Development of Research-Based RRSDI Learning Model for Telecommunication Engineering Education

  • Nattapong IntarawisetEmail author
  • Sivadol Noulnoppadol
  • Rattapon Jeenawong
  • Somsak Akatimagool
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1134)


The paper presents the development of an instructional package using a research-based model for learning in telecommunication engineering. The model includes 5 steps (requirement, reviewing, solution, discussion and improvement) has been tested on a student group and has been assessed by several course instructors. The developed RRSDI learning model can encourage learners to have more participation in learning activities and highly learning achievement. The active RRSDI learning model can promote students to research and develop novel knowledge and to solve the problems by themselves using research results and methodology. The research results of the developed RRSDI learning model was assessed by five experts and then was implemented on 15 undergraduate students of microwave engineering course. The quality of the developed RRSDI learning model was appropriate (mean = 4.10, S.D. = 0.22) and was efficient with regards to Meguigans’ theory. The student’s satisfaction for the developed RRSDI learning model was at a high level. Moreover, the research results can be applied in order to create an effective innovation for learning and teaching of higher education.


Research-based learning RRSDI learning model Telecommunication engineering education 



This research has been granted financial support by Graduate College and King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok. Also, we would like to acknowledge Dr. Thanawit Bunsit for proofreading and for some comments on this paper.


  1. 1.
    Gupta, K.C., Itoh, T., Oliner, A.A.: Microwave and RF education-past, present, and future. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 50(3), 1006–1014 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta, T., Prachi, A.S.M., Akhtar, M.J., Srivastava, K.V.: Development of the virtual lab module for understanding the concepts of electric and magnetic field patterns in rectangular waveguides and cavities. Int. J. Online Eng. 8(3), 12–21 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou, X.: Reform and research on experimental teaching for high frequency electronic circuit. In: 2010 International Conference on E-Health Networking Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (EDT), Shenzhen, pp. 168–170 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, H., He, M., Pan, Y., Yang, S.: The status of research teaching in China. In: 2010 International Conference on Education and Management Technology, Cairo, pp. 604–607 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pejcinovic, B., Campbell, R.L.: Active learning, hardware projects and reverse instruction in microwave/RF education. In: 2013 European Radar Conference, Nuremberg, pp. 259–262 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carstensen, A.-K., Bernhard, J.: Design science research – a powerful tool for improving methods in engineering education research. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 44(1–2), 85–102 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gubsky, D.S., Zemlyakov, V.V., Mamay, I.V.: The microwave virtual laboratory for RF engineers’ education. In: 10th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference (EuMIC), Paris, pp. 460–463 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Augmenting mathematics courses by project-based learning. In: 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Florence, pp. 124–127 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richardson, K.J., Fernandez, H.J., Basinet, K.R., Klein, A.G., Martin, R.K.: A making and gaming approach to learning about RF path loss and antenna design. In: 2018 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), Princeton, NJ, pp. 247–253 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson, T., Shattuck, J.: Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educ. Res. 41(1), 16–25 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Susiani, T.S., Salimi, M., Hidayah, R.: Research Based Learning (RBL): how to improve critical thinking skills? In: SHS Web Conference, vol. 42 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poonpan, S., Siriphan, S.: Indicators of research–based learning instructional process: a case study of best practice in a primary school. Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University Phaya Thai, Bangkok, Thailand (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Usmeldi, U., Amini, R., Trisna, S.: The development of research-based learning model with science, environment, technology, and society approaches to improve critical thinking of students. J. Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 6(2), 318–325 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takeda, H., Veerkamp, P., Tomiyama, T., Yoshikawa, H.: Modeling design processes. AI Mag. 11(4), 37–48 (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nattapong Intarawiset
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sivadol Noulnoppadol
    • 2
  • Rattapon Jeenawong
    • 3
  • Somsak Akatimagool
    • 1
  1. 1.King Mongkut’s University of Technology North BangkokBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Rattaphum College Rajamangala University of Technology SrivijayaSongkhlaThailand
  3. 3.Rajamangala University of Technology LannaChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations