Advertisement

A Collaborative Approach in Designing Curriculum for Industry 4.0 Software Integration Implementation

  • Dan CenteaEmail author
  • Seshasai Srinivasan
  • Ishwar Singh
  • Tom Wanyama
Conference paper
  • 19 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1135)

Abstract

Working in Industry 4.0 enabled environments requires multi-disciplinary skills. Academic programs that produce graduates who are ready to support Industry 4.0 concepts need to offer curricula that prepare students to implement different aspects of Industry 4.0 as soon as they enter the workforce. Designing a full new curriculum or modifying an existing curriculum are challenging due to the multidisciplinary nature of the Industry 4.0 implementation. A possible approach involves collaboration between teams of academics specialized in hardware and in software who often belong to distinct academic programs, and include topics that generally belong to different academic specializations. Although such collaboration can be defined in theory, implementing it in an academic program brings a series of challenges. This paper presents a collaborative work that addresses the challenge of integrating software-specific topics in automation engineering and software engineering programs, and describes an experiential learning environment that demonstrate physical implementation of several Industry 4.0 concepts.

Keywords

Industry 4.0 Curriculum design Internet of Things Learning factory 

References

  1. 1.
    Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., Li, L.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56(8), 2941–2962 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhong, R.Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E., Newman, S.T.: Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: a review. Engineering 3(5), 616–630 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, L.: China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 135, 66–74 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hermann M., Pentek T., Otto B.: Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios - a literature review. Technical University, Dortmund (2015). http://www.snom.mb.tu-dortmund.de/cms/de/forschung/Arbeitsberichte/Design-Principles-for-Industrie-4_0-Scenarios.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2019
  5. 5.
    Lu, Y.: Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inform. Integr. 6, 1–10 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernández-Miranda, S.S., Marcos, M., Peralta, M.E., Aguayo, F.: The challenge of integrating Industry 4.0 in the degree of mechanical engineering. Proc. Manuf. 13, 1229–1236 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benešová, A., Tupa, J.: Requirements for education and qualification of people in Industry 4.0. Proc. Manuf. 11, 2195–2202 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J.: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Recommend. implement. Strategic Initiat. INDUSTRIE 4(199), 14 (2013). Accessed 31 May 2019Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stock, T., Seliger, G.: Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Proc. CIRP 40, 536–541 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Centea, D., Singh, I., Elbestawi, M.: Framework for the development of a cyber-physical systems learning centre. In: Auer, M.E., Zutin, D.G. (eds.) Online Engineering & IoT. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 22, pp. 919–931. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64352-6_86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wermann, J., Colombo, A.W., Pechmann, A., Zarte, M.: Using an interdisciplinary demonstration platform for teaching Industry 4.0. Proc. Manuf. 31, 302–308 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elbestawi, M., Centea, D., Singh, I., Wanyama, T.: SEPT learning factory for Industry 4.0 education and applied research. Proc. Manuf. 23, 249–254 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Centea, D., Singh, I., Elbestawi, M.: SEPT approached for education and training using a learning factory. Proc. Manuf. 31, 109–115 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., Sihn, W.: Tangible Industry 4.0: a scenario-based approach to learning for the future of production. Proc. CIRP 54, 13–18 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sackey, S.M., Bester, A., Adams, D.: Industry 4.0 learning factory didactic design parameters for industrial engineering education in South Africa. South Afr. J. Ind. Eng. 28(1), 114–124 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.7166/28-1-1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hennig, M., Reisinger, G., Trautner, T., Hold, P., Gerhard, D., Mazak, A.: TU Wien pilot factory Industry 4.0. Proc. Manuf. 31, 200–205 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baena, F., Guarin, A., Mora, J., Sauza, J., Retat, S.: Learning factory: the path to Industry 4.0. Proc. Manuf. 9, 73–80 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tisch, M., Hertle, C., Cachay, J., Abele, E., Metternich, J., Tenberg, R.: A systematic approach on developing action-oriented, competency based learning factories. Proc. CIRP 7, 580–585 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abele, E., Metternich, J., Tisch, M., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., ElMaraghy, H., Hummel, V., Ranz, F.: Learning factories for research, education, and training. Proc. CIRP 32, 1–6 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wanyama, T., Singh, I., Centea, D.: A practical approach to teaching Industry 4.0 technologies. In: Auer, M.E., Zutin, D.G. (eds.) Online Engineering & Internet of Things. LNNS, vol. 22, pp. 794–808. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64352-6_74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wanyama, T, Centea, D., Singh, I.: Teaching Industry 4.0 technologies and business modeling: case of energy efficiency and management. In: Proceeding of the Canadian Eng. Educ. Association Conference (CEEA 2015), 19–22 June 2016, Halifax (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Justason, M., Centea, D., Belkhir, L.: Development of M.Eng. programs with focus on Industry 4.0 and smart systems. In: Auer, M.E., Zutin, D.G. (eds.) Online Engineering & IoT. LNNS, vol. 22, pp. 68–76. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64352-6_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Centea
    • 1
    Email author
  • Seshasai Srinivasan
    • 1
  • Ishwar Singh
    • 1
  • Tom Wanyama
    • 1
  1. 1.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations