Advertisement

Exploring the Role of Actors in the Formation of Market Relationships

  • Antonella La RoccaEmail author
Chapter
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter is an overview of the theoretical underpinnings of the volume, the research question and the study approach. In the first part we discuss the reasons for addressing the issue of business relationships and interaction. The discussion of the reasons why, in business markets, relationships matter both for the development of the single businesses and of the business network (market) at large engenders addressing the question of how do these relationships form, emerge and develop? Past research on the dynamics of business relationships shows that interaction is a critical process in the formation of business relationships. The way actors behave, act and react in their interactions depends on how they perceive and interpret each other’s features and characteristics. Consequently, the research question that permeates the volume is: how do actors attribute identities to counterparts with whom they interact in business relationships? We develop two propositions that constitute the file rouge of the book: (1) attributed identity tends to be relationship specific; and (2) identities are always emergent and change from interaction to interaction. The chapter ends with presenting how we explored empirically these two propositions by following a company’s sales force and participating in meetings with 32 customers and interviewing sales representatives and representatives of the customer organisations before and after the meetings.

References

  1. Aaboen, L., La Rocca, A., Lind, F., Perna, A., & Shih, T. (Eds.) (2017). Starting-up in business networks: Why relationships matter in entrepreneurship. Palgrave.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamsen, M., Havenvid, I. M., & La Rocca, A. (2017). Researching the interactive business landscape. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 253–273). Emerald: Bingley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J., Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Benassi, M. (1995). Governance factors in a network process approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(3), 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggemann, S., & Buttle, F. (2007). The effects of previous episodes in business-to-business interaction. Management Research News, 30(6), 396–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Bowman, D., & Narayandas, D. (2004). Linking customer management effort to customer profitability in business markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, A. D., Colville, I., & Pye, A. (2015). Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cespedes, F. V. (1995). Managing marketing linkages: Text, cases, and readings. Caddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(April), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easton, G. (1992). Industrial networks: A review. In B. Axelsson & G. Easton (Eds.), Industrial Networks. A New View of Reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Fiocca, R. (1980). L’analisi del portafoglio clienti nel marketing industriale. In R. Fiocca (Ed.), Il marketing dei beni industriali. Giuffrè: Milano.Google Scholar
  15. Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2003). Managing business relationships. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Ford, D., & Håkansson, H. (2006). The idea of interaction. IMP Journal, 1(1), 4–27.Google Scholar
  17. Ford, D., Mattsson, L.-E., & Snehota, I. (2017). Management in the interactive business world. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 27–46). Emerald: Bingley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Persson, G. (2010). Supply network strategies. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Gadde, L.-E., & Mattsson, L.-G. (1987). Stability and change in network relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 4(1), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geiger, S., & Finch, J. H. (2009). Industrial sales people as market actors. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(6), 608–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  23. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
  24. Grönroos, C. (2007). In search of a new logic for marketing: Foundations of contemporary theory. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guercini, S., La Rocca, A., Runfola, A., & Snehota, I. (2014). Interaction behaviors in business relationships and heuristics: Issues for management and research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), 929–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guercini, S., La Rocca, A., Runfola, A., & Snehota, I. (2015). Heuristics in customer-supplier interaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guercini, S., & Runfola, A. (2014). Actors’ roles in interaction and innovation in local systems: A conceptual taxonomy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(3/4), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Håkansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods: An interaction approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  30. Håkansson, H., Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Snehota, I., & Waluszewski, A. (2009). Business in networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationship in business networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2017). No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world. Emerald.Google Scholar
  33. Håkansson, H., & Waluszewski, A. (2013). A never ending story—Interaction patterns and economic development. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 42(3), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halinen, A., Salmi, A., & Havila, V. (1999). From dyadic change to changing business network: An analytical framework. Journal of Management Studies, 36(6), 779–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hallén, L., Johanson, J., & Sayed-Mohamed, N. (1991). Interfirm adaptations in business relationships. Journal of Marketing, 55, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hogan, J. E., Lemon, K. N., & Rust, R. T. (2002). Customer Equity Management: Charting New Directions for the Future of Marketing. Journal of Service Research, 5(1), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holmlund, M. (2004). Analyzing business relationships and distinguishing different interaction levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(4), 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hutt, M. D., & Speh, T. W. (2013). Business marketing management B2B. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  39. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (2011). Markets as networks: Implications for strategy-making. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(4), 484–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. La Rocca, A. (2013). Approaching (inter-) actors in the business landscape. The IMP Journal, 7(3), 171–179.Google Scholar
  42. La Rocca, A., Hoholm, T., & Mørk, B. E. (2017). Practice theory and the study of interaction in business relationships—Some methodological implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. La Rocca, A., Moscatelli, P., Perna, A., & Snehota, I. (2016). Customer involvement in new product development in B2B: The role of sales. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2011). Knowledge in use when actors interact in business relationships. The IMP Journal, 5(2), 79–93.Google Scholar
  45. La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2014). Relating in business networks: Innovation in practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2016). Corporate associations in B2B: Coping with multiple relationship-specific identities. The IMP Journal, 10(1), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lindgren, A., & Wynstra, F. (2005). Value in business markets: What do we know? Where are we going? Industrial Marketing Management, 34(7), 732–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mattsson, L. G., Corsaro, D., & Ramos, C. (2015). Sense-making in business markets–The interplay between cognition, action and outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mulhern, F. J. (1999). Customer profitability analysis: Measurement, concentration, and research directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Munksgaard, K., Olsen, P. I., & Prenkert, F. (2017). Boundaries of business actors and networks—Theoretical and methodological reflections. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 213–233). Emerald: Bingley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Newell, W. J. (2015). How buyer roles and critical times affect buyer-supplier exchange episodes. IMP Journal, 11(3), 376–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  53. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70, 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., Dant, R. P., & Grewal, D. (2013). Relationship velocity: Toward a theory of relationship dynamics. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1994). Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 201–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pfeifer, P. E., Haskins, M. E., & Conroy, R. M. (2005). Customer lifetime value, customer profitability, and the treatment of acquisition spending. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(1), 11–25.Google Scholar
  57. Ramani, G., & Kumar, V. (2008). Interaction orientation and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schurr, P. H., Hedaa, L., & Geersbro, J. (2008). Interaction episodes as engines of relationship change. Journal of Business Research, 61(8), 877–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (2011). The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Slaughter, J. E., Mohr, D. C., Zickar, M. J., & Highhouse, S. (2004). Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  63. Tuli, K. R., Kohli, A. K., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (2007). Rethinking customer solutions: From product bundles to relational processes. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ulaga, W., & Eggert, A. (2006). Value-based differentiation in business relationships: Gaining and sustaining key supplier status. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waluszewski, A., Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2017). Researching the interactive business world; interplay of research object, methodology and theory. In H. Håkansson & I. Snehota (Eds.), No business is an Island: Making sense of the interactive business world (pp. 195–212). Emerald: Bingley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waluszewski, A., Snehota, I., & La Rocca, A. (2019). What remains to be discovered? Manifesto for researching the interactive business world. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(1), 232–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wayland, R. E., & Cole, P. M. (1997). Customer connections: New strategies for growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  70. Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  71. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  73. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rennes School of BusinessRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations