Advertisement

Toward a Hybrid Agile Product Development Process

  • Nicola GarzanitiEmail author
  • Clément Fortin
  • Alessandro Golkar
Conference paper
  • 119 Downloads
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 565)

Abstract

Both startups and traditional space industry are exploring new business opportunities and new engineering approaches in what is becoming known now as New Space.

Organizations started accelerating project schedules and challenging the V-model typically used in space product development. The need of a faster and more adaptive response to changing customer needs within an improved development productivity made Agile process a potential key enabler of New Space sector.

On the other hand, space system projects are typically executed in multi-party consortia. Each organization in a consortium adopts its own product development process and interprets “New Space” differently. For this reason, the implementation of Agile is not seamless as it requires coordination with traditional systems engineering approaches. This setup is what we refer to as “hybrid Agile product development process”.

This paper provides a first definition of the architecture of hybrid product development process targeted toward systems development and lifecycle management of hardware projects developed by multi-party consortia. We consider this discussion in the context of the development of spaceflight hardware in the New Space industry. We identify the main challenges in adopting such a methodology in developing hardware systems. This work identifies opportunities of future work for defining coordination approaches in hybrid product development settings, and improved organization structures of hardware projects in hybrid development contexts.

Keywords

Collaborative product development process Hybrid agile process New Space Agile PLM 

References

  1. 1.
    Paikowsky, D.: What Is new space? The changing ecosystem of global space activity. New Space 5, 84–88 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2016.0027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, J.S., Miller, L.E.: INCOSE - Systems Engineering Handbook (2007). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=552393
  3. 3.
    Cooper, R.G.: Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Bus. Horiz. 33, 44–54 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-ICrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beck, K., et al.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001). http://agilemanifesto.org/
  5. 5.
    Thomke, S., Reinertsen, D.: Agile product development: managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. California Manag. Rev. 41, 8–30 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.2307/41165973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang, P.M., Darrin, A.G., Knuth, A.A.: Agile hardware and software system engineering for innovation. In: 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2012.6187425
  7. 7.
    Garzaniti, N., Briatore, S., Fortin, C., Golkar, A.: Effectiveness of the scrum methodology for agile development of space hardware. In: 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2019.8741892
  8. 8.
    Stepanova, D., Ballheimer, W., Van Ginkel, G., Joos, C., Skyrpnyk, I.: Scrum methodology in aerospace projects. In: 69rd International Astronautical Congress, Bremen, Germany (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Unger, D.W., Eppinger, S.D.: Comparing product development processes and managing risk. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 8, 382 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2009.025253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sethi, R., Iqbal, Z.: Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products. J. Market. 72, 118–134 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.1.118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Falcon, S.: The k-Fibonacci difference sequences. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 87, 153–157 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.03.038MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jira | Issue & Project Tracking Software | Atlassian, (n.d.). https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
  13. 13.
    Gregory, P., Barroca, L., Taylor, K., Salah, D., Sharp, H.: Agile challenges in practice: a thematic analysis. In: Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T., Paasivaara, M. (eds.) XP 2015. LNBIP, vol. 212, pp. 64–80. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    NASA, NPR 7120.8 Nasa Procedural Requirements (2008). https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?t=NPR&c=7120&s=5E

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Garzaniti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Clément Fortin
    • 1
  • Alessandro Golkar
    • 1
  1. 1.Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Space CenterMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations