Advertisement

Psychomotricity in Elderly People with Hearing Impairment

  • Ana Caldeira
  • Carolina Barroso
  • Joana Carapinha
  • Laura Nogueira
  • Mariana GameiroEmail author
  • Soraia Matias
  • César João Vicente da Fonseca
Conference paper
  • 43 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1185)

Abstract

During life, there are several stages where one of the endings is aging. This aging causes several changes in the motor, physical and cognitive levels. There are several types of aging, such as primary, secondary and tertiary.

During adulthood, there is a gradual hearing loss that intensifies around the age of 50 (presbycusis). These hearing impairments increase with age and can affect 31.6% of elderly people between 65 and 74 years and 62.1% with 85 years or more (data taken from the American population).

Objective: Identify the consequences that these hearing impairments have on the lives of elderly people and the role of psychomotricity and how it can minimize the impact of these impairments on their daily lives.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was carried out through the EBSCO host (MEDLINE with Full Text and MedicLatina).

Results: Several consequences were found, with emphasis on: “Effects of hearing aids on cognitive functions and depressive signs in elderly people”, “Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk, factors and strategies for prevention” and “Application of a computer-based neurocognitive assessment battery in the elderly with and without hearing loss”.

Conclusion: Psychomotricity, can then, intervene with these people on an emotional level and even on the level of gait and balance. Therefore, it is an added value for these elderly people to benefit from a psychomotor intervention.

Keywords

Elderly Hearing impairment Psychomotricity Rehabilitation psychomotor Rehabilitation Hearing loss 

References

  1. 1.
    Fonseca, J.V.C., Rebelo, T.: Nursing care needs of the caregiver of persons under palliative care. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 64(1), 180–184 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-71672011000100026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fonseca, J.C., Lopes, M.J., Ramos, A.F.: People with pain and intervention needs: systematic literature review. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem 66(5), 771–778 (2013). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mnh&AN=24217763&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 10 Dec 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rebelo Botelho, M.A., Fonseca, C., Suhonen, R., Lima Basto, M., Ramos, A.: Intervenções de Enfermagem Individualizadas: Uma Revisão da Literatura. Pensar Enfermagem 19, 47–61 (2015). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=111389074&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 10 Dec 2019Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fonseca, C., Ramos, A., Vilelas, J., Castro, C., Botelho, M.A.: Outcomes of individualized nursing interventions: a systematic review of iterature. Rev Rene 13(2), 470–479 (2012). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=108133199&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 10 Dec 2019Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porto Gautério, D., Zortea, B., Costa Santos, S.S., da Silva, T.B., Lopes, M.J., Fonseca, C.J.: Risk factors for new accidental falls in elderly patients at traumatology ambulatory center. Investigacion & Educacion en Enfermeria 33(1), 35–43 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v33n1a05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fonseca, C., Franco, T., Ramos, A., Silva, C.: The individual with leg ulcer and structured nursing care intervention: a systematic literature review. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP 46(2), 480–486 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1590/s0080-62342012000200029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lourenço, C., Pinto, A., Pereira, C., et al.: Trust versus distrust in care relation: nurse-client trust, a concept in construction in CHLN-HPV. Pensar Enfermagem 15(2), 3–13 (2011). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=104453975&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 10 Dec 2019Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fineout-Overholt, E., et al.: Evidence-based practice step by step: critical appraisal of the evidence: part I. AJN Am. J. Nurs. 110(7), 47–52 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nascimento, V., Fonseca, C., Marques, M.C., Costa, A.: Sensitive indicators to rehabilitation nursing care in a rehabilitation program for people in the surgical process, based on the health quality model. In: García-Alonso, J., Fonseca, C. (eds.) IWoG 2018. CCIS, vol. 1016, pp. 283–294. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16028-9_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santos, M., Moreira, R., Saldanha, R., Palmeiro, S., Fonseca, C.: Psychomotor intervention using biofeedback technology for the elderly with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In: García-Alonso, J., Fonseca, C. (eds.) IWoG 2018. CCIS, vol. 1016, pp. 216–221. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16028-9_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Löhler, J., Cebulla, M., Shehata-Dieler, W., Volkenstein, S., Völter, C., Walther, L.E.: Hearing impairment in old age: detection, treatment, and associated risks. Deutsches Aerzteblatt International. 116(17), 301–310 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.0301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wales, K., Salkeld, G., Clemson, L., et al.: A trial based economic evaluation of occupational therapy discharge planning for older adults: the HOME randomized trial. Clin. Rehabil. 32(7), 919–929 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518764249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Acar, B., Yurekli, M.F., Babademez, M.A., Karabulut, H., Karasen, R.M.: Effects of hearing aids on cognitive functions and depressive signs in elderly people. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 52(3), 250–252 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.04.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    dos Santos Baraldi, G., de Almeida, L.C., Calais, L.L., de Carvalho Borges, A.C., Gielow, I., De Cunto, M.R.: Study of the fundamental frequency in elderly women with hearing loss. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 73(3), 378–383 (2007). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mnh&AN=17684659&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 10 Dec 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Da Luz, V.B., Da Silva, M.C., Scharlach, R.C., Iório, M.C.M.: Correlação entre as restrições de participação em atividades de vida diária e o benefício do uso de próteses auditivas em adultos e idosos. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia. 16(2), 160–166 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-80342011000200009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knopke, S., Olze, H.: Hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants and cognitive abilities. HNO 66(5), 364–368 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-017-0423-zCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bruce, H., Aponte, D., St-Onge, N., Phillips, N., Gagné, J.-P., Li, K.Z.H.: The effects of age and hearing loss on dual-task balance and listening. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 74(2), 275–283 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stark, P., Hickson, L.: Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int. J. Audiol. 43(7), 390–398 (2004). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=106567703&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 10 Dec (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nascimento, G.B., de Oliveira Schiling, N., Ubal, S.R., Vieira Biaggio, E.P., Kessler, T.M.: Socio-economic classification and quality of life of family members of children and teenagers with hearing disability. Revista CEFAC 18(3), 657–666 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201618313215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychomotor Rehabilitation in Évora UniversityÉvoraPortugal
  2. 2.Évora UniversityÉvoraPortugal

Personalised recommendations