Advertisement

Hungarian - Slovakian Cooperation Making Aerial Firefighting More Effective: Error Analysis

  • Agoston RestasEmail author
Conference paper
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

In many cases, suppressing forest fires are very difficult. On the one hand, the location of the fire can be so far from the fire department it takes a long time to reach by ground forces or the place of the fire front can be at such a special place the intervention is impossible to carry out by hand crew. On the other hand, the fire intensity can be so high the protection of the ground forces is not enough to carry out the suppression. In these cases, aerial firefighting can be not just an effective solution to suppress the fire front but even the only way to stop fire. That is also well known, against the effectiveness of the aerial firefighting, this method is a very expensive tool. Using mostly picture analysis, this study focuses on the tactical mistakes of the aerial firefighting to prevent wastes of the process. Summarizing the results, even if the aerial firefighting can be a very effective tool suppressing the fire, in many cases, pilots and managers make not just simply mistakes reducing the potential of the effectiveness of the method but even carry out such maneuvers which are not only ineffective but can cause even dangerous situations. This study based on a Hungarian – Slovakian cooperation during I4F project, which supported by the EU Horizon 2020 program.

Keywords

Forest fire Aerial firefighting Effectiveness 

References

  1. 1.
    Velas R, Majlingova A, Kacikova D (2018) Study of forest fire behavior under the meteorological conditions changed. In: Scientific conference on earth in a trap? Zvolen, Slovakia, 23 May 2018Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Teknos L (2018) The complexity and methods of citizen emergency preparedness. Hadmernok 13(3):306–325Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ray K (2015) Is aerial firefighting worth it? Aerial firefighting is dangerous, expensive and environmentally damaging. So why do we do it? Report, high country news, August 03 2015. https://www.hcn.org/issues/47.13/after-a-record-setting-wildfire-a-washington-county-prepares-for-the-next-one/the-cost-benefit-analysis-of-aerial-firefighting
  4. 4.
    Frontline wildfire defense report: aerial firefighting: dangerous. But is it effective? (2016). https://www.frontlinewildfire.com/aerial-wildfire-fighting-how-effective-is-it/
  5. 5.
    Michelson M (2016) Can this $10 million firefighting machine actually stop fires? Outside Mag. https://www.outsideonline.com/2079591/can-10-million-firefighting-machine-actually-stop-fires
  6. 6.
    Legendre D, Becker R, Almeras E, Chassagne A (2014) Air tanker drop patterns. Int J Wildland Fire 23(2):272–280.  https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13029 CSIRO PublishingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Plucinski MA, Pastor E (2013) Criteria and methodology for evaluating aerial wildfire suppression. Int J Wildland Fire 13(22):1144–1154.  https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pekić Z (2017) High rate spray technique – a new way for effective aerial wildfire suppression. In: Wildfire 2007 International Wildland Fire Conference, Seville, SpainGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fanfarová A, Osvaldová LM, Gaspercová S (2016) Testing of fire retardants. Appl Mech Mater 861:72–79.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.861.72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beutling A, Batista AC, Soares VR (2012) Fire behavior modeling in laboratory experiments. In: Spano DV (ed) Modelling fire behavior and risk. Universita di Sassari, SassariGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Serna J (2019) Firefighting aircraft ‘increasingly ineffective’ amid worsening wildfires. Los Angeles times, report, April 07 2019. https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-aircraft-increasingly-ineffective-against-california-wildfires-20190407-story.html
  12. 12.
    Hardy C (1985) Chemicals for forest fire fighting. Research study. NFPA, National Fire Protection Association, Boston (1985)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silva FR (2002) Investigación y Capitalización de la Experiencia en el Empleo de Medios Aéros en la Defensa Contra los Incendios Forestales, La gestión de los Medios Aéros en la defensa conzta los incendios forestales, I Simposium Internacional, Córdoba, SpainGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gabbert B (2012) Aerial firefighting, pictures report, fire aviation, May 11 2012. https://fireaviation.com
  15. 15.
    The Guardian (2018) Report about Simi Valley Fire, November 13 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_tgKyZy45Y
  16. 16.
    Gabbert B (2017) Tanker 116 sees action at Phoenix. Fire aviation. In: Fox10 news, Report: brush fire in California, June 22 2017. https://fireaviation.com/tag/t-116/
  17. 17.
    Thompson D (2018) Firefighter’s death caused by retardant drop from 747. AP news, September 15 2018. https://apnews.com/7b72b8c13e454d46ac5489cec4cdbc3c/Firefighter’s-death-caused-by-retardant-drop-from-747
  18. 18.
    CalFireTV (2019) Aerial firefighting drop safety video, August 23 2019. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONdSoiI4zIA
  19. 19.
    Gabbert B (2014) Aerial firefighting, Pictures report, Fire aviation, August 22 2014. https://fireaviation.com

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of Public ServiceBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations