Advertisement

Trends of Building Information Modeling Adoption in the Turkish AEC Industry

  • Ozan Onder OzenerEmail author
  • Ecem Tezel
  • Zehra Aybike Kilic
  • Merve Akdogan
Conference paper
  • 50 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1188)

Abstract

This paper presents the results from a comprehensive field study on BIM adoption and AEC integration targeting the Turkish AEC firms. The research objectives were to develop well-reasoned arguments supporting the role of BIM in the transformation of current business models in the Turkish AEC Industry as well as identifying the inclinations, challenges, and obstacles to BIM adoption. With in-depth interviews with industry representatives, the study returned valuable information that lead to context-dependent insights about the local AEC industry and influence of BIM adoption on all AEC operations. The findings from the study suggest that the existence of a rapidly growing interest in BIM-enabled processes and services due to local and global market dynamics and pressure. The influence of established business culture within the industry drastically affect perceptions towards the value propositions of BIM and IPD which are broadly known among the Turkish AEC firms which are different from the US and European counterparts. Results from this study motivate new discussions about BIM adoption and IPD from the perspective of the Turkish AEC Industry, and also provide arguments about the potential impacts of BIM deployment for the local and global construction projects which are undertaken by the Turkish AEC firms.

Keywords

Building Information Modeling (BIM) adoption Architectural Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry Turkish AEC industry 

References

  1. 1.
    Gu, N., London, K.: Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Autom. Constr. 19(8), 988–999 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clayton, M.J., Johnson, R.E., Vanegas, J., Ozener, O.O., Nome, C.A., Culp, C.E.: Downstream of design: Lifespan costs and benefits of building information modeling. Technical report, CRS Center for Leadership and Management in the Design and Construction Industry, Texas A&M University, College Station (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, D.K., Tardif, M.: Building Information Modeling: A Strategic Implementation Guide for Architects, Engineers, Constructors and Real Estate Asset Managers. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor, J., Bernstein, P.: Paradigm trajectories of building information modeling practice in project networks. J. Manag. Eng. 25(2), 69–76 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Howard, R., Bjork, B.: Building information modelling – experts’ views on standardization and industry deployment. Adv. Eng. Inf. 22(2), 271–280 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McGraw-Hill Construction: The Top 225 International Contractors & The Top 225 Global Contractors 2011, McGraw-Hill Construction, ENR (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    INTES Construction Sector Report 2018. https://intes.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/SEKTÖR-RAPORU.pdf. Accessed 07 Mar 2019
  8. 8.
    Ghaffarianhoseini, A., et al.: Building information modelling (BIM) uptake: clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 75, 1046–1053 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou, Y., Ding, L., Rao, Y., Luo, H., Medjdoub, B., Zhong, H.: Formulating project-level building information modeling evaluation framework from the perspectives of organizations: a review. Autom. Constr. 81, 44–55 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., Volm, J.M.: The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). Int. J. Proj. Manag. 31, 971–980 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Love, P.E.D., Simpson, I., Hill, A., Standing, C.: From justification to evaluation: building information modeling for asset owners. Autom. Constr. 35, 208–216 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Azhar, S.: Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC Industry. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 11(3), 241–252 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suermann, P.C., Issa, R.R.A.: Evaluating industry perceptions of building information modeling (BIM) impact on construction. ITcon J. Inf. Technol. Constr. (ITcon) 14, 574–594 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao, X., Wu, P., Wang, X.: Risk paths in BIM adoption: empirical study of China. Eng. Constr. Architectural Manag. 25(9), 1170–1187 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindblad, H.: Black boxing BIM: the public client’s strategy in BIM implementation. Constr. Manag. Econ. 37(1), 1–12 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hosseini, M.R., et al.: BIM adoption within Australian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): an innovation diffusion model. Constr. Econ. Build. 16(3), 71–86 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, S., Yu, J.: Comparative study of BIM acceptance between Korea and the United States. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 142(3), 05015016 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eadie, R., Browne, M., Odeyinka, H., Mckeown, C., Mcniff, S.: A survey of current status of and perceived changes required for BIM adoption in the UK. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 5(1), 4–21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aladag, H., Demirdögen, G., Isik, Z.: Building information modeling (BIM) use in Turkish construction industry. Proc. Eng. 161, 174–179 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Isikdag, U., Underwood, J., Kuruoglu, M., Goulding, J., Acikalin, U.: Construction informatics in Turkey: strategic role of ICT and future research directions. Inf. Technol. Constr. 14, 412–428 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ozorhon, B., Karahan, U.: Critical success factors of building information modeling implementation. J. Manag. Eng. 33(3), 1–10 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pekericli, M.K., Sari, R., Tanyer, A.M.: An investigation of building information modeling maturity in Turkish architecture and engineering firms. In: Gonenc Sorguc, A., Ozgenel, C.F., Krusa Yemiscioglu, M. (eds.) 11th Computational Design in Architecture National Symposium, MSTAS2017, pp. 214–227. METU Faculty of Architecture, Ankara (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ozener, O.O., Temiz, G.: Mimarlık ve inşaat sektöründe YBM odaklı dönüşüm [BIM-oriented architecture and construction industry]. Ege Mimarlık 93(2), 34–37 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ozan Onder Ozener
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ecem Tezel
    • 1
  • Zehra Aybike Kilic
    • 1
  • Merve Akdogan
    • 1
  1. 1.Istanbul Technical UniversitySisli IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations