An Empirical Study of Interaction in Business Relationships

  • Antonella La RoccaEmail author


In this chapter, we present and discuss the results of an empirical field study of interaction in 32 business relationships and we use data collected before and after the customer-salespeople interaction episode. We report the results concerning two hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: Different customers attribute different identities to the same supplier; and Hypothesis 2: The identity attributed to a counterpart in a business relationship changes from interaction to interaction. We start with descriptive quantitative analysis testing Hypothesis 1 and then analyse the data concerning the change in the reciprocally attributed identities of both customers and supplier testing Hypothesis 2. Examining how perceptions of supplier quality (expressed by the customers), customer quality (expressed by the supplier agents) and mutual perceptions of the organisation’s personality differ and have changed, we find support for both hypotheses. We conclude by commenting on the inferences that can be made of the data analysis and reflecting on the methodology and limitations of the study.


  1. Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. D’Astous, A., & Boujbel, L. (2007). Positioning countries on personality dimensions: Scale development process and implications for country marketing. Journal of Business Research, 60(3), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Whittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). Old Tappan, NJ: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1994). Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 201–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Slaughter, J. E., Mohr, D. C., Zickar, M. J., & Highhouse, S. (2004). Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rennes School of BusinessRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations