Advertisement

Recent Approaches to Drift Effects in Credit Rating Models

  • Rachael Chikoore
  • Okuthe P. KogedaEmail author
  • S. O. Ojo
Conference paper
  • 61 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 311)

Abstract

Credit Rating is the valuation of the credit worthiness of the borrowing entity, which gives an indication of the borrower’s current credit position and the probability of default. A credit rating model must be very accurate in doing its predictions because critical decisions are made based on the classification that would have been made for the prospective borrower. Different changes occur in the environment that would have been used to come up with the initial model, which might not be applicable to the current sample population and this might have an effect on the prediction accuracy. Changes to the data stream, economic climate, social and cultural environment may cause a drift. Drift shows that there is a change in probability distribution of the concept under study. Population drift is an example of concept drift. Having a static credit rating model will bring challenges in future predictions, hence, there is the need for designing a dynamic credit rating system that caters for the changes that might occur to the initial population sample in order to maintain the prediction accuracy of the model. In this paper, a detailed literature study was conducted exploring recent solution approaches to drift effect in credit rating models. A comprehensive recent solutions is presented in this paper that could be a source of information of interested researchers.

Keywords

Credit rating Drift effect Concept drift Population drift Prediction Approaches Credit rating models Probability distribution 

References

  1. 1.
    Žliobaitė, I., Pechenizkiy, M., Gama, J.: An overview of concept drift applications. In: Japkowicz, N., Stefanowski, J. (eds.) Big Data Analysis: New Algorithms for a New Society. SBD, vol. 16, pp. 91–114. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26989-4_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pavlidis, N.G., Tasoulis, D.K., Adams, N.M., Hand, D.J.: Adaptive consumer credit classification. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63(12), 1645–1654 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang, S., Day, M.: A comparative study of data mining techniques for credit scoring in banking. In: IEEE IRI, San Francisco, California, USA, 14–16 August 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, Z., et al.: Credit rating analysis with support vector machines and neural networks: a market comparative study. Decis. Support Syst. 37(4), 543–558 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keramati, A., Yousefi, N.: A proposed classification of data mining techniques in credit scoring. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paleologo, G., Elisseeff, A., Antonini, G.: Subagging for credit scoring models. J. Oper. Res. 201(2), 490–499 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, X.L., Zhong, Y.: An overview of personal credit scoring: techniques and future work. Int. J. Intell. Sci. 2(04), 181 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luo, S.T., Cheng, B.W., Hsieh, C.H.: Prediction model building with clustering-launched classification and support vector machines in credit scoring. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(4), 7562–7566 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fogarty, D.J.: Using genetic algorithms for credit scoring system maintenance functions. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Appl. 3(6), 1 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hand, D.J., Adams, N.M.: Selection bias in credit scorecard evaluation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65(3), 408–415 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelly, M.G., Hand, D.J., Adams, N.M.: The impact of changing populations on classifier performance. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 367–371. ACM, August 1999Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kadwe, Y., Suryawanshi, V.: A review on concept drift. IOSR J. Comput. Eng. 17, 20–26 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knotek, J., Pereira, W.: Survey on Concept Drift. Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, Portugal. https://is.muni.cz/el/1433/podzim2011/PA164/um/drift_detection_methods.pdf
  14. 14.
    Sun, Y., Tang, K., Zhu, Z., Yao, X.: Concept drift adaptation by exploiting historical knowledge. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 29, 4822–4832 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zliobaite, I., et al.: Next challenges for adaptive learning systems. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsl 14(1), 48–55 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krempl, G., Hofer, V.: Classification in presence of drift and latency. In: 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 596–603. IEEE, December 2011Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wei, G., Mingshu, C.: A new dynamic credit scoring model based on clustering ensemble. In: 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adams, N.M., Tasoulis, D.K., Anagnostopoulos, C., Hand, D.J.: Temporally-adaptive linear classification for handling population drift in credit scoring. In: Lechevallier, Y., Saporta, G. (eds.) Proceedings of COMPSTAT’2010, pp. 167–176. Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2604-3_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nikolaidis, D., Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: Exploring population drift on consumer credit behavioral scoring. In: Grigoroudis, E., Doumpos, M. (eds.) Operational Research in Business and Economics. SPBE, pp. 145–165. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33003-7_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whittaker, J., Whitehead, C., Somers, M.: A dynamic scorecard for monitoring baseline performance with application to tracking a mortgage portfolio. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58(7), 911–921 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romanyuk, K.: A dynamic credit scoring model based on contour subspaces. In: Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys). IntelliSys (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Babu, R., Satish, A.R.: Improved of k-nearest neighbor techniques in credit scoring. Int. J. Dev. Comput. Sci. Technol. 1(2), 1–4 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barakat, L., Pavlidis, N., Crone, S.: A context-aware approach for handling concept drift in classification (Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University) (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bifet, A., Gama, J., Pechenizkiy, M., Liobait, I.: Handling concept drift: importance challenges & solutions. Tutorial. In: Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baena-Garcia, M., del Campo-Ávila, J., Fidalgo, R., Bifet, A., Gavalda, R., Morales-Bueno, R.: Early drift detection method. In: Fourth International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams, vol. 6, pp. 77–86, September 2006Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klinkenberg, R., Joachims, T.: Detecting concept drift with support vector machines. In: ICML, pp. 487–494, June 2000Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hofer, V., Krempl, G.: Predicting and Monitoring Changes in Scoring Data (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsymbal, A.: The problem of concept drift: definitions and related work, vol. 106, no. 2. Computer Science Department, Trinity College Dublin (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ang, H.H., Gopalkrishnan, V., Zliobaite, I., Pechenizkiy, M., Hoi, S.C.: Predictive handling of asynchronous concept drifts in distributed environments. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(10), 2343–2355 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zliobaite, I., Bifet, A., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B.: MOA concept drift active learning strategies for streaming data. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Applications of Pattern Analysis, pp. 48–55, October 2011Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bhatia, S., Sharma, P., Burman, R., Hazari, S., Hande, R.: Credit scoring using machine learning techniques. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 161(11), 1 (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bifet, A., Holmes, G., Kirkby, R., Pfahringer, B.: MOA: massive online analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 1601–1604 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kogeda, O.P., Vumane, N.N.: A model augmenting credit risk management in the banking industry. Int. J. Technol. Diffus. (IJTD) 8(4), 47–66 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chikoore, R., Kogeda, O.P.: A credit rating model for Zimbabwe. In: Proceedings of the Southern Africa Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (SATNAC), Fancourt, George, Western Cape, South Africa, 4–7 September 2016, pp. 88–89 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bhebe, W., Kogeda, O.P.: Shilling attack detection in collaborative recommender systems using a meta learning strategy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Emerging Trends in Networks and Computer Communications, ETNCC 2015, Windhoek Country Club Resort, Namibia, 17–20 May 2015, pp. 56–61 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachael Chikoore
    • 1
  • Okuthe P. Kogeda
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. O. Ojo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Communication TechnologyTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Informatics, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural SciencesUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations