Advertisement

Self-Sovereign Identity Systems

Evaluation Framework
  • Abylay SatybaldyEmail author
  • Mariusz NowostawskiEmail author
  • Jørgen Ellingsen
Chapter
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 576)

Abstract

Digital identity systems have been around for almost as long as computers and have evolved with the increased usage of online services. Digital identities have traditionally been used as a way of authenticating to the computer systems at work, or a personal online service, such as an email. Today, our physical existence has a digital counterpart that became an integral part of everyday life. Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) is the next step in the evolution of the digital identity management systems. The blockchain technology and distributed ledgers have provided necessary building blocks and facilities, that bring us closer to the realisation of an ideal Self-Sovereign Identity. But what exactly is an ideal Self-Sovereign Identity? What are the characteristics? Trade-offs? Here, we propose the framework and methodology that can be used to evaluate, describe, and compare SSI systems. Based on our comparison criteria and the evaluation framework, we present a systematic analytical study of existing SSI systems: uPort, Sovrin, ShoCard, Civic, and Blockstack.

Keywords

Identity management systems Digital signatures Peer-to-peer computing Cryptographic protocols Computer security 

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, A.: Self-sovereign identity. https://www.egiz.gv.at/files/download/Self-Sovereign-Identity-Whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  2. 2.
    Ali, M., Nelson, J., Shea, R., Freedman, M.J.: Blockstack: a global naming and storage system secured by blockchains. In: 2016 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 2016), pp. 181–194 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ali, M., Shea, R., Nelson, J., Freedman, M.J.: Blockstack: a new internet for decentralized applications. Technical whitepaper version 1 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen, C.: The path to self-sovereign identity (2016). http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2016/04/the-path-to-self-soverereign-identity.html
  5. 5.
    Blockstack: A decentralized storage architecture. https://docs.blockstack.org/storage/overview.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2019
  6. 6.
    Blockstack: Blockstack technical whitepaper v 2.0, May 2019. https://blockstack.org/whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2019
  7. 7.
    Cadwalladr, C.: The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked. Guardian 7 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cadwalladr, C., Graham-Harrison, E.: The Cambridge analytica files. Guardian 21, 6–7 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cameron, K.: The laws of identity. Microsoft Corp. 5, 8–11 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capilnean, T.: Evolving trust with applied game theory: recent white paper update describes trust creation through smart contracts (2018). https://www.civic.com/blog/evolving-trust-with-applied-game-theory-recent-white-paper-update-describes-trust-creation-through-smart-contracts/
  11. 11.
    Dunphy, P., Petitcolas, F.A.: A first look at identity management schemes on the blockchain. IEEE Secur. Priv. 16(4), 20–29 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Decentralized identity foundation. https://identity.foundation. Accessed 10 Dec 2019
  13. 13.
    Linux Foundation: Hyperledger indy project. https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/hyperledger-indy. Accessed 10 Dec 2019
  14. 14.
    The SelfKey Foundation: Selfkey technical whitepaper, September 2017. https://selfkey.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/selfkey-whitepaper-en.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2019
  15. 15.
    lifeID: An open-source, blockchain-based platform for self-sovereign identity, September 2017. https://lifeid.io/whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2019
  16. 16.
    Lundkvist, C., Heck, R., Torstensson, J., Mitton, Z., Sena, M.: uPort: a platform for self-sovereign identity (2017). https://whitepaper.uport.me/uPort_whitepaper_DRAFT20170221.pdf
  17. 17.
    Marlinspike, M.: Sovereign source authority (2012). http://www.moxytongue.com/2012/02/what-is-sovereign-source-authority.html. Accessed 23 May 2019
  18. 18.
    de Marneffe, P.: Vice laws and self-sovereignty. Crim. Law Philos. 7(1), 29–41 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9157-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peer Mountain: Working together for better self-sovereign identity: civic, selfkey, and peer mountain (2018). https://medium.com/peermountain/working-together-for-better-self-sovereign-identity-civic-selfkey-and-peer-mountain-282bca9a8e4a
  20. 20.
    MultiChain: Multichain Open source blockchain platform, October 2019. https://www.multichain.com. Accessed 21 Oct 2019
  21. 21.
    Nabi, A.G.: Comparative study on identity management methods using blockchain. Master’s thesis, University of Zurich (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin.org (2017). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2019
  23. 23.
    Nakamoto, S., et al.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Working Paper (2008). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  24. 24.
    OLYMPUS: Oblivious identity management for private and user-friendly services, October 2019. https://olympus-project.eu. Accessed 21 Oct 2019
  25. 25.
    Reed, D., Sporny, M., Longley, D., Allen, C., Grant, R., Sabadello, M.: Decentralized identifiers (DIDs). W3C Credentials Community Group (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    ShoCard: Identity for a mobile world (2019). https://shocard.com
  27. 27.
    Sovrin: Control your digital identity (2019). https://sovrin.org
  28. 28.
    Tobin, A., Reed, D.: The inevitable rise of self-sovereign identity. The Sovrin Foundation, vol. 29 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    uPort: Open identity system for the decentralized web (2019). https://www.uport.me
  30. 30.
    Weik, M.H.: Computer Science and Communications Dictionary. Springer, Boston (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0613-6_8580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bitcoin Wiki: Civic (2019). https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/Civic

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentNTNUGjøvikNorway

Personalised recommendations