Fostering Outcomes; INGENIA Subjects and Digital Prototyping Laboratories

  • M. Luisa Mtz. MunetaEmail author
  • Gregorio Romero Rey
  • Juan de Dios Sanz Bobi
  • Antonio Carretero Díaz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Since the adaptation of the different traditional engineering programs to the degree and master degrees according with the Bologna frame, the number of subjects with CDIO methodology has been increasing. This methodology aims that the student, from the beginning, conceive, design, build and implement improvements and operate the project. In the ETSII, and within the Master of Industrial Engineering, all students (362 students in the course 2018–2019) organized in teams must attend and pass a subject called INGENIA in which they must develop a product/project/service that must comply with a series of constraints. These subjects INGENIA are designed following the CDIO philosophy and has as its fundamental objective the development of outcomes according to the ABET accreditation model, and has been hindered by the limitation in the construction of final prototypes since there were not sufficient means available for its manufacturing.

Since the end of 2018, a digital manufacturing laboratory has been enabled at ETSII, offering students the opportunity to manufacture and build their prototypes with basic materials, but with functionalities similar to those of the designed artifact/project. Although the commissioning of this laboratory is recent, it has already allowed students to develop and validate projects and improve redesign according to user requirements.


Outcomes Skills CDIO ABET Fablab Digital prototyping 



This work has received funding from the call for Educational Innovation Aids and the Improvement of the Quality of Education 2018–19 with reference IE1819.0509 and the support of the ETSII of the UPM.


  1. 1.
    Kjersdam, F., Enemark, S.: The Alborg Experiment: Project Innovation in University Education. Aalborg University Press, Denmark (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, R.M.K.W., Kwan, C.Y.: The use of problem-based learning in medical education. J. Med. Educ. 1(2), 149–157 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lofthouse, R., Cole, S., Thomas, U.: Creativity and enquiry in action: a case study of cross-curricular approaches in teacher education. Tean J. 2(1). Accessed 6 Feb 2020
  4. 4.
    Zhou, C., Kolmos, A.: Interplay between individual creativity and group creativity in problem and project-based learning (PBL) environment in engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 29(4), 866–878 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R.: Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, pp. 1–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crawley, E.: The CDIO syllabus a statement of goals for undergraduate engineering education (2001).
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Hernández Bayo, A., Ortiz Marcos, I., Carretero Diaz, A., del mar de la Fuente Garcia-Soto, M., Lumbreras Martin, J., Martinez Muneta, M.L., Riveira Rico, V., Rodriguez Hernandez, M.: Integral framework to drive engineering education beyond technical skills. Int. J. Eng. Educ. (IJEE) 30(6), 1697–1706 (2014). ISSN 0949-149XGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tanarro, E.C., et al.: Teaching engineering design to a multidisciplinary audience at master’s level: benefits and challenges of the CDIO approach. In: 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, China (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Luisa Mtz. Muneta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gregorio Romero Rey
    • 1
  • Juan de Dios Sanz Bobi
    • 1
  • Antonio Carretero Díaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Grupo de Ingeniería Gráfica, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, ETSIIUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations