Language-Focused Feedback and Written Communication Difficulties of Multilingual Students: Improving Teacher Preparedness

  • Nara TsedendambaEmail author
  • Vittoria Grossi
  • Michael Volkov
Part of the Multilingual Education Yearbook book series (MEYB)


A great proportion of Australian university classrooms are now linguistically and culturally diverse. Despite various strategies to improve academic literacy skills of students in these settings, written communication skills, in particular, continue to be a challenge. Provision of effective language-focused feedback is believed to have substantial potential in redressing this situation. The study reported in this chapter involves interactions between a team of Language and Learning Advisers (LLAs), and the teaching team (full-time academics/course leaders and casual marking tutors) of a core first year marketing course during a two phase project at an Australian university that aimed to help its large multilingual student cohort improve their English language development (ELD) and written communication skills. The project introduced a feedback framework to support written communication along with a suggested comments bank developed to support the course’s casual marking tutors to provide feedback on language use and writing. The application of the resources included delivering professional development (PD) sessions for marking tutors on the importance of continuously supporting students’ ELD and written communication using feedback. We use findings from analysis of documents and surveys to foreground the complexities involved in the provision of language-focused feedback in multilingual settings, including issues of tutor preparedness to tackle pedagogic needs of students. We conclude with insights as to how these findings extend to similar contexts where there is a need to prepare casual marking tutors with a view to alleviating issues of written communication skills of linguistically diverse students.


Written communication skill Multilingual students Multilingual setting Language-focused feedback English language development 


  1. Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2018). Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1106–1119. Scholar
  2. Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141. Scholar
  3. Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, S., Bare, L., Bentley, P., Goedegebuure, L., Pugsley, C., & Rance, B. (2016). Contingent academic employment in Australian universities. Retrieved from
  5. Arkoudis, S. (2018). Integrating communication skills through distributed expertise. HERDSA News, 40(1), 3–4. Retrieved from;dn=339690457043707;res=IELHSS.
  6. Arkoudis, S., Baik, C., & Richardson, S. (2012). English language standards in higher education. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  7. Arkoudis, S., & Doughney, L. (2014). Good practice report—English language proficiency. Office for Teaching and Learning, Australian Government. Retrieved from
  8. Baik, C., & Greig, J. (2009). Improving academic outcomes of undergraduate ESL students: The case for discipline-based academic skills programs. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(4), 401–416. Scholar
  9. Bitchener, J. (2012). Written corrective feedback for L2 development: Current knowledge and future research. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 855–860. Scholar
  10. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). What is the problem with feedback? In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  12. Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. Scholar
  13. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. (2014). A language as social semiotic-based approach to teaching and learning in higher education. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Crimmins, G., Nash, G., Oprescu, F., Alla, K., Brock, G., Hickson-Jamieson, B., et al. (2016). Can a systematic assessment moderation process assure the quality and integrity of assessment practice while supporting the professional development of casual academics? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(30), 427–441. Scholar
  16. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (2009). Good practice principles for English language proficiency for international students in Australian universities. Canberra Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from
  17. Doughty, C., & Long, M. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 50–80.Google Scholar
  18. Ene, E., & Kosobucki, V. (2016). Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer. Assessing Writing, 30, 3–20. Scholar
  19. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 3–17. Scholar
  20. Hanks, J. (2017). Exploratory practice in language teaching: Puzzling about principles and practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harper, R. (2013). From principles to practice: Implementing an English language proficiency model at UniSA. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 7(2), A150–A164.Google Scholar
  22. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(81), 81–112. Scholar
  23. Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival strategies and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huber, E., & Harvey, M. (2012). The design of a meta-evaluation study of learning and teaching projects in higher education. In Proceedings of Global TIME -Online Conference on Technology, Innovation, Media & Education (pp. 71–77). Retrieved from
  25. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, C., & Molloy, E. (2018). Building evaluative judgement through the process of feedback. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, & J. Tai (Eds.), Developing evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work (pp. 166–175). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. Scholar
  28. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Maldoni, A. M. (2018). Degrees of deception to degrees of proficiency: Embedding academic literacies into the disciplines. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 12(2), A102–A129.Google Scholar
  30. Meyers, N., & Ryan, Y. (2008). Kift ALTC senior fellowship: Articulating a transition pedagogy. Commentary on First Year Curriculum Case Studies: Staff Development Teaching Council. Retrieved from
  31. Mort, D., & Drury, H. (2012). Supporting student academic literacy in the disciplines using genre-based online pedagogy. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 6(3), A1–A15.Google Scholar
  32. Murray, N. (2010). Conceptualising the English language needs of first year university students. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray, N. (2012). Ten ‘good practice principles’ … then key questions: Considerations in addressing the English language needs of higher education students. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 233–246. Scholar
  34. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Percy, A. (2014). Re-integrating academic development and academic language and learning: A call to reason. Higher Education research & Development, 33(6), 1194–1207. Scholar
  36. Percy, A., Scoufis, S., Parry, A., Goody, M., Hicks, I., Macdonald, K., Martinez et al. (2008). The RED resource, recognition—enhancement—development: The contribution of sessional teachers to Higher Education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.Google Scholar
  37. Perpignan, H. (2003). Exploring the written feedback dialogue: A research, learning and teaching practice. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 259–278. Scholar
  38. Podorova, A. (2016). Academic language feedback toolkit: Making progress with post-entry language skills development. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 10(1), A141–A154.Google Scholar
  39. Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capacity in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. Scholar
  40. Smith, E., & Coombe, K. (2006). Quality and qualms in the marking of university assignments by sessional staff: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 51(1), 45–69. Scholar
  41. Sutton, P., & Gill, W. (2010). Engaging feedback: Meaning, identify and power. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 41(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  42. Thomson, E., & Droga, L. (2012). Effective academic writing: An essay writing workbook for school and university. Sydney: Phoenix Education.Google Scholar
  43. Vance, S., & Crosling, S. (1998). Integrating writing skills into the curriculum of the disciplines: A social constructionist approach. In J. J. F. Forest (Ed.), University teaching: international perspectives (pp. 361–392). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with ‘study skill. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 457–469. Scholar
  45. Wingate, U. (2018). Academic literacies across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Plenary speeches. Language Teaching, 51(3), 349–364. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nara Tsedendamba
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vittoria Grossi
    • 1
  • Michael Volkov
    • 2
  1. 1.Student Academic and Peer Support ServicesDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations