Advertisement

Data Collection and Analysis

  • Md Nazrul Islam
  • Md Saidul IslamEmail author
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter elaborates upon the methods used to collect and analyze data for this study. The primary sources of data gathered and used in the research include face-to-face intensive interviews with different categories of informed people—politicians, journalists, human rights activists, Islamic scholars, Islamic party leaders, and academics—and focus group discussion. Along with the primary data, secondary data, especially from books, journal articles, newspapers, periodicals, and occasional papers have also been obtained and analyzed for this study. Together, these sources work to offer an exhaustive and authentic illustration of religion and politics, particularly Islam and democracy in Bangladesh. To present a comprehensive understanding of the methodology used in this research, we have divided this chapter into several sections, such as triangulation of methods, sampling, data collection and analysis, and research obstacles.

Keywords

Bangladesh Triangulation of methods Sampling Data collection Human rights activists Journalists Islamic scholars Political leaders Focus group discussion 

References

  1. Bachiochi, Peter D., and Sara P. Weiner. 2002. “Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by Steven G. Rogelberg, 161–183. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, Michael. 1985. “Intensive Interviewing.” In The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches, edited by Michael Brenner, Jennifer Brown, and David Canter, 147–162. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bucholtz, Mary. 2000. “The Politics of Transcription.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1439–1465.Google Scholar
  4. Burgess, Robert G. 1982. “Elements of Sampling in Field Research.” In Field Research: A Source Book and Field Manual, edited by Robert G. Burgess, 114–120. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, Deborah. 2001. Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Denzin, Norman K. 2009. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Method. New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  7. DeWalt, Kathleen M., and Billie R. DeWalt. 2011. Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  8. Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fontana, Andrea, and James. H. Frey. 1994. “Interviewing, the Art of Science.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 361–376. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Foster, Peter. 2006. “Observational Research.” In Data Collection and Analysis, edited by Roger Sapsford and Victor Jupp, 57–92. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Frey, James H., and Andrea Fontana. 1991. “The Group Interview in Social Research.” The Social Science Journal 28 (2): 175–187.Google Scholar
  12. Gilb, Corinne L. 1957. “Tape-Recorded Interviewing: Some Thoughts from California.” American Archivist 20 (4): 335–344.Google Scholar
  13. Harre, Rom, and Paul. F. Secord. 1972. The Explanation of Social Behavior. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Kelly, George A. 1955. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Kitzinger, Jenny, and Rosaline S. Barbour. 1999. “Introduction: The Challenge and Promise of Focus Groups.” In Developing Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, edited by Rosaline S. Barbour and Jenny Kitzinger, 1–20. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Lapadat, Judith C., and Anne C. Lindsay. 1999. “Transcription in Research and Practice: From Standardization of Technique to Interpretive Positionings.” Qualitative Inquiry 5 (1): 64–86.Google Scholar
  17. Legard, Robin, Jill Keegan, and Kit Ward. 2003. “In-Depth Interviews.” In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, edited by Jane Ritchie and Jane Lewis, 138–169. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Lofland, John, and Lyn H. Lofland. 1995. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  19. MacLean, Lynne M., Mechthild Meyer, and Alma Estable. 2004. “Improving Accuracy of Transcripts in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 14 (1): 113–123.Google Scholar
  20. Maxwell, Joseph A. 2009. “Designing a Qualitative Study.” In Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, edited by Leonard Bickman and Debra J. Rog, 214–235. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Mishler, Elliot G. 1984. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  22. Mishler, Elliot G. 1986. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Morgan, David L., and Margaret T. Spanish. 1984. “Focus Group: A New Tool for Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Sociology 7 (3): 253–270.Google Scholar
  24. Ochs, Elinor. 1979. “Transcription as Theory.” In Developmental Pragmatics, edited by Elinor Ochs and Bambi Schieffelin, 43–72. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Oliver, Daniel G., Julianne M. Serovich, and Tina L. Mason. 2005. “Constraints and Opportunities with Interview Transcription: Towards Reflection in Qualitative Research.” Social Forces 84 (2): 1273–1289.Google Scholar
  26. Olsen, Wendy K. 2004. “Triangulation in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed.” In Developments in Sociology, edited by M. Holborn and M. Haralambos, 103–118. Ormskirk, Lancashire: Causeway Press.Google Scholar
  27. Poland, Blake D. 2002. “Transcription Quality.” In Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method, edited by Jaber Gubrium and James Holstein, 629–650. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Qu, Sandy Q., and John Dumay. 2011. “The Qualitative Research Interview.” Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management 8 (3): 238–264.Google Scholar
  29. Rubin, J. Herbert, and Irene S. Rubin. 2012. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Sandelowski, Margarete. 1994. “Focus on Qualitative Method: Notes on Transcription.” Research in Nursing and Health 17 (4): 311–314.Google Scholar
  31. Seidman, Irving. 2013. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  32. Spradley, James P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  33. Teddlie, Charles, and Fen Yu. 2007. “Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology with Examples.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 77–100.Google Scholar
  34. Tilley, Susan A. 1998. “Conducting Respectful Research: A Critique of Practice.” Canadian Journal of Education 23 (3): 316–328.Google Scholar
  35. Wilkinson, Sue. 1997. “Focus Group Research.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by David Silverman, 177–199. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political StudiesShahjalal University of Science and TechnologySylhetBangladesh
  2. 2.Division of SociologyNanyang Technological UniversityJurongSingapore

Personalised recommendations