Advertisement

A Method to Balance Educational Game Content and Lesson Duration: The Case of a Digital Simulation Game for Nurse Training

  • Catherine Pons LelardeuxEmail author
  • Michel Galaup
  • Herve Pingaud
  • Catherine Mercadier
  • Pierre Lagarrigue
Conference paper
  • 24 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1134)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest for training future Healthcare professionals using a digital real like professional environment. An innovative interactive digital environment has been designed to train nurses to organize their job in a medical unit which hosts until fifteen patients. A set of interactive scenarios has been embedded in this game-based simulation. One of the critical point is to fit the educational content included in a scenario to the lesson duration. In this article, we present the method used to find a good balancing act between the time required to achieve a scenario and the educational content embedded in a digital game scenario.

Keywords

Virtual training environment Serious game Nurse scheduling Design experiment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

These works are part of a global innovative IT program whose partners are INU Champollion (University of Toulouse) and the French Regional Healthcare Agency (Occitanie). The steering committee is composed of Ph.D. C. Pons Lelardeux, Ph.D. M. Galaup, Pr. H. Pingaud, Pr. P. Lagarrigue, C. Mercadier, V. Teilhol.

References

  1. 1.
    Artigue, M.: Ingénierie didactique, recherches en didactique des mathématiques, vol. 9/3. La pensée sauvage, Grenoble (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloom, B.S.: Time and learning. Am. Psychol. 29(9), 682 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, A.L.: Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J. Learn. Sci. 2(2), 141–178 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carroll, J.B.: A model of school learning. Teach. Coll. Rec. 64, 723–733 (1963)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., Schauble, L.: Design experiments in educational research. Educ. Res. 32(1), 9–13 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collins, A.: Toward a design science of education. In: Scanlon, E., O’Shea, T. (eds.) New Directions in Educational Technology. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), vol. 96, pp. 15–22. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collins, A., Joseph, D., Bielaczyc, K.: Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. J. Learn. Sci. 13(1), 15–42 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliott, J.: Towards a comprehensive pedagogical theory to inform lesson study: an editorial review. Int. J. Lesson Learn. Stud. 4(4), 318–327 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gough, S., Hellaby, M., Jones, N., MacKinnon, R.: A review of undergraduate interprofessional simulation-based education (IPSE). Collegian 19(3), 153–170 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plomp, T.: Educational design research: an introduction. In: Educational Design Research, pp. 11–50 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reese, C.E., Jeffries, P.R., Engum, S.A.: Learning together: using simulations to develop nursing and medical student collaboration. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 31(1), 33–37 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Riem, N., Boet, S., Bould, M., Tavares, W., Naik, V.: Do technical skills correlate with non-technical skills in crisis resource management: a simulation study. Br. J. Anaesth. 109(5), 723–728 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Savoie-Zajc, L., Descamps-Bednarz, N.: Action research and collaborative research: their specific contributions to professional development. Educ. Action Res. 15(4), 577–596 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shernoff, D.J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., Shernoff, E.S.: Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In: Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education, pp. 475–494. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, vol. 41. HarperPerennial, New York (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Pons Lelardeux
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michel Galaup
    • 2
  • Herve Pingaud
    • 3
  • Catherine Mercadier
    • 4
  • Pierre Lagarrigue
    • 5
  1. 1.IRIT, University of Toulouse, INU Champollion, Serious Game Research LabAlbiFrance
  2. 2.EFTS, University of Toulouse, INU Champollion, Serious Game Research LabAlbiFrance
  3. 3.LGC, University of Toulouse, INU Champollion, Serious Game Research LabAlbiFrance
  4. 4.GIP E-sante, French Regional Healthcare Agency, ARS OccitanieToulouseFrance
  5. 5.ICA, University of Toulouse, INU Champollion, Serious Game Research LabAlbiFrance

Personalised recommendations