K., Morgan, L.: Combining open innovation and agile approaches: implications for IS project managers, In: ECIS 2010 Proceedings 21 (2010). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2010/21. Accessed 1 Dec 2018
  10. 10.
    Sutling, K., Mansor, Z., Widyarto, S., Letchmunan, S., Arshad, N.H.: Agile project manager behavior: the taxonomy. In: 2014 8th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC), pp. 234–239. IEEE, Langkawi, Malaysia (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MySec.2014.6986020
  11. 11.
    Sutling, K., Mansor, Z., Widyarto, S., Lecthmunan, S., Arshad, N.H.: Understanding of project manager competency in agile software development project: the taxonomy. In: Kim, K.(ed.) Information Science and Applications. LNEE, vol. 339, pp. 859–868. Springer, Heidelberg (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46578-3_102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoda, R., Murugesan, L.K.: Multi-level agile project management challenges: a self-organizing team perspective. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 245–257 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sverrisdottir, H.S., Ingason, H.T., Jonasson, H.I.: The role of the product owner in scrum-comparison between theory and practices. Procedia Soc. Behav. 119, 257–267 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mayfield, K.M.: Project Managers’ Experience and Description of Decision Uncertainty Associated with the Agile Software Development Methodology: a Phenomenological Study, vol. 3427057, p. 106. Capella University, Ann Arbor (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sheffield, J., Lemétayer, J.: Factors associated with the software development agility of successful projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 31(3), 459–472 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turner, J.R.: Towards a theory of project management: the nature of the project. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24(1), 1–3 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turner, J.R.: Towards a theory of project management: the nature of the project governance and project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24(2), 93–95 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lundin, R.A., Söderholm, A.: A theory of temporary organization. Scand. J. Manag. 11(4), 437–455 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-UCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ISO: ISO 21500: 2012 Guidance on project management. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    APM: APM Body of Knowledge 6th Edition. Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    PMI: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joslin, R., Müller, R.: Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(6), 1377–1392 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beck, K., et al.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://agilemanifesto.org/
  24. 24.
    Binder, J., Aillaud, L.I.V., Schilli, L.: The project management cocktail model: an approach for balancing Agile and ISO 21500. Procd. Soc. Behv. 119, 182–191 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zwikael, O., Meredith, J.R.: Who’s who in the project zoo? The ten core project roles. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 38(2), 474–492 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2017-0274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bonner, N.A.: Predicting leadership success in agile environments: an inquiring systems approach. Acad. Inf. Manag. Sci. J. 13(2), 83–103 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang, H., Huff, S., Strode, D.: Leadership in software development: comparing perceptions of agile and traditional project managers. In: Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2009, 6–9 August 2009, pp. 184–196, San Francisco, California, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shastri, Y., Hoda, R., Amor, R.: Understanding the roles of the manager in Agile project management. In: 10th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference, pp. 45–55, Jaipur, India (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3021460.3021465
  29. 29.
    Hayden, C., Molenkamp, R.J.: Tavistock Primer II. AK Rice Institute for Study of Social Systems, Jupiter (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Green, Z.: Boundary, Authority, Role and Task (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    PMI: PMI Fact File. PMI Today, pp. 4. Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States (2019)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stuart, E.A.: Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat. Sci. 25(1), 1–21 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Parsons, L.S.: Using SAS® Software to Perform a Case-Control Match on Propensity Score in an Observational Study. SUGI 29. SAS Institute, Inc., Le Palais des congrès de Montréal Québec, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Field, A.: Discovering Statistics: Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tavares, B., Silva, C., Dinizde Souza, A.: Practices to improve risk management in agile projects. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Know. 29(03), 381–399 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194019500165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.maxmetricsHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations