Perspectiveness and Discoursiveness

  • Tomas KačerauskasEmail author
  • Algis Mickūnas
Part of the Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress book series (NAHP, volume 14)


Communication and empirical “principles”. Communication with historical “partners”. “Multi-perspectivity”. Inter cultural communication. Visuality, audiality, and tactility. Deconstruction as communication. Communication based on physiological data. Discourse as power.


  1. Annus, Epp. 2012. The problem of Soviet colonialism in the Baltics. Journal of Baltic Studies 43 (1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, Jean. 2016. Symbolic Exchange and Death. Translated by I.H. Grant. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Benjamin, Walter. 1969. Illuminations. Translated by H. Zohn. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2011. Sur la Television.
  6. Buber, Martin. 2000. I and Thou. Translated by R.G. Smith. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. Routledge: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Carrilho, Manuel M. 1996. Rhetoric and perspectivism. Revue Internationale de Philosophy 28 (3): 59–75.Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques. 1992. From Shibboleth: For Paul Celan. Acts of Literature, 370–413. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, Jacques. 1997. Of Grammatology. Translated by G.Ch. Spivak. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against Method. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Flusser, Vilém. 2007. „Vorlesungen zur Kommunikologie.“ In Kommunikologie, 233–235. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, Michel. 1971. L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, Michel. 1972. Madness and Civilization; a History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  16. Görner, Rüdiger. 1995. The poetics of historical perspectivism. Modern Language Review 90: 234–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greimas, Algirdas J. 1987a. De l’imperfection. Périgueux: Fanlac.Google Scholar
  18. Greimas, Algirdas J. 1987b. On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. Translated by P.J. Perron and F.H. Collins. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Heidegger, Martin. 1972. Nietzsche’s Wort “Gott ist tot.” In M. Heidegger. Holzwege, 193–247. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time. Translated by J. Stambough. New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  21. Hume, David. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated by D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Irigaray, Luce. 1985. This Sex Which Is not One. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jung, Carl G. 1991. The archetypes and the collective unconscious. In Collected Works of C. G. Jung. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kačerauskas, Tomas. 2006. Filosofinė poetika [Philosophical Poetics]. Vilnius: Versus aureus.Google Scholar
  26. Kačerauskas, Tomas. 2008. Tikrovė ir kūryba: kultūros fenomenologijos metmenys [Reality and Creation: Sketches of Cultural Phenomenology]. Vilnius: Technika.Google Scholar
  27. Kačerauskas, Tomas. 2011. Individas istorinėje bendrijoje: kultūrinės regionalistikos apmatai [An Individual in Historical Community: Sketches of Cultural Regionalistics]. Vilnius: Technika.Google Scholar
  28. Kačerauskas, Tomas, and Tautvydas Vėželis. 2016. Šiapusybės regionai: 50 Heideggerio filosofijos klausimų [Regions of Dasein: 50 Questions About Heidegger’s Philosophy]. Vilnius: Technika.Google Scholar
  29. Kant, Immanuel. 1999. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer and A.W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kossler, Matthias. 1995. Philosophy of perspectivism: Truth and perspective in Kant, Hegel and Nietzsche. Kant-Studien 86 (4): 467–470.Google Scholar
  31. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lazarsfeld, Paul F. 1972. Qualitative Analysis: Historical and Critical Essays. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  33. Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by A. Lingis. Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Locke, John. 1964. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  35. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Marcuse, Herbert. 1991. One-dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  37. McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by C. Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. Eye and Mind. Translated by C. Dallery. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by A. Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mickunas, Algis, and David Stewart. 1990. Exploring Phenomenology. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mitchell, William J.T. 1994. Picture Theory. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1998. On the Genealogy of Morality. Translated by C. Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2002. Beyond Good and Evil. Translated by J. Norman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Ozmon, Howard A., and Samuel M. Craver. 2008. Philosophical Foundations of Education. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  46. Pearce, Jacob V. 2015. The potential of perspectivism for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5): 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peters, John D. 1999. Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Plato. 1990. Sophist. Translated by W.S. Cobb. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  49. Popper, K.R. 1989. Logik der Forschung. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
  50. Ramos, Alcida R. 2015. The politics of perspectivism. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schenck, David. 1985. Merleau-Ponty on perspectivism, with references to Nietzsche. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (2): 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1969. The World as Will and Representation. Translated by R.B. Haldane and J. Kemp. New York: Dover Pub.Google Scholar
  53. Thomson, Walter J. 1994. Perspectivism—Aquinas and Nietzsche on intellect and will. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 68 (4): 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1990. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. In Wittgenstein’s Werkausgabe. Bd. 1. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy and Cultural StudiesVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityVilniusLithuania
  2. 2.Philosophy and Cultural StudiesVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations