Advertisement

Leaders and Laggards in U.S. Brewing: Political Trajectories and Brewery Density

  • Bartholomew WatsonEmail author
Chapter
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Viewed at a national level, patterns of brewery density in the United States (U.S.) appear to simply mirror population density. However, when we begin comparing States, we find great divergence in the concentration of breweries, exceeding that of even more diverse economic and demographic regions like Europe. Digging deeper, a further puzzle emerges: these differences have largely persisted over time, starting during the emergence of small brewers, even as the rules and regulations concerning brewing have largely converged. This chapter explains this puzzle through a political lens, explaining how the interplay of economic interests, political coalitions, and regulatory conditions buttressed and enhanced first mover advantages. These political forces created a longer term trajectory wherein small brewers in leading states were able to preserve, and in many cases widen their advantages relative to other states.

Keywords

Brewery density State regulation Historical trajectories American states 

References

  1. All About Beer (2015) When brewpubs started booming [Blog post]. http://allaboutbeer.com/when-brewpubs-started-booming/
  2. American Craft Beer (2016) The state of American craft beer, Mississippi [Blog post]. http://www.americancraftbeer.com/the-state-of-american-craft-beer-mississippi/
  3. Barajas J, Boeing G, Wartell J (2017) Neighborhood change, one pint at a time: the impact of local characteristics on craft breweries. In: Chapman NG, Lellock JS, Lippard CD (eds) Untapped: exploring the cultural dimensions of craftbeer. West Virginia University Press, Morgantown, pp 155–176Google Scholar
  4. Beers of SC (2014) The stone bill, what it does [Blog post]. https://beerofsc.com/2014/04/16/the-stone-bill-what-it-does/
  5. Burgdorf JE (2016) Essays on mandated vertical restraints. All Dissertations. 1659Google Scholar
  6. David P (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev, 332Google Scholar
  7. Dobbin F (1994) Forging industrial policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the railway age. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elzinga KG, Tremblay CH, Tremblay VJ (2015) Craft beer in the United States: history, numbers, and geography. J Wine Econ 10(03):242–274Google Scholar
  9. Esping-Andersen G, Korpi W (1984) Social policy as class politics in post-war capitalism. In: Goldthorpe J (ed) Order and conflict in contemporary capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 179–208Google Scholar
  10. Fourcade M (2009) Economists and societies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerschenkron A (1962) Economic backwardness in historical perspective: a book of essays. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Gould SJ, Eldredge N (1977) Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3(2):115–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall PA, Taylor R (1996) Political science and the three ‘New Institutionalisms’. Polit Stud, 936–957Google Scholar
  14. Heclo H (1974) Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: from relief to income maintenance. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  15. Herald Tribune (2013) Florida Beer Distributor Group Says Small Brewers are Unfairly Competing with Retailers [Web article]. http://ticket.heraldtribune.com/2013/12/04/florida-beer-distributor-group-says-small-brewers-are-unfairly-competing-with-retailers/
  16. Huber E, Stephens JD (2001) Development and crisis of the welfare state: parties and policies in global markets. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Immergut EM (1992) Health politics: interests and institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Iversen T, Soskice D (2001) An asset theory of social policy preference. Am Polit Sci Rev, 875–893Google Scholar
  19. Katzenstein PJ (1985) Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Knight J (1992) Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matson T, Dorr LA (1975) Mountain brew: a high spirited guide to country-style beer. Countryman PressGoogle Scholar
  22. McCullough MP, Berning J, Hanson JL (2017) If you brew It they will come: homebrewing legalization and the craft brewing industry. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  23. Moe T (2005) Power and political institutions. Perspect Polit 3(2):215–234Google Scholar
  24. Nielsen (2019) “Craft Insights Panel.” Conducted by Nielsen-Harris on behalf of the Brewers Association.Google Scholar
  25. Nilsson I, Reid N, Lehnert M (2017) Geographic patterns of craft breweries at the intraurban scale. Prof Geogr.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1338590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noble DF (1984) Forces of production: a social history of industrial automation. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Northern Virginia Mag (2014) With Farm Brewery Legislation Passed, Exepct the next wave of Northern Virginia Beer [Web article]. https://www.northernvirginiamag.com/food/food-news/2014/02/27/with-farm-brewery-legislation-passed-expect-the-next-wave-of-nova-beer/
  28. Palamountain JC (1955) The politics of distribution. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. PDX Monthly (2015) The Law that Changed Oregon’s Beer culture forever [Web article]. https://www.pdxmonthly.com/articles/2016/3/8/the-law-that-changed-oregons-beer-culture-forever-june-2015
  30. Pierson P (2000) Not just what, but when: timing and sequence in political processes. Stud Am polit dev 14:72–92Google Scholar
  31. Pierson P (2004) Politics in time: history, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Piore MJ, Sable CF (1984) The second industrial divide: possibilities for prosperity. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  33. Porter M (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv Bus RevGoogle Scholar
  34. Press Herald (2016) As Brewery Tasting Rooms Thrive, In Greater Portland Traditional Bars in a Froth [Web article]. http://www.pressherald.com/2016/02/27/as-brewery-tasting-rooms-thrive-in-greater-portland-traditional-bars-in-a-froth/
  35. Rose R (1990) Inheritance before choice in public policy. J Theor Polit 2(3):263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sorini M (2016) Keynote: issues, opportunities and challenges in a dynamic industry. In: Presentation to the colorado alcohol beverage symposiumGoogle Scholar
  37. Tax and Trade Bureau. Frequently requested FOIA documents [Web page]. https://www.ttb.gov/foia/frl.shtml
  38. US News (2014) Virginia Taxpayer Handouts for Craft Brewers Pour Money Down the Drain. [Web article]. https://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/2014/11/03/virginia-taxpayer-handouts-for-craft-brewers-pour-money-down-the-drain
  39. Watson B (2014) The rise of the Microbrewery Taproom [Blog post]. https://www.brewersassociation.org/insights/microbrewery-tap-room/
  40. Watson B (2011) Nations of retailers: the comparative political economy of retail trade. Dissertation. http://dissertations.umi.com/berkeley:11712
  41. Wilensky H (2002) Rich democracies: political economy, public policy and performance. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams A (2017) Exploring the impact of legislation on the development of craft beer. Beverages. http://www.mdpi.com/2306-5710/3/2/18/pdf
  43. Williamson O (1983) Markets and hierarchies: a study in the internal organizations. Free PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Zysman J (1994) How institutions create historically rooted trajectories of growth. Ind Corp Change 3(1):243–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brewers AssociationBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations