Advertisement

Peripheral Venipuncture in Elderly Patients: Is Near-Infrared Light Technology an Option to Avoid Vein Depletion?

  • Paulo Santos-CostaEmail author
  • Liliana B. Sousa
  • Beatriz Serambeque
  • Rafael Bernardes
  • Pedro Parreira
  • Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira
  • Margarida Vieira
  • João Graveto
Conference paper
  • 43 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1185)

Abstract

Background: Peripheral venipuncture is the minimal invasive procedure most commonly performed in acute settings. However, several publications report that health professionals perform multiple puncture attempts until a successful catheterization or blood draw is achieved. Among the patients most affected by this reality are the elderly patients, who often display a number of factors that increase difficulty. In recent years, several recent technological aids, such as the Near-Infrared Light, have emerged in the medical devices market as potential facilitators of vein selection and puncture. However, while Near-Infrared Light devices are widely studied in pediatric settings, there are no known reviews of its use and applicability with elderly patients. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Study relevance, data extraction, and synthesis were performed by two independent reviewers. Results: Three studies were included in this review. The use of NIR technology may improve the number of peripheral veins located in elderly patients, as well as reduce hematoma development and patient anxiety before, during and after the procedure. Moreover, one study briefly explored health professionals’ usability and technology acceptance related outcomes. Conclusions: While peripheral venipuncture of elderly patients assisted by NIR devices is still an understudied area, the studies found indicated results favorable to its clinical application. However, such results should be carefully analyzed, since potential bias and lack of larger study samples may prevent the generalization of the results.

Keywords

Peripheral venipuncture Near-Infrared Light Elderly 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This review was carried out under the PhD program of the first author (grant SFRH/BD/136487/2018), funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through funds from the POPH/ESF programs. The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), hosted by the Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC).

References

  1. 1.
    OECD: Health at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris. OECD (2017). (Health at a Glance)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs Publications. World Population Ageing 2007 (Internet). Population (English Edition) (2007). http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/WPA2007/Full_text.pdf
  3. 3.
    Lomonte, C., Forneris, G., Gallieni, M., Tazza, L., Meola, M., Lodi, M., et al.: The vascular access in the elderly: a position statement of the Vascular Access Working Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology. J Nephrol. 29(2), 175–184 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandão, D., Ribeiro, O., Freitas, A., Paúl, C.: Hospital admissions by the oldest old: past trends in one of the most ageing countries in the world. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 17(11), 2255–2265 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braga, L.M.: Práticas de enfermagem e a segurança do doente no processo de punção de vasos e na administraçãpo da terapêutica endovenosa (2017). http://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/31677
  6. 6.
    Grüne, F., Kiel, C., Grüne, F., Schrappe, M., Basten, J., Wenchel, H.M., et al.: Phlebitis rate and time kinetics of short peripheral intravenous catheters phlebitis rate and time kinetics of short peripheral intravenous catheters. Infection 32, 30–32 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-004-1037-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wallis, M.C., McGrail, M., Webster, J., Marsh, N., Gowardman, J., Playford, E.G., et al.: Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 35(1), 63–68 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braga, L.M., Parreira, P.M., de Oliveira, A.S.S., dos Mónico, L.S.M., Arreguy-Sena, C., Henriques, M.A.: Phlebitis and infiltration: vascular trauma associated with the peripheral venous catheter. Rev. Lat. Am. Enfermagem. 26, e3002 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Infusion Nurses Society (INS). Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice. J. Infus. Nurs. 39(Suppl. 1), S1–159 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oliveira, A., Graveto, J., Osório, N., Costa, P., Oliveira, V., Costa, F., et al.: Potential for contamination of tourniquets during peripheral venipuncture: a scoping review protocol. Rev. Enferm. Ref. IV Série(17), 143–148 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Standards of infusion therapy. R. Coll. Nurs. 2009, 1–9 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curtis, S.J., Craig, W.R., Logue, E., Vandermeer, B., Hanson, A., Klassen, T.: Ultrasound or near-infrared vascular imaging to guide peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 187(8), 563–570 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.141012. http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L611648220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fekonja, Z., Pajnkihar, M.: Uporaba sodobnih biomedicinskih pripomočkov za vzpostavljanje periferne venske poti v zdravstveni oskrbi pacienta: pregled literature. Obzornik zdravstvene nege 51(1), 52–74 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun, C.Y., Lee, K.C., Lin, I.H., Wu, C.L., Huang, H.P., Lin, Y.Y., et al.: Near-infrared light device can improve intravenous cannulation in critically ill children. Pediatr. Neonatol. 54(3), 194–197 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.12.012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peters, M.D.J., McInerney, G.C., Baldini Soares, C., Khalil, H., Parker, D.: Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris, E., Munn, Z. (eds.) Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide (2017). https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/. Accessed 08 Aug 2019
  16. 16.
    Peters, M.D., Godfrey, C.M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., Soares, C.B.: Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 13(3), 141–146 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al.: PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMAScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Inter. Med. 169(7), 467–473 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chiao, F., Resta-Flarer, F., Lesser, J., Ng, J., Ganz, A., Pino-Luey, D., et al.: Vein visualization: patient characteristic factors and efficacy of a new infrared vein finder technology. Br. J. Anaesth. 110(6), 966–971 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guillon, P., Makhloufi, M., Baillie, S., Roucoulet, C., Dolimier, E., Masquelier, A.: Prospective evaluation of venous access difficulty and a near-infrared vein visualizer at four French haemophilia treatment centres. Haemophilia 21(1), 21–26 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.12513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fumagalli, S., Torricelli, G., Massi, M., Calvani, S., Boni, S., Roberts, A., et al.: Effects of a new device to guide venous puncture in elderly critically ill patients: results of a pilot randomized study. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 29(2), 335–339 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0547-0CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lamperti, M., Pittiruti II, M.: Difficult peripheral veins: turn on the lights. Br. J. Anaesth. 110(6), 888–891 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet078CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gottlieb, M., Sundaram, T., Holladay, D., Nakitende, D.: Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous line placement: a narrative review of evidence-based best practices. West. J. Emerg. Med. 18(6), 1047–1054 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.7.34610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E)Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC)CoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Instituto Ciências da SaúdePortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations