Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Jocey QuinnEmail author
  • Claudia Blandon
Chapter
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Adult Education and Lifelong Learning book series (PSAELL)

Abstract

In this chapter we present our book as an agent of change. We argue against the dominant use of memory, which traps people with dementia and their families in the past. Instead, participatory approaches to learning should be built into all forms of dementia care. We show how our posthumanist perspective has revealed meaningful moments of learning. Rather than being a wasteland for learning, and an absence in lifelong learning agendas, dementia is presented as a site where learning can and should happen as a right. We conclude by arguing that we cannot afford to consign millions of people with dementia and their families to waste. By recognising, fostering and resourcing lifelong learning in dementia a huge contribution to a sustainable planet could be made.

Keywords

Memory Dementia Sustainability Participatory learning Potentia 

References

  1. Alaimo, S. (2016). Exposed: Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Half Way: Quantum Physics and the Entanglements of Matter and Meaning. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. J. J. (2015). The Beautiful Risk of Education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burdick, A. (2016, December 19 & 26). Present Tense: How to Think About Time. The New Yorker, 19 and 26, 68–74.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, R. (2010). The End of Lifelong Learning: A Post-human Condition? Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  8. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Dutham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to Transgress. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, A., & Hoskins, T. K. (2016). A Mark on Paper: The Matter of Indigenous-Settler History. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman Research Practices in Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Quinn, J. (2017). Respecting Young People’s Informal Learning: Circumventing Strategic Policy Evasions. Policy Futures in Education, Special Issue: From Critical Research to Policy, 144–155.Google Scholar
  13. Sabeti, S. (2015). Creative Ageing? Selfhood, Temporality and the Older Adult Learner. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34, 211–229.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2014.987710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Solnit, R. (2019). Whose Story Is It? London: Granta.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plymouth Institute of EducationPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations