Advertisement

Masculinities, Intersectionality and Transnational Memories

  • Pauline StoltzEmail author
Chapter
  • 17 Downloads
Part of the Memory Politics and Transitional Justice book series (MPTJ)

Abstract

The transnational dynamics of memories of violence are an important focus if we want to understand the constraints surrounding gendered resistance to denials of responsibility. I argue that it is fruitful to combine postcolonial and intersectional perspectives with the concept of hegemonic masculinities and with a methodological intervention into narratives of transnational memories in order to take seriously the politics of location, which is important when we study the constraints that affect resistance to denials. I show how such transnational dynamics influence the opportunities for male postcolonial migrants from different generations to resist hegemonic projects of masculinity, Eurocentrism and racism as well as silences about possible historical injustices by using examples from the Dutch novel The Interpreter from Java [De tolk van Java] by Alfred Birney (2016).

Keywords

Masculinities Hegemonic masculinity Intersectionality Transnational memories Postcolonialism 

References

  1. Assmann, A. (2014). Transnational memories. European Review, 22(4), 546–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beasley, C. (2008). Rethinking hegemonic masculinity in a globalizing world. Men and Masculinities, 11(1), 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beasley, C. (2014). Rethinking hegemonic masculinity in transnational context. In J. Hearn, M. Blagojević, & K. Harrison (Eds.), Rethinking transnational men: Beyond, between and within nations (pp. 29–44). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, K., & Ní Aoláin, F. (2015). Through the looking glass: Transitional justice futures through the lens of nationalism, feminism and transformative change. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 9(1), 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cahn, N., & Ní Aoláin, F. D. (2010). Gender, masculinities and transition in conflicted societies. New England Law Review, 44(1), 101–123.Google Scholar
  6. Chakrabarty, D. (2008). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chisholm, A., & Tidy, J. (2017). Beyond the hegemonic in the study of militaries, masculinities, and war. Critical Military Studies, 3(2), 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Intersectionality: Theorizing power, empowering theory. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, A.-D., & Qvotrup Jensen, S. (2014). Combining hegemonic masculinity and intersectionality. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(1), 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Connell, R. W. (1983). Men’s bodies. In R. W. Connell, Which way is up? (pp. 17–32). Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, R. W. (2014). Margin becoming centre: For a world-centred rethinking of masculinities. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(4), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connell, R. W. (2016). Masculinities in global perspectives: Hegemony, contestation, and changing structures of power. Theory and Society, 45(4), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cribb, R. (2010). Digital atlas of indonesian history. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  17. De Cesari, C., & Rigney, A. (2014). Introduction. In C. de Cesari & A. Rigney (Eds.), Transnational memory: Circulation, articulation, scales. Berlin: De Gruyter Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donaldson, M., Hibbins, R., Howson, R., & Pease, B. (Eds.). (2009). Migrant men: Critical studies of masculinities and the migration experience. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Eriksson Baaz, M., & Stern, M. (2010). Understanding and addressing conflict-related sexual violence: Lessons learned from the Democratic Republic of Congo (Nordic Africa Institute Policy Notes, 2010/3). Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Eriksson Baaz, M., & Stern, M. (2014). Understanding sexual violence in conflict and post-conflict settings. In M. Evans, C. Hemmings, & M. Henry (Eds.), The Sage handbook of feminist theory (pp. 585–605). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erll, A. (2011). Travelling memory. Parallax, 17(4), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freriks, K. (2015). Echo’s van Indië [Echoes from the Indies]. Amsterdam: Atheneum—Polak & Van Gennep.Google Scholar
  23. Guha, R. (1998). Dominance without hegemony: History and power in colonial India. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hamber, B. (2016). There is a crack in everything: Problematising masculinities, peacebuilding and transitional justice. Human Rights Review, 17(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hancock, A.-M. (2016). ‘We are named by others and we are named by ourselves’: Social constructivism and intersectionality-like thinking. In A.-M. Hancock, Intersectionality: An intellectual history (pp. 1–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
  26. Hearn, J. (2015). Men of the world: Genders, globalizations, transnational times. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hearn, J., Blagojević, M., & Harrison, K. (Eds.). (2014). Rethinking transnational men: Beyond, between and within nations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Hill Collins, P. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishna, S. (2009). Globalization and postcolonialism: Hegemony and resistance in the twenty-first century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Limpach, R. (2016). De brandende kampongs van Generaal Spoor [The burning kampongs of General Spoor]. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  31. Messerschmidt, J. (2015). Masculinities in the making. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  32. Messerschmidt, J. W. (2019). The salience of ‘hegemonic masculinity’. Men and Masculinities, 22(1), 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicholls, W., Miller, B., & Beaumont, J. (2013). Introduction: Conceptualizing the spatialities of social movements. In W. Nicholls, B. Miller, & J. Beaumont (Eds.), Spaces of contention: Spatialities and social movements (pp. 1–23). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Oostindie, G. (2015). Soldaat in Indonesïe: 1945–1950 [Soldier in Indonesia: 1945–1950]. Amsterdam: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  35. Radstone, S. (2011). What place is this? Transcultural memory and the locations of memory studies. Parallax, 17(4), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rothberg, M. (2014a). Multidirectional memory in migratory settings: The case of post-Holocaust Germany. In C. de Cesari & A. Rigney (Eds.), Transnational memory: Circulation, articulation, scales (pp. 123–146). Berlin: De Gruyter Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rothberg, M. (2014b). Afterword: Locating transnational memory. European Review, 22(4), 652–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scagliola, S. (2012). Cleo’s ‘unfinished business’: Coming to terms with Dutch war crimes in Indonesia’s war of independence. Journal of Genocide Research, 14(3–4), 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sierp, A., & Wüstenberg, J. (2015). Linking the local and the transnational: Rethinking memory politics in Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 23(3), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoltz, P. (2016). Postkoloniale narrativer [Postcolonial narratives]. In I. Glavind Bo, A.-D. Christensen, & T. Lund Thomsen (Eds.), Narrativ forskning—tilgange og metoder [Narrative research—Approaches and methods] (pp. 293–312). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  43. Stoltz, P. (2019). Masculinities, postcolonialism and transnational memories of violent conflicts. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 14(3), 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Törnquist-Plewa, B. (2018). The transnational dynamics of local remembrance: The Jewish past in a former shtetl in Poland. Memory Studies, 11(3), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van den Herik, L. (2012). Addressing ‘colonial crimes’ through reparations? Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10, 693–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wekker, G. (2016). White innocence: Paradoxes of colonialism and race. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wojnicka, K., & Pustułka, P. (2019). Research on men, masculinities and migration: Past, present and future. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 14(2), 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woodward, R., & Duncanson, C. (Eds.). (2017). The Palgrave international handbook of gender and the military. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Wüstenberg, J. (2019). Locating transnational memory. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 32(4), 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Novels

  1. Birney, A. (2016). De tolk van Java [The interpreter from Java]. Amsterdam: De Geus.Google Scholar
  2. Bloem, M. (1983). Geen gewoon Indisch meisje [No ordinary Indisch girl]. Amsterdam: Maarten Muntinga.Google Scholar
  3. Couperus, L. (1900/1994). De stille kracht [The silent power]. Uitgeverij Contact.Google Scholar
  4. Dermoût, M. (1955/1980). De tienduizend dingen [The ten thousand things]. Amsterdam: Querido.Google Scholar
  5. du Perron, E. (1935). Het land van herkomst [The country of origin]. Amsterdam: G.A. van Oorschot.Google Scholar
  6. Gomes, P. (1975). Sudah, laat maar [Sudah, never mind]. Em. Querido’s Uitgeverij (first print); In Gomes, P. (2004). Tropenkind [Tropical child]. Den Haag: Van Stockum (second, revised print).Google Scholar
  7. Haasse, H. (1948). Oeroeg. Amsterdam: Querido.Google Scholar
  8. Haasse, H. (1992). De heren van de thee [The gentlemen of the tea trade]. Amsterdam: Querido.Google Scholar
  9. Multatuli. (1860/1958). Max Havelaar of de koffieveilingen der Nederlandsche Handel-Maatschappij [Max Havelaar or the coffee auctions of the Nederlandsche Handel-Maatschappij]. Antwerpen: Ontwikkelingen.Google Scholar
  10. Springer, F. (1993). Bandoeng-Bandung. Amsterdam: Querido.Google Scholar
  11. van Dis, A. (1994). Indische duinen [Indisch dunes]. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.Google Scholar
  12. van Dis, A. (2014). Ik kom terug [I will return]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Augustus.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics and SocietyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations