Advertisement

TDT-L0 a Test-Based Method for Assessing Students’ Prior Knowledge in Engineering Graphic Courses

  • Barbara MotyEmail author
  • Gabriele Baronio
  • Domenico Speranza
  • Stefano Filippi
Conference paper
  • 162 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Since students attending basic engineering courses are numerous and show different background regarding high school, experience, skills and attitudes, it has become important for educators to assess the level of their prior knowledge. In Italy, in order to access university engineering courses (BS degree level), students usually must take an entrance test; it assesses their knowledge about basic subjects such as mathematics, physics and chemistry, as well as their logical and linguistic skills. However, this test does not refer to technical subjects, e.g., the technical drawing. The two university research units of Udine and Brescia collaborate in developing the Technical Drawing Test-Level 0 (TDT-L0), a test-based method to assess students’ prior knowledge about basic engineering graphics topics like axonometric and orthographic projections, sectional views, basic dimensioning standards, etc. This paper describes the definition of the test contents - the selection of the questions to ask to the students - as well as the way to analyze the collected information and exploit the results to improve the learning and teaching experience of both students and educators. An adoption of the TDT-L0 at the University of Udine is reported as first validation.

Keywords

Engineering education Technical drawing Prior knowledge assessment Test 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors want to acknowledge Dr. Daniela Barattin for her help and all the students at the University of Udine who participated to the test validation over the years.

References

  1. 1.
    Danos, X., Norman, E.W.L.: The development of a new taxonomy for graphicacy. In: Norman, E., Spendlove, D. (eds.) The Design and Technology Association International Research Conference 2009, pp. 69–84. The Design and Technology Association, Wellesbourne (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Danos, X., Barr, R., Górska, R., Norman, E.: Curriculum planning for the development of graphicacy capability: three case studies from Europe and the USA. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 39(6), 666–684 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.899324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Motyl, B., Baronio, G., Uberti, S., Speranza, D., Filippi, S.: How will change the future engineers’ skills in the Industry 4.0 framework? A questionnaire survey. Proc. Manuf. 11, 1501–1509 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Metraglia, R., Baronio, G., Villa, V.: Issues in learning engineering graphics fundamentals: shall we blame cad? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2015 (DS 80-10), vol. 10, pp. 31–40 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Speranza, D., Baronio, G., Motyl, B., Filippi, S., Villa, V.: Best practices in teaching technical drawing: experiences of collaboration in three Italian Universities. In: Eynard, B., Nigrelli, V., Oliveri, S.M., Peris-Fajarnes, G., Rizzuti, S. (eds.) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing. LNCS, pp. 903–913. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Villa, V., Motyl, B., Paderno, D., Baronio, G.: TDEG based framework and tools for innovation in teaching technical drawing: the example of LaMoo project. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 26(5), 1293–1305 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baronio, G., Motyl, B., Paderno, D.: Technical drawing learning tool-level 2: an interactive self-learning tool for teaching manufacturing dimensioning. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 24(4), 519–528 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baronio, G., Bodini, I., Copeta, A., Dassa, L., Grassi, B., Metraglia, R., Motyl, B., Paderno, D., Uberti, S., Villa, V.: Integrated approach to the innovation of technical drawing teaching methods. In: Cavas-Martínez, F., Eynard, B., Fernández, C.F., Fernández-Pacheco, D., Morer, P., Nigrelli, V. (eds.) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II. LNCS, pp. 705–713. Springer, Heidelberg (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12346-8_68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Metraglia, R., Baronio, G., Villa, V.: Learning levels in technical drawing education: proposal for an assessment grid based on the European Qualifications Framework (EQF). In: Proceedings of ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, vol. 8, pp. 161–172 (2011). SCOPUS code: 2-s2.0-84858825431. ISBN: 978-190467028-5Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Metraglia, R., Villa, V., Baronio, G., Adamini, R.: High school graphics experience influencing the self-efficacy of first-year engineering students in an introductory engineering graphics course. Eng. Des. Graph. J. 79(3), 16–30 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cobos-Moyano, A., Martín-Blas, T., Oñate-Gómez, C.: Evaluating background and prior knowledge: a case study on engineering graphics learning. Comput. Educ. 53(3), 695–700 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nozaki, S.Y., Sorby, S.A., Study, N.E., Steinhauer, H.M., Sadowski, M., Miller, R.: The development of a concept inventory for engineering graphics. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–4 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2016.7757430
  13. 13.
    Croft, F.M., Demel, J.T., Meyers, F.D.: A proposal for a nationally normed engineering graphics concepts and skills test. In: Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper # 1124 Session # 1138 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demel, J.T., Croft, F.M., Meyers, F.D.: Development of nationally normed engineering graphics concepts and skills tests. In: Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 1338 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valentine, R.: An e-assessment for engineering drawing. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E&PDE 2018, pp. 358–362 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.University of BresciaBresciaItaly
  3. 3.University of Cassino and Southern LazioCassinoItaly

Personalised recommendations