Advertisement

Technical Feasibility for the Mobile Measurement of Noise Pollution by Remotely Piloted Aircraft System

  • Luis Carlos Rodríguez Timaná
  • Diego Fernando Saavedra Lozano
  • María Fernanda Díaz Velásquez
  • Javier Ferney Castillo GarcíaEmail author
Conference paper
  • 19 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1195)

Abstract

Excessive noise causes gradual hearing loss and interferes with sleep, reading and concentration. It can even cause physiological disturbances in the cardiovascular system. Noise quantification is usually performed using multiple static measurements with sound level meters. This article implements the technical feasibility analysis to perform mobile noise measurements using a Remotely Piloted Aircraft System-Drone. Initially the acoustic power emitted by a Drone Matrice 100 was estimated, for which a parallelepiped is defined taking as indications the ISO3744 standard and by means of an audio capture system. For the measurement a semi-anechoic chamber was established in a football field and the measurements were made in the early hours of the morning. The acoustic power of this type of drone was 84.6 dB, which determined that the signal-to-noise ratio had a very high value. An intervention in the design of the drone propellants is suggested to reduce the noise of the drones, so that previously the technical viability for applications of measurement of acoustic pollution is discarded.

Keywords

Acoustic pollution Drone Noise 

References

  1. 1.
    Klapel, J.: Acoustic measurements with a quadcopter: embedded system implementations for recording audio from above. Ph.D. thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hitage and the A ts Environment Division Department of Environment, Parks, Noise Measurement Procedures Manual, 2nd July 2008Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bermudez, M.: Contaminación y Turísmo Sostenible (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elsom, D.: La contaminación atmosférica. Ediciones Cátedra SA (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martínez Llorente, J., Peters, J.: Contaminación acústica y ruido. Ecol. en Acción, vol. 6 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berglund, B., Lindvall, T., Schwela, D.H., World Health Organization, Occupational and Environmental Health Team: Guidelines for community noise. World Health Organization, p. This document is the outcome of the WHO-expert task force meeting held in London, United Kingdom, in April 1999. It bases on the document entitled “Community noise” that was prepared for the World Health Organization and published in 1995 by the Stockholm University and Karolinska Institute (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raspberry. raspberrypi.org
  8. 8.
    DJI, Manual de Usuario: Drone Matrice 100 (2004). https://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/m100/M100_User_Manual_EN.pdf
  9. 9.
    Behringer: Measurement Condenser Microphone ECM8000 Technical Specifications (2013). https://media63.music-group.com/media/sys_master/h47/hde/8849927929886.pdf
  10. 10.
    Behringer: Quick Start Guide: U-PHORIA (2017). https://www.bhphotovideo.com/lit_files/374154.pdf
  11. 11.
    ISO: ISO 3744 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McLoughlin, I.V.: Basic audio processing. In: Speech and Audio Processing: A MATLAB®-based Approach, pp. 9–53. Cambridge University Press (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316084205.004
  13. 13.
    López García, R.G.: Caracterización y optimización de un sistema de sonido profesional (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grupo de Investigación en Electrónica Industrial y Ambiental – GIEIAMUniversidad Santiago de CaliCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations