Advertisement

Perspectives on Market: Business Markets as Networks

  • Antonella La RoccaEmail author
Chapter
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, we look at how the idea of what a market is and how it works have been treated in disciplines and how these ideas relate to the properties of business markets as they emerged in past research. We focus on the differences in the conceptualisation of markets in economics and in the disciplines that approach markets from an empirical perspective (e.g., sociology or marketing). Discussing the different ideas about what is a market and how it is formed and works, we start with ideas from economics, since it is the discipline with the most elaborate market concept. A common critique, however, has been that economists are more concerned with a normative idea of market rather than with market institutions and practices. This is also the reason why we turn to other disciplines (sociology, anthropology, political science and management) that are concerned with the market as an institution, and discuss the contributions that emphasise the features of market practices that have been neglected in the conception of market that prevails in economics. The purpose of this chapter is to examine how the relationship perspective affects the idea and conceptualisation of the market, and therefore we conclude the chapter by discussing the idea of the ‘market as network’, which tends to summarise the relational perspective on markets and market dynamics.

References

  1. Abolafia, M. Y. (1996). Making markets: Opportunism and restraint on Wall Street. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alderson, W. (1954). Problem solving and marketing science. The Charles Coolidge Parlin Memorial Lecture. Retrieved from https://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/problem_solving_and_marketing_science.pdf.
  3. Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing behavior and executive action. A functionalist approach to marketing theory. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic marketing behavior: A functionalist theory of marketing. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J., Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Axelsson, B. (1992). Corporate strategy models and networks—Diverging perspectives. In B. Axelsson & G. Easton (Eds.), Industrial networks—A new view of reality (pp. 84–204). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Baraldi, E., Gressetvold, E., & Harrison, D. (2012). Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengtson, A., & Håkansson, H. (2008). An interactive view of innovations: Adopting a new timber solution in an old concrete context. The IMP Journal, 2(3), 19–35.Google Scholar
  10. Brennan, R., Turnbull, P., & Wilson, D. (2003). Dyadic adaptation in business-to-business markets. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1636–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Buttle, F., & Makalan, S. (2015). Customer relationship management. Oxon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Callon, M. (1998). The laws of the markets. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Cantù, C., Corsaro, D., & Snehota, I. (2012). Role of actors in combining resources into complex solutions. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cespedes, F. V. (1995). Managing marketing linkages: Text, cases, and readings. Caddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Day, G. S. (2000, Winter). Managing Market Relationships. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007). The sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ford, D. (1980). The development of buyer-seller relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 14(5/6), 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2003). Managing business relationships. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Ford, D., & Håkansson, H. (2013). Competition in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freytag, P. V., Gadde, L.-E., & Harrison, D. (2017). Interdependences—Blessing and curses. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No Business is an island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 235–252). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gadde, L.-E., & Håkansson, H. (1993). Professional purchasing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Gadde, L.-E., & Håkansson, H. (2008). Business relationships and resource combining. IMP Journal, 2(1), 31–45.Google Scholar
  26. Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Persson, G. (2010). Supply network strategies. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Gadde, L.-E., & Mattsson, L.-G. (1987). Stability and change in network relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 4(1), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gadde, L.-E., & Snehota, I. (2019). What does it take to make the most of supplier relationships? Industrial Marketing Management.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geiger, S., & Finch, J. (2010). Networks of mind and networks of organizations: The map metaphor in business network research. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grönroos, C. (2007). Service management and marketing. Customer management in service competition. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic. A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grönroos, C., & Voima, F. P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gummesson, E. (2012). Total relationship marketing (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Håkansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods: An interaction approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Håkansson, H., & Ford, D. (2016). Duels, duets and the dynamics of interaction. Strategic Direction, 32(7), 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Håkansson, H., Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Snehota, I., & Waluszewski, A. (2009). Business in networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationship in business networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2006). No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22(3), 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2017). No business is an island: Making sense of the interactive business world. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Håkansson, H., & Waluszewski, A. (2002). Co-evolution in technological development—The role of friction. Synergia, 58, 171–190.Google Scholar
  43. Hallén, L., Johanson, J., & Seyed-Mohamed, N. (1991). Interfirm adaptation in business relationships. Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
  45. Hayek, F. A. (1975). The pretence of knowledge. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 77(4), 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Henneberg, S. C., Mouzas, S., & Naudé, P. (2006). Network pictures: Concepts and representations. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3/4), 408–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hodgson, G. M. (1988). Economics and institutions. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoholm, T., La Rocca, A., & Aanestad, M. (Eds.). (2018). Controversies in health care innovations. Service, technology and organization. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  49. Hoholm, T., & Olsen, P. I. (2012). The contrary forces of innovation: A conceptual model for studying networked innovation processes. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(2), 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Holmen, E., & Pedersen, A. (2003). Strategizing through analyzing and influencing the network horizon. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(5), 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hopkinson, G. C. (2015). Network graffiti: Interaction as sensemaking. Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Huang, Y., & Wilkinson, I. F. (2013). The dynamics and evolution of trust in business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jevons, W. S. (1871). The theory of political economy. London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (2011). Markets as networks: Implications for strategy-making. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(4), 484–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Johnsen, R. E., & Ford, D. (2006). Interaction capability development of smaller suppliers in relationships with larger customers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(8), 1002–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kjellberg, H., Azimont, F., & Reid, E. (2015). Market innovation processes: Balancing stability and change. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. La Rocca, A., Moscatelli, P., Perna, A., & Snehota, I. (2016). Customer involvement in new product development in B2B: The role of sales. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. La Rocca, A., Perna, A., Snehota, I., & Ciabuschi, F. (2019). The role of supplier relationships in the development of new ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2019). L’anatomia dei mercati business-to-business. In G. L. Gregori & A. Perna (Eds.), BtoB marketing. Il business marketing tra teoria e managerialita (pp. 25–49). Milano: Egea.Google Scholar
  60. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  61. Lindblom, C. E. (2001). The market system: What it is, how it works, and what to make of it. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Loasby, B. J. (2000). Market institutions and economic evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(3), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Loasby, B. J. (2015). Ronald Coase’s theory of the firm and the scope of economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  66. Mankiw, N. G., & Taylor, M. P. (2017). Economics (4th ed.). Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning. Google Scholar
  67. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Mattsson, L. G. (1987). Management of strategic change in a “markets-as-networks” perspective. In A. Pettigrew (Ed.), The management of strategic change. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  69. Mattsson, L. G. (1997). “Relationship marketing” and the “markets-as-networks approach”—A comparative analysis of two evolving streams of research. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(5), 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McLoughlin, D., & Horan, C. (2002). Markets-as-networks: Notes on a unique understanding. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Metcalfe, J. S. (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (2000). Relationship marketing theory: Its roots and directions. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1–3), 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mouzas, S., Henneberg, S., & Naudé, P. (2007). Trust and reliance in business relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9–10), 1016–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Munksgaard, K., Olsen, P. I., & Prenkert, F. (2017). Boundaries of business actors and networks—Theoretical and methodological reflections. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No Business is an island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 213–233). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. North, D. (1977). Markets and other allocations systems in history. Journal of European Economic History, 6(3), 703–716.Google Scholar
  76. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. North, D. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70, 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., Dant, R. P., & Grewal, D. (2013). Relationship velocity: Toward a theory of relationship dynamics. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Payne, A., Christopher, M., Clark, M., & Peck, H. (1995). Relationship marketing for competitive advantage: Winning and keeping customers. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  81. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Perna, A., & Baraldi, E. (2014). CRM systems in industrial companies: Intra- and inter-organizational effects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Porac, J., Thomas, H., Wilson, F., & Kanfer, A. (1995). Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Powell, W., & Di Maggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Richardson, G. B. (1960). Information and investment: A study in the working of the competitive economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Rosa, J. A., Porac, J. F., Runser-Spanjol, J., & Saxon, M. S. (1999). Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. Journal of Marketing, 63, 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Snehota, I. (2014). Interdependences in business markets—Implications for management practice and research. Journal of Business Market Management, 7(1), 280–283.Google Scholar
  89. Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review, 67, 76–90.Google Scholar
  90. Tirole, J. (1989). Industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  91. Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking customer solutions: From product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tunisini, A. (Ed.). (2017). Marketing B2B. Capire e gestire le reti e le relazioni tra imprese. Milano: Hoepli.Google Scholar
  93. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Veblen, T. (1898). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Reprinted in The place of science in modern civilization (New York, 1919).Google Scholar
  95. Venkatesh, A. (1999). Postmodernism perspectives for macromarketing: An inquiry into the global information and sign economy. Journal of Macromarketing, 19(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Walras, L. (1874). Eléments d’économie politique pure: Ou théorie de la richesse sociale. Lausanne, Corbaz. English translations of the definitive edition by Jaffe, W. (1954). Elements of pure economics. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  97. Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  98. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  99. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. White, H. C. (1981). Where do market come from? American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wilkinson, I. (2008). Business relating business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Young, L. (2006). Trust: Looking forward and back. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 21(7), 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rennes School of BusinessRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations