Advertisement

Numerical Modeling of CCS-EOR

  • Kun Sang LeeEmail author
  • Jinhyung Cho
  • Ji Ho Lee
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The overall objective of this chapter is to investigate the combined effects of asphaltene and CCS mechanisms on CCS-EOR performance. An integrated model for CCS-EOR with CO2 and LPG addition considering formation damages by asphaltene deposition and three-phase hysteresis have been described. For CCS-EOR in only CO2 fluid system, hysteresis effect reflects the CO2 residual trapping that occupies the pore spaces and displaces water and oil. Therefore, CCS-EOR performance can be underestimated if three-phase effect is not considered. The effects of asphaltene and three-phase hysteresis on CCS and EOR are also explained. If both three-phase hysteresis and asphaltene deposition are applied, CCS-EOR performance is changed because deposited asphaltene improves water mobility and reduces oil and gas mobility. Residual and solubility trappings can be under and overestimated for CCS, respectively, and oil recovery is overestimated for EOR without the integrative model. An integrated model for CO2-LPG WAG is developed to investigate the interacted mechanisms and the effects of LPG on CCS-EOR performance. Since LPG accelerates the asphaltene deposition, the amount of residual trapping is greater than CO2 WAG, but the solubility trapping performance is declined in spite of higher reservoir pressure due to more formation damage. Because the enhancement of residual trapping is greater than that of solubility trapping, it can be confirmed that LPG enhances both CCS and EOR performances during coupled CCS-EOR process. However, the utility of LPG application is also affected by CO2 and LPG prices, so the economic analysis should be accompanied for field practical use.

Keywords

Hysteresis Residual trapping Solubility trapping CCS-EOR Asphaltene deposition 

References

  1. Agarwal A, Parsons J (2011) Commercial structures for integrated CCS-EOR projects. Energy Procedia 4:5786–5793.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachu S, Gunter WD (2005) Overview of acid-gas injection operations in Western Canada. In: Rubin ES, Keith DW, Gilboy CF, Wilson M, Morris T, Gale J, Thambimuthu K (eds) Greenhouse gas control technologies 7. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, pp 443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachu S, Shaw J (2003) Evaluation of the CO2 sequestration capacity in Alberta’s oil and gas reservoirs at depletion and the effect of underlying aquifers. J Can Pet Technol 42(9):51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beecy DJ, Kuuskraa VA (2005) Basin strategies for linking CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage of CO2 emissions. In: Rubin ES, Keith DW, Gilboy CF, Wilson M, Morris T, Gale J, Thambimuthu K (eds) Greenhouse gas control technologies 7. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, pp 351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco ST, Rivas C, Fernández J, Artal M, Velasco I (2012) Influence of methane in CO2 transport and storage for CCS technology. Environ Sci Technol 46(23):13016–13023.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es3037737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao M, Gu Y (2013) Oil recovery mechanisms and asphaltene precipitation phenomenon in immiscible and miscible CO2 flooding processes. Fuel 109:157–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho J, Kim TH, Chang N, Lee KS (2019) Effects of asphaltene deposition-derived formation damage on three-phase hysteretic models for prediction of coupled CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage performance. J Petrol Sci Eng 172:988–997.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correra S, De Simoni M, Bartosek M, Colombani G, Diatto P, Maddinelli G, Parracello VP (2010) Assessment of asphaltene deposition risk in an EOR intervention through CO2 injection. In: Paper presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 Sep 2010.  https://doi.org/10.2118/135001-ms
  9. Darabi H, Shirdel M, Kalaei MH, Sepehrnoori K (2014) Aspects of modeling asphaltene deposition in a compositional coupled wellbore/reservoir simulator. In: Paper presented at the SPE improved oil recovery symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 12–16 April 2014.  https://doi.org/10.2118/169121-ms
  10. De Visser E, Hendriks C, Barrio M, Mølnvik MJ, de Koeijer G, Liljemark S, Le Gallo Y (2008) Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2(4):478–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis BR, Crandell LE, Peters CA (2010) Limitations for brine acidification due to SO2 co-injection in geologic carbon sequestration. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4(3):575–582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ettehadtavakkol A, Lake LW, Bryant SL (2014) CO2-EOR and storage design optimization. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 25:79–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khanifar A, Sheykh Alian S, Demiral B, Darman NB (2011) Study of asphaltene precipitation and deposition phenomenon during WAG application. In: Paper presented at the SPE enhanced oil recovery conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 19–21 July 2011.  https://doi.org/10.2118/143488-ms
  14. Kheshgi HS, Bhore NA, Hirsch R, Parker ME, Teletzke GF, Thomann H (2010) Perspectives on CCS cost and economics. In: Paper presented at the SPE international conference on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 10–12 Nov 2010.  https://doi.org/10.2118/139716-ms
  15. Kovscek AR, Cakici D (2005) Geologic storage of carbon dioxide and enhanced oil recovery. II. Cooptimization of storage and recovery. Energy Convers Manag 46:1941–1956.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2004.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuuskraa V, Leewen TV, Wallace M (2011) Improving domestic energy security and lowering CO2 emissions with ‘next generation’ CO2-enhanced oil recovery. NETL, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Leach A, Mason CF, Veld K (2011) Co-optimization of enhanced oil recovery and carbon sequestration. Resour Energy Econ 33(4):893–912.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moritis G (2003) CO2 sequestration adds new dimension to oil, gas production. Oil Gas J 101(9):39–44Google Scholar
  19. Oosterkamp A, Ramsen J (2008) State-of-the-art overview of CO2 pipeline transport with relevance to offshore pipelines. POLYTEC, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  20. Palandri JL, Kharaka YK (2005) Ferric iron-bearing sediments as a mineral trap for CO2 sequestration: iron reduction using sulfur-bearing waste gas. Chem Geol 217(3):351–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.12.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sass BM, Farzan H, Prabhakar R, Gerst J, Sminchak J, Bhargava M, Nestleroth B, Figueroa J (2009) Considerations for treating impurities in oxy-combustion flue gas prior to sequestration. Energy Procedia 1(1):535–542.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seevam PN, Race JM, Downie MJ (2007) Carbon dioxide pipelines for sequestration in the UK: an engineering gap analysis. J Pipeline Eng 6:141–162Google Scholar
  23. Stevens SH, Kuuskraa VA, Gale J, Beecy D (2001) CO2 injection and sequestration in depleted oil and gas fields and deep coal seams: worldwide potential and costs. Environ Geosci 8(3):200–209.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-0984.2001.008003200.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Veld K, Mason CF, Leach A (2013) The economics of CO2 sequestration through enhanced oil recovery. Energy Procedia 37:6909–6919.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang C, Li T, Gao H, Zhao J, Li HA (2017) Effect of asphaltene precipitation on CO2-flooding performance in low-permeability sandstones: a nuclear magnetic resonance study. RSC Adv 7(61):38367–38376.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA06392JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang J, Ryan D, Anthony EJ, Wigston A (2011) Effects of impurities on geological storage of CO2. IEAGHG, Stoke Orchard, Cheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Zanganeh P, Dashti H, Ayatollahi S (2015) Visual investigation and modeling of asphaltene precipitation and deposition during CO2 miscible injection into oil reservoirs. Fuel 160:132–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth Resources and Environmental EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)
  2. 2.Department of Earth Resources and Environmental EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)
  3. 3.E&P Technology CenterKorea National Oil CorporationUlsanKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations