Abstract
Health care data are collected and managed by multiple organizations, often residing in information systems that are disconnected from the rest of the health system. Interoperability and health information exchange (HIE) are concepts that describe methods for data to be shared among these data siloes. Public health organizations are both senders and receivers of data, and there exist multiple efforts to facilitate HIE and interoperability in health systems around the world. This chapter explores HIE and interoperability in the context of public health. The chapter describes how HIE efforts are enabling health care providers to report infectious as well as chronic disease data to public health agencies. Furthermore, the chapter examines activities such as syndromic surveillance and public health registries from an interoperability perspective. The chapter also examines the drivers and barriers to HIE from a public health context, and it explore trends likely to influence interoperability in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Non-federal acute care hospital electronic health record adoption. In: Health IT Quick-Stat #47. 2017. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Hospital-EHR-Adoption.php. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Office-based Physician Electronic Health Record Adoption. In: Health IT Quick-Stat #50. 2019. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/physician-ehr-adoption-trends.php. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Lee Y-T, Park Y-T, Park J-S, Yi B-K. Association between electronic medical record system adoption and healthcare information technology infrastructure. Healthcare Inform Res. 2018;24(4):327–34. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2018.24.4.327.
The Commonwealth Fund. What is the status of electronic health records? https://international.commonwealthfund.org/features/ehrs/. Accessed 25 Sep 2019.
Washington V, DeSalvo K, Mostashari F, Blumenthal D. The HITECH era and the path forward. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(10):904–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1703370.
Bates DW, Samal L. Interoperability: what is it, how can we make it work for clinicians, and how should we measure it in the future? Health Serv Res. 2018;53(5):3270–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12852.
Duncan KA. Evolving community health information networks. Front Health Serv Manage. 1995;12(1):5–41. Discussion 2–3, 60–1.
Dixon BE. What is health information exchange? In: Dixon BE, editor. Health information exchange: navigating and managing a network of health information systems. Waltham: Academic; 2016. p. 3–20.
Sun-Sentinel. Gingrich: ‘rethink medicare’ house speaker charts his vision on health care. Final ed. Sun-Sentinel. 1995.
Schwartz J. Health-care bill limits privacy critics say patients’ records will be exposed. Washington Post; 1996. p. a07.
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. A strategy for building the national health information infrastructure. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.
Lohr S. Some specialists foresee a gigantic computer network taking health care into a new age of shared information. New York Times. 2004.
Bush stops in Baltimore to push health proposal; President advances use of computer technology to improve medical care. Final ed. [database on the Internet]; 2004. https://search-proquest-com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/docview/406601329?accountid=7398. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HHS awards $139 million to drive adoption of health information technology; 2004. https://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2004/10/13/hhs-awards-139-million-to-drive-adoption-of-health-care-it.aspx. Accessed 27 May 2020.
Turner K, Ferland L. State electronic disease surveillance systems—United States, 2007 and 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(41):1421–3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NBS overview. In: National electronic disease surveillance system (NEDSS) base system. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nbs/overview/index.html. Accessed 21 Jul 2019.
Effler P, Ching-Lee M, Bogard A, Ieong MC, Nekomoto T, Jernigan D. Statewide system of electronic notifiable disease reporting from clinical laboratories: comparing automated reporting with conventional methods. JAMA. 1999;282(19):1845–50.
Overhage JM, Grannis S, McDonald CJ. A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous reporting of notifiable conditions. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(2):344–50. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.092700.
Panackal AA, M’Ikanatha NM, Tsui FC, McMahon J, Wagner MM, Dixon BW, et al. Automatic electronic laboratory-based reporting of notifiable infectious diseases at a large health system. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(7):685–91.
Nguyen TQ, Thorpe L, Makki HA, Mostashari F. Benefits and barriers to electronic laboratory results reporting for notifiable diseases: the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene experience. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(Suppl 1):S142–5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.098996.
Lombardo JS, Buckeridge DL, editors. Disease surveillance: a public health informatics approach. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007.
Doyle TJ, Glynn MK, Groseclose SL. Completeness of notifiable infectious disease reporting in the United States: an analytical literature review. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(9):866–74.
Health Level Seven International. HL7 CDA® R2 implementation guide: public health case report, release 2—US realm—the electronic initial case report (eICR). 2018. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=436. Accessed 21 Jul 2019.
Digital Bridge. Implementation overview. 2019. https://digitalbridge.us/infoex/implementation/. Accessed 1 Jul 2019.
Dixon BE, Taylor D, Duke JD. Integration of FHIR to facilitate electronic case reporting: results from a pilot study. In: Studies in health technology and informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2019;264:940–4. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190362.
Overhage JM. The Indiana health information exchange. In: Dixon BE, editor. Health information exchange: navigating and managing a network of health information systems. 1st ed. Waltham: Academic; 2016. p. 267–79.
Health Level 7. FHIR overview. HL7.org. 2017. https://www.hl7.org/fhir/overview.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2018.
Grannis SJ, Stevens K, Merriwether R. Leveraging health information exchange to support public health situational awareness: the Indiana experience. J Public Health Inform. 2010;2:2.
McFarlane TD, Dixon BE, Gibson PJ. Using electronic health records for public health hypertension surveillance. J Public Health Inform. 2018;10(1):e193. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v10i1.8992.
Newton-Dame R, McVeigh KH, Schreibstein L, Perlman S, Lurie-Moroni E, Jacobson L, et al. Design of the New York City macroscope: innovations in population health surveillance using electronic health records. EGEMS. 2016;4(1):1265. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1265.
Dixon BE, Zou J, Comer KF, Rosenman M, Craig JL, Gibson PJ. Using electronic health record data to improve community health assessment. Front Public Health Serv Sys Res. 2016;5(5):50–6. https://doi.org/10.13023/FPHSSR.0505.08.
Perlman SE, McVeigh KH, Thorpe LE, Jacobson L, Greene CM, Gwynn RC. Innovations in population health surveillance: using electronic health Records for chronic disease surveillance. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(6):853–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.303813.
Gliklich RE, Dryer NA, Leavy MB, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Outcome Sciences, Inc. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208643/.
Dixon BE, Tao G, Wang J, Tu W, Hoover S, Zhang Z, et al. An integrated surveillance system to examine testing, services, and outcomes for sexually transmitted diseases. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:361–5.
Batteiger TA, Dixon BE, Wang J, Zhang Z, Tao G, Tong Y, et al. Where do people go for gonorrhea and chlamydia tests: a cross-sectional view of the Central Indiana population, 2003–2014. Sex Transm Dis. 2019;46(2):132–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000928.
Rahurkar S, McFarlane TD, Wang J, Hoover S, Hammond F, Kean J, et al. Leveraging health information exchange to construct a registry for traumatic brain injury. Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke in Indiana AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2017:1440–9.
McFarlane TD, Love J, Hanley S, Dixon BE, Hammond FM. Increased risk of stroke among hospitalized and younger traumatic brain injury patients. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2020;35(3):E310–E9. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000539. PubMed PMID: 31834059.
Furukawa MF, King J, Patel V, Hsiao CJ, Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. Despite substantial progress in EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings. Health Aff. 2014;33(9):1672–9. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0445.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Non-federal acute care hospital health it adoption and use. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2019. https://dashboard.healthit.gov/datadashboard/documentation/hospital-health-it-adoption-use-data-documentation.php. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Office-based physician health it adoption and use. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2019. https://dashboard.healthit.gov/datadashboard/documentation/physician-health-it-adoption-use-data-documentation.php. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
State of Michigan. Michigan approved to begin implementation of the Michigan health information network. Community Health, Lansing, MI. 2010. https://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/0,5885,7-339--248053--,00.html. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Schmit CD, Wetter SA, Kash BA. Falling short: how state laws can address health information exchange barriers and enablers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(6):635–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx122.
Minnesota Department of Health. Health information exchange oversight. Office of Health IT, St. Paul, MN. https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/ehealth/hie/oversight.html. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Minnesota Department of Health. Minnesota state-certified health information exchange service providers. Office of Health IT, St. Paul, MN. https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/ehealth/hie/certified/index.html. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Lamb E, Satre J, Hurd-Kundeti G, Liscek B, Hall CJ, Pinner RW, et al. Update on progress in electronic reporting of laboratory results to public health agencies—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(12):328–30.
Yeung T. Local health department adoption of electronic health records and health information exchanges and its impact on population health. Int J Med Inform. 2019;128:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.011.
Dixon BE, Jones JF, Grannis SJ. Infection preventionists’ awareness of and engagement in health information exchange to improve public health surveillance. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(9):787–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.022.
Mello MM, Adler-Milstein J, Ding KL, Savage L. Legal barriers to the growth of health information exchange—boulders or pebbles? Milbank Q. 2018;96(1):110–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12313.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Information blocking. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. 2019. https://www.healthit.gov/topic/information-blocking. Accessed 26 Oct 2019.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Trusted exchange framework and common agreement (TEFCA) draft 2. Health and Human Services, U.S., Washington, DC. 2019. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/page/2019-04/FINALTEFCAQTF41719508version.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Are there different types of personal health records (PHRs)? https://www.healthit.gov/faq/are-there-different-types-personal-health-records-phrs. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.
Bower JK, Bollinger CE, Foraker RE, Hood DB, Shoben AB, Lai AM. Active use of electronic health records (EHRs) and personal health records (PHRs) for epidemiologic research: sample representativeness and nonresponse bias in a study of women during pregnancy. EGEMS. 2017;5(1):1263. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1263.
Bonander J, Gates S. Public health in an era of personal health records: opportunities for innovation and new partnerships. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(3):e33. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1346.
King RJ, Garrett N, Kriseman J, Crum M, Rafalski EM, Sweat D, et al. A community health record: improving health through multisector collaboration, information sharing, and technology. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:E122. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160101.
Institute of Medicine. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. In: Roundtable on evidence-based medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
Mullins CD, Wingate LMT, Edwards HA, Tofade T, Wutoh A. Transitioning from learning healthcare systems to learning health care communities. J Comparat Effect Res. 2018;7(6):603–14. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2017-0105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dixon, B.E., Rahurkar, S., Apathy, N.C. (2020). Interoperability and Health Information Exchange for Public Health. In: Magnuson, J., Dixon, B. (eds) Public Health Informatics and Information Systems . Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41215-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41215-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41214-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41215-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)