Advertisement

Using Heuristics for Assessing the Usability of the Public Information Bulletins in Poland

  • Łukasz KrawiecEmail author
  • Helena Dudycz
Conference paper
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 380)

Abstract

Increasing attention is being paid to the usability of public administration websites. Websites of this kind should offer appropriate functionality as well as being accessible to their users. This, among other things, is due to the many regulations introduced by countries’ governments. The aim of this paper is to present the most common usability errors identified on the websites of public administration units and the preliminary results of the assessment of the usability of Polish twenty largest cities’ Public Information Bulletin websites with the use of the heuristic evaluation. The study was conducted according to the heuristics method proposed by J. Nielsen. The main groups of errors affecting the usability of such websites were identified. Each of the error groups was assessed by an expert in terms of its importance for the overall assessment of the website’s usefulness. On this basis, the categories were assigned ranks from 1 to 5. This enabled indicating errors on the websites under study, as well as performing a comparison of the websites of the Public Information Bulletin of selected cities. The contribution of the article consists in the proposal of fourteen categories of heuristics for testing the usability and accessibility of public administration websites. The article presents a survey of public administration websites (on the example of the Public Information Bulletin in Poland) using the proposed heuristics.

Keywords

Web usability Web accessibility Web usability study Heuristic evaluation Human-Computer interaction Public administration unit 

References

  1. 1.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: Introduction to Usability (2012). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
  2. 2.
    Introduction to Web Accessibility – Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) – W3C. https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro. Accessed 14 Dec 2019
  3. 3.
    Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion – Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) – W3C. https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion. Accessed 14 Dec 2019
  4. 4.
    Streich, S.: Accessibility is NOT just for people with disabilities (2019). https://vimm.com/website-accessibility. Accessed 1 May 2019
  5. 5.
    Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April (1997). http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19970780483. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
  6. 6.
    Act on Access to Public Information (2001). http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20011121198&type=3. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
  7. 7.
    Searchmetrics, Website Definition (2019). https://www.searchmetrics.com/glossary/website. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
  8. 8.
    Gąsiorkiewicz, A.: Main factors for web traffic level in B2C E-commerce websites and their impact on conversion ratio. In: Łongiewska-Wijas, E. (ed.) E-gospodarka w Polsce Stan obecny i perspektywy rozwoju, vol. 597, pp. 637–645. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waddell, C., et al.: Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Apress Publishing House, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khalid, H., Hedge, A., Ahram, T.: Advances in Ergonomics Modeling and Usability Evaluation. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO 9241-210:2019(en) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2019). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-2:v1:en. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
  12. 12.
    ISO/IEC 25010:2011(en) Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models (2011). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:25010:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
  13. 13.
    Quiñones, D., Rusu, C.: How to develop usability heuristics: a systematic literature review. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 53, 89–122 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Rusu, V., Collazos, C.A.: Developing SMASH: a set of smartphone’s usability heuristics. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 43, 40–52 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability evaluation methods for the web: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(8), 789–817 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paz, F., Pow-Sang, J.A.: A systematic mapping review of usability evaluation methods for software development process. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 10(1), 165–178 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Philips, M.: Elevate Your UX with a Heuristic Analysis – How to Run a Usability Evaluation (2017). https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/elevate-your-ux-heuristic-analysis-how-run-miklos-philips. Accessed 15 Sept 2018
  20. 20.
    Gerhardt-Powals, J.: Cognitive engineering principles for enhancing human-computer performance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 8(2), 189–211 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weinschenk, S., Barker, D.T.: Designing Effective Speech Interfaces. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shneiderman, B.: The Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design. Designing the User Interface, 6th edn. Pearson, London (2006). Section 3.3.4Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Jimenez, C., Rusu, V.: Usability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices. IEEE Xplore (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2012.134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tognazzini, B.: First Principles of Interaction Design (Revised & Expanded). askTog (2014). https://asktog.com/atc/principles-of-interaction-design. Accessed 9 May 2019
  25. 25.
    Douglas, S.: 7 Usability Heuristics That All UI Designers Should Know. Usability Geek (2017). https://usabilitygeek.com/usability-heuristics-ui-designers-know. Accessed 19 Jan 2019
  26. 26.
    Jimenez, C., Lozada, P., Rosas, P.: Usability heuristics: a systematic review. In: 11th Colombian Computing Conference, Popayan, Colombia, 27–30 September 2016 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ColumbianCC.2016.7750805
  27. 27.
    Dourado, M.A.D., Canedo E.D.: Usability heuristics for mobile applications – a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS’ 2018), vol. 2, pp. 483–494 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.5220/0006781404830494
  28. 28.
    Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. – 29 U.S.C. § 798. Section 508 – Electronic and Information Technology. https://www.fcc.gov/general/section-508-rehabilitation-act. Accessed 20 Feb 2019
  29. 29.
    Barrierefreie Informationstechnik-Verordnung – BITV 2.0. https://www.barrierefreies-webdesign.de/bitv/bitv-2.0.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2019
  30. 30.
    Accessibilità siti web. AgID promuove l’accessibilità dei siti web in relazione alla normativa vigente. https://www.agid.gov.it/it/design-servizi/accessibilita-siti-web. Accessed 20 Feb 2019
  31. 31.
    Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 12 April 2012, on the National Interoperability Framework. http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20120000526. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
  32. 32.
    Information for PIB editors. https://www.bip.gov.pl/articles/view/43. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Krawiec, Ł., Dudycz, H.: Identification of heuristics for assessing the usability of websites of public administration units. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2019 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Leipzig, 1–4 September 2019, pp. 651–657 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.15439/2019F307

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wroclaw University of Economics and BusinessWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations