Thrill Me! Advertising Effectiveness in Extreme Versus Traditional Sports

  • Francesco RaggiottoEmail author


Millions of people enjoy extreme sports, and many brands use them as contexts for advertising. This chapter considers extreme sports through the lenses of edgework theory and cognitive adaptation theory, and develops two experiments that compare the challenge of leveraging advertising effectively and the degrees of difficulty in extreme and traditional sports settings with regard to high- and low-involvement products. Results suggest that challenge-based and difficulty-based advertisements positively affect persuasiveness, product attractiveness, intention to purchase, and willingness-to-pay only when set in an extreme sports scenario. Results are not influenced by the nature of the sports participation (i.e., active versus passive). Quantitative results are further supported by qualitative analyses based on follow-up interviews, which suggest the existence of relevant differences between extreme and traditional sports. An executive summary for managers and practitioners is provided at the end of this chapter.


Sports advertising Extreme sports Product attractiveness Purchasing intentions 


  1. Bajramović, I., Zorić, G., & Mašanović, B. (2018). Attitudes of consumers from the Sarajevo Canton in Bosnia and Herzegovina toward advertising through sport among the frequency of watching sports events. Journal of Anthropology of Sport and Physical Education, 2(2), 43–47. Scholar
  2. Bottomley, P. A., & Doyle, J. R. (2006). The interactive effects of colors and products on perceptions of brand logo appropriateness. Marketing Theory, 6(1), 63–83. Scholar
  3. Brymer, E. (2010). Risk taking in extreme sports: A phenomenological perspective. Annals of Leisure Research, 13(1–2), 218–238. Scholar
  4. Brymer, E., & Houge Mackenzie, S. (2016). Psychology and the extreme sport experience. In F. Feletti (Ed.), Extreme sports medicine (pp. 3–13). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Brymer, E., & Schweitzer, R. (2013). The search for freedom in extreme sports: A phenomenological exploration. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(6), 865–873. Scholar
  6. Buckley, R. (2012). Rush as a key motivation in skilled adventure tourism: Resolving the risk recreation paradox. Tourism Management, 33(4), 961–970. Scholar
  7. Bunn, M. (2017). Defining the edge: Choice, mastery and necessity in edgework practice. Sport in Society, 20(9), 1310–1323. Scholar
  8. Chang, C. (2011). Feeling ambivalent about going green. Journal of Advertising, 40(4), 19–32. Scholar
  9. ChronReport. (2011). The average income of a triathlete. Retrieved August 16, 2017, from
  10. Crofts, C., Schofield, G., & Dickson, G. (2012). Women-only mass participation sporting events: Does participation facilitate changes in physical activity? Annals of Leisure Research, 15(2), 148–159. Scholar
  11. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, & A. Kozbelt (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–705). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forbes. (2017). Forbes world’s most valuable brands. Retrieved from
  13. Fuchs, C., Schreier, M., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2015). The handmade effect: What’s love got to do with it? Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 98–110. Scholar
  14. Grace, D., & O’Cass, A. (2002). Brand associations: Looking through the eye of the beholder. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 5(2), 96–111. Scholar
  15. Gyimóthy, S., & Mykletun, R. J. (2004). Play in adventure tourism: The case of Arctic trekking. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), 855–878. Scholar
  16. Hardie-Bick, J., & Bonner, P. (2016). Experiencing flow, enjoyment and risk in skydiving and climbing. Ethnography, 17(3), 369–387. Scholar
  17. Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency? Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4), 475–492. Scholar
  18. Hoyle, R. H., Stephenson, M. T., Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E. P., & Donohew, R. L. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(3), 401–414. Scholar
  19. Jae Ko, Y., Zhang, J., Cattani, K., & Pastore, D. (2011). Assessment of event quality in major spectator sports. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(3), 304–322. Scholar
  20. Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. E. R. (2014). Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28(4), 312–331. Scholar
  21. Kaiser, A., Kragulj, F., Grisold, T., Walser, R., Schreier, M., Oberhauser, S., & Prügl, R. (2007). Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities. Marketing Letters, 18(1–2), 15–30. Scholar
  22. Kaplanidou, K., & Vogt, C. (2010). The meaning and measurement of a sport event experience among active sport tourists. Journal of Sport Management, 24(5), 544–566. Scholar
  23. Laurendeau, J. (2006). “He didn’t go in doing a skydive”: Sustaining the illusion of control in an edgework activity. Sociological Perspectives, 49(4), 583–605. Scholar
  24. Laurendeau, J. (2011). “If you’re reading this, it’s because i’ve died”: Masculinity and relational risk in BASE jumping. Sociology of Sport Journal, 28(4), 404–420. Scholar
  25. Lyng, S. (1990). A social psychological analysis of voluntary risk-taking. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(4), 851–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyng, S. (2014). Action and edgework: Risk taking and reflexivity in late modernity. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(4), 443–460. Scholar
  27. Lyng, S., & Matthews, R. (2007). Risk, edgework, and masculinities. In K. Hannah-Moffat & P. O’Malley (Eds.), Gendered risks (pp. 75–97). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. MacIntyre, T. E., Igou, E. R., Campbell, M. J., Moran, A. P., & Matthews, J. (2014). Metacognition and action: A new pathway to understanding social and cognitive aspects of expertise in sport. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1155. Scholar
  29. MacIntyre, T. E., & Moran, A. P. (2007). A qualitative investigation of imagery use and meta-imagery processes among elite canoe-slalom competitors. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 2(1), 1–23. Scholar
  30. MacIntyre, T. E., & Moran, A. P. (2012). Meta-imagery processes among elite sports performers. In A. Guillot & C. Collet (Eds.), The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery (pp. 227–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Scholar
  31. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65. Scholar
  32. Mallett, C. J., & Hanrahan, S. J. (2004). Elite athletes: Why does the “fire” burn so brightly? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5(2), 183–200. Scholar
  33. Masanovic, B., Zoric, G., & Gardasevic, J. (2017). Attitudes of Turkish consumers toward advertising through sport among the frequency of watching sports events. Journal of Anthropology of Sport and Physical Education, 1(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). Guelph, ON: University of Guelph. Scholar
  35. Milovanovic, D. (2005). Edgework: A subjective and structural model of negotiating boundaries. In S. Lyng (Ed.), Edgework: The sociology of risk taking (pp. 17–49). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Moorman, M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2002). The effects of magazine-induced psychological responses and thematic congruence on memory and attitude toward the ad in a real-life setting. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 27–40. Scholar
  37. Moran, A. (2002). In the mind’s eye. The Psychologist, 15(8), 414–415.Google Scholar
  38. Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 64–81. Scholar
  39. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Ramchandani, G., Davies, L. E., Coleman, R., Shibli, S., & Bingham, J. (2015). Limited or lasting legacy? The effect of non-mega sport event attendance on participation. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(1), 93–110. Scholar
  41. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rhea, D. J., & Martin, S. (2010). Personality trait differences of traditional sport athletes. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 5(1), 75–86. Scholar
  43. Self, D. R., Henry, E. D. V., Findley, C. S., & Reilly, E. (2007). Thrill seeking: The type T personality and extreme sports. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 2(1/2), 175–190. Scholar
  44. Taylor, S. (1983). Adjustment to threating events: Theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Team USA. (2016). USA Triathlon Annual Membership Report—2015 update. Retrieved August 16, 2017, from
  46. The New York Times. (2011). Nike tries to enter the niche sports it has missed.Google Scholar
  47. Thomson, C. J., Carlson, S. R., & Rupert, J. L. (2013). Association of a common D3 dopamine receptor gene variant is associated with sensation seeking in skiers and snowboarders. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(2), 153–158. Scholar
  48. Tingchi Liu, M., Huang, Y., & Minghua, J. (2007). Relations among attractiveness of endorsers, match-up, and purchase intention in sport marketing in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(6), 358–365. Scholar
  49. Trail, G. T., Fink, J. S., & Anderson, D. F. (2003). Sport spectator consumption behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12, 8–17.Google Scholar
  50. Triathlon Business International. (2014). Breaking down the U.S. triathlon marketplace. Retrieved August 16, 2017, from
  51. Van Rompay, T. J. L., & Pruyn, A. T. H. (2011). When visual product features speak the same language: Effects of shape-typeface congruence on brand perception and price expectations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 599–610. Scholar
  52. Willig, C. (2008). A phenomenological investigation of the experience of taking part in “extreme sports”. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(5), 690–702. Scholar
  53. Xtremesports. (2008). Extreme sport growing in popularity. Retrieved August 16, 2017, from
  54. Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1–14. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of UdineUdineItaly

Personalised recommendations