Abstract
This chapter describes different methods for imaging the carotid artery in the clinical diagnosis of disease including the workup of potential stroke sources. We review carotid artery imaging by multiple techniques including digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and vessel wall MRI (vwMRI). The interpretation of each technique, advantages, and disadvantages are discussed. Imaging examples of each modality are also provided. This will serve as a primer for the interpretation of currently available diagnostic imaging techniques and will aid in surgical and interventional planning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Croft RJ, Ellam LD, Harrison MJ. Accuracy of carotid angiography in the assessment of atheroma of the internal carotid artery. Lancet. 1980;1:997–1000.
Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, Wartolowska K, Berry E, NHS Research and Development Health Technology Assessment Carotid Stenosis Imaging Group, et al. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367:1503–12.
North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke. 1991;22:711–720.
Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology. 1993;186:316–8.
Manninen AL, Isokangas JM, Karttunen A, Siniluoto T, Nieminen MT. A comparison of radiation exposure between diagnostic cta and dsa examinations of cerebral and cervicocerebral vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:2038–42.
Schminke U, Motsch L, Hilker L, Kessler C. Three-dimensional ultrasound observation of carotid artery plaque ulceration. Stroke. 2000;31:1651–5.
Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Saba L, Cavallo Marincola B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of colour doppler ultrasonography, ct angiography and blood-pool-enhanced mr angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with dsa in 170 patients. Radiol Med. 2012;117:54–71.
Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Fox AJ. Quantification of carotid stenosis on ct angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:13–9.
Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Aviv RI, Fox AJ. Classification of carotid stenosis by millimeter ct angiography measures: effects of prevalence and gender. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1677–83.
Fox AJ, Eliasziw M, Rothwell PM, Schmidt MH, Warlow CP, Barnett HJ. Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2086–94.
Eesa M, Hill MD, Al-Khathaami A, Al-Zawahmah M, Sharma P, Menon BK, et al. Role of ct angiographic plaque morphologic characteristics in addition to stenosis in predicting the symptomatic side in carotid artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1254–60.
Nandalur KR, Baskurt E, Hagspiel KD, Phillips CD, Kramer CM. Calcified carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated less with ischemic symptoms than is noncalcified plaque on mdct. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:295–8.
Menon BK, Singh J, Al-Khataami A, Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Calgary CTA Study Group. The donut sign on ct angiography: an indicator of reversible intraluminal carotid thrombus? Neuroradiology. 2010;52:1055–6.
U-King-Im JM, Fox AJ, Aviv RI, Howard P, Yeung R, Moody AR, et al. Characterization of carotid plaque hemorrhage: a ct angiography and mr intraplaque hemorrhage study. Stroke. 2010;41:1623–9.
Eisenmenger LB, Aldred BW, Kim SE, Stoddard GJ, de Havenon A, Treiman GS, et al. Prediction of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage using adventitial calcification and plaque thickness on cta. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1496–503.
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.
Poggi MM, Suh WW, Saltz L, Konski AA, Mohiuddin M, Herman J, et al. Acr appropriateness criteria on treatment of anal cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:448–56.
Mnyusiwalla A, Aviv RI, Symons SP. Radiation dose from multidetector row ct imaging for acute stroke. Neuroradiology. 2009;51:635–40.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–84.
Kim KP, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Parker L, McHugh K, et al. Development of a database of organ doses for paediatric and young adult ct scans in the United Kingdom. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2012;150:415–26.
Boujan T, Neuberger U, Pfaff J, Nagel S, Herweh C, Bendszus M, et al. Value of contrast-enhanced mra versus time-of-flight mra in acute ischemic stroke mri. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39:1710–6.
McNally JS, McLaughlin MS, Hinckley PJ, Treiman SM, Stoddard GJ, Parker DL, et al. Intraluminal thrombus, intraplaque hemorrhage, plaque thickness, and current smoking optimally predict carotid stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:84–90.
McNally JS, Hinckley PJ, Sakata A, Eisenmenger LB, Kim SE, De Havenon AH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical factors associated with ischemic stroke in patients suspected of cervical artery dissection. Stroke. 2018;49:2337–44.
Daemen MJ, Ferguson MS, Gijsen FJ, Hippe DS, Kooi ME, Demarco K, et al. Carotid plaque fissure: an underestimated source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Atherosclerosis. 2016;254:102–8.
Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, Saam T, Polissar NL, Jarvik GP, et al. Presence of intraplaque hemorrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation. 2005;111:2768–75.
Hosseini AA, Kandiyil N, Macsweeney ST, Altaf N, Auer DP. Carotid plaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging strongly predicts recurrent ischemia and stroke. Ann Neurol. 2013;73:774–84.
Gupta A, Baradaran H, Schweitzer AD, Kamel H, Pandya A, Delgado D, et al. Carotid plaque mri and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44:3071–7.
Saam T, Hetterich H, Hoffmann V, Yuan C, Dichgans M, Poppert H, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1081–91.
Yamada N, Higashi M, Otsubo R, Sakuma T, Oyama N, Tanaka R, et al. Association between signal hyperintensity on t1-weighted mr imaging of carotid plaques and ipsilateral ischemic events. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:287–92.
McNally JS, Yoon HC, Kim SE, Narra KK, McLaughlin MS, Parker DL, et al. Carotid mri detection of intraplaque hemorrhage at 3T and 1.5T. J Neuroimaging. 2015;25:390–6.
Wang J, Bornert P, Zhao H, Hippe DS, Zhao X, Balu N, et al. Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (snap) imaging for carotid atherosclerotic disease evaluation. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:337–45.
Ota H, Yarnykh VL, Ferguson MS, Underhill HR, Demarco JK, Zhu DC, et al. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0-t mr imaging: comparison of the diagnostic performance of three t1-weighted sequences. Radiology. 2010;254:551–63.
Freilinger TM, Schindler A, Schmidt C, Grimm J, Cyran C, Schwarz F, et al. Prevalence of nonstenosing, complicated atherosclerotic plaques in cryptogenic stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2012;5:397–405.
Xu D, Hippe DS, Underhill HR, Oikawa-Wakayama M, Dong L, Yamada K, et al. Prediction of high-risk plaque development and plaque progression with the carotid atherosclerosis score. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2014;7:366–73.
Ota H, Yu W, Underhill HR, Oikawa M, Dong L, Zhao X, et al. Hemorrhage and large lipid-rich necrotic cores are independently associated with thin or ruptured fibrous caps: an in vivo 3t mri study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:1696–701.
Trivedi RA, Jean-Marie U, Graves MJ, Horsley J, Goddard M, Kirkpatrick PJ, et al. Mri-derived measurements of fibrous-cap and lipid-core thickness: the potential for identifying vulnerable carotid plaques in vivo. Neuroradiology. 2004;46:738–43.
Cai J, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Saam T, Chu B, et al. In vivo quantitative measurement of intact fibrous cap and lipid-rich necrotic core size in atherosclerotic carotid plaque: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Circulation. 2005;112:3437–44.
Wasserman BA, Smith WI, Trout HH 3rd, Cannon RO 3rd, Balaban RS, Arai AE. Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique mr imaging initial results. Radiology. 2002;223:566–73.
Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, Davis JW, et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation. 2002;105:181–5.
Kerwin WS, Oikawa M, Yuan C, Jarvik GP, Hatsukami TS. Mr imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:507–14.
Kerwin WS, O’Brien KD, Ferguson MS, Polissar N, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced mr imaging study. Radiology. 2006;241:459–68.
Mendes J, Parker DL, McNally S, DiBella E, Bolster BD Jr, Treiman GS. Three-dimensional dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the carotid artery with direct arterial input function measurement. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:816–22.
Sun J, Song Y, Chen H, Kerwin WS, Hippe DS, Dong L, et al. Adventitial perfusion and intraplaque hemorrhage: a dynamic contrast-enhanced mri study in the carotid artery. Stroke. 2013;44:1031–6.
Dong L, Kerwin WS, Chen H, Chu B, Underhill HR, Neradilek MB, et al. Carotid artery atherosclerosis: effect of intensive lipid therapy on the vasa vasorum–evaluation by using dynamic contrast-enhanced mr imaging. Radiology. 2011;260:224–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLaughlin, M., McNally, J.S. (2020). Imaging of the Carotid Artery. In: Park, M., Kalani, M., de Havenon, A., McNally, J. (eds) Carotid Artery Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41138-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41138-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41137-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41138-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)